The Effectiveness of Application of Field Study Method Innovation with Real Time Report Assisted with Mind Mapping on Ecosystem Materials on Student Learning Outcomes of Prospective Science Teachers
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1257Published:
2022-04-30Issue:
Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): AprilKeywords:
Effectiveness, Method innovation, Field study, Real time report, Mind mappingResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
Effectiveness generally refers to how far a predetermined goal can be achieved. In order for the goal to be achieved, we must be able to provide the right innovation in a learning process. Learning innovation itself is an interaction between a complex set of practices, methods and designs that are part of the efforts made in higher education to improve the quality of teaching and learning. In this study, researchers applied the Real Time Report innovation to the implementation of the Mind Mapping-assisted Field Study. The aims of this method innovation are; Through Real Time Report Innovation in Field Study, students can report their observations directly and get input at the same time so that the process in the field is more focused. Through Mind Mapping, students can connect the images from the field study with the concepts they have correctly. Furthermore, knowing the effectiveness of the application of the method innovation that is applied to the learning outcomes of prospective teacher students. This study uses quasi-experimental research with one group pretest-posttest design. The results show that the application of the Field Study method with innovation in the form of Real time reports assisted by Mind Mapping is effective in teaching EcosystemsReferences
Abuddin, N. (2009). Perspektif Islam Tentang Strategi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana.
Aqib, Z. (2013). Model-model, Media, dan Strategi Pembelajaran Kontekstual (Inovatif). Bandung: Yrama Widya.
Bevan, N., & Sharon, T. (2009). Field Study. www.usabilitybok.org/field-study.
Buzan, T. (2005). Buku Pintar Mind Mapping. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka.
Djamarah, S.B. (2000). Guru dan Anak Didik dalam Interaksi Edukatif, Edisi 1. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Easton, E., & Gilburn, A. (2012). The field course effect: gains in cognitive learning in undergraduate biology students following a field course. Journal of Biological Education, 46(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2011.568063
Goldberg, L. J. (2012). Teaching Generation TechX with the 4Cs: Using Technology to Integrate 21st Century Skills, 1, 59–66. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1127608
Kim, J., & Maloney, E. J. (2020). Learning Inovation and the Future og Higher Education. JHU Press. Maryland.
Li, B., Jia, X., Chi, Y., Liu, X., & Jia, B. (2020). Project-based learning in a collaborative group can enhance student skill and ability in the biochemical laboratory: a case study. Journal of Biological Education, 54(4), 404–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1600570
Meltzer, D.E. (2002). The Relationship Between Mathematics Preparation and conceptual learning gain in physics: A possible inhidden Variablei in Diagnostic pretest scores. Ames: Department of physics and Astronomy, Lowa State University
Novak, J. D., & Govin, D.B. (1984). Learning How to Learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Prokop, P., Tuncer, G., Kvasnicˇa´k, R. (2007). Short-term effects of a field programme on students’ knowledge and attitude toward biology: A Slovak experience. Journal of Science Education and Technology 16, no. 3: 247–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10956-007-9044-8
Riyanto, T. (2002). Pembelajaran Sebagai Proses Bimbingan Pribadi. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
Silberman, M.L. (2009). Active Learning: 101 Cara Belajar Siswa Aktif (Alih bahasa: Raisul Muttaqien). rev.ed. Bandung: Nusamedia
Sudjana, N. (1990). Cara Belajar Siswa Aktif. Bandung: Banu Algesindo.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suprijanto. (2009). Pendidikan Orang Dewasa. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Uno, H. (2008). Teori Motivasi dan Pengukurannya, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Widodo, A. (2004). Contructivist Oriented Lessons: The Learning Environment and The Teaching Sequences. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Windura, S. (2008). Mind Map Langkah Demi Langkah. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Zhang, J., Hong., H.Y., Teo, C., Scandamalia, M., & Morley, E. (2008). Constantly Going Deeper: Knowledge Building Innovation in an Elementary Professional Community. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, New York.
Author Biography
Geterudis Kerans, STKIP Weetebula
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Geterudis Kerans
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
