The Analysis of Difficulties in Logical Thinking Ability in Learning Natural Science Faced by Students of Elementary Education
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1295Published:
2022-04-30Issue:
Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): AprilKeywords:
Logical thinking, natural science, elementary educationsResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
Logical thinking is analyzing a situation and coming up with a reasonable solution. It is crucial because it can help a person reason through crucial decisions, solve problems, generate creative ideas, and set goals to be achieved, all of which are needed to develop self-competence. This study aims to explain students' difficulties in logical thinking ability in elementary education on a natural science course. This study is qualitative using the literature review technique about students' difficulties in logical thinking. The results of the analysis have shown that the difficulties faced by students in developing logical thinking ability are in determining alternatives for the problems given; choosing and solving problems in natural science given by lecturers, and in students to understand. The causes of students having difficulties in developing logical thinking are not used to solving problems in natural science that need logical thinking. In addition, students are less creative in choosing or looking for the right strategy for the problems given. Finally, students are less thorough in solving problems in natural scienceReferences
Agustina, R., & Farida, N. (2019). Analisis kebutuhan pengembangan bahan ajar matematika bagi siswa low vision. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 4(2), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.33449/jpmr.v4i2.9753
Aminudin, A. H., Dirgantara, Y., & Rusnayati, H. (2016). Didactical design research (ddr) pada hukum pascal berdasarkan kesulitan belajar siswa kelas X MAN Cililin Kabupaten Bandung Barat. Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics, 1(2), 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.15575/jotalp.v1i2.5816
Bakhy, S., Kalimbetov, B., & Khabibullayev, Z. (2018). Possibilities of mathematical problems in logical thinking. Development of secondary education pupils. Opción: Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, 85, 441-457. Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7335587
Creswell, J. W. (2014). A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research. SAGE Publication.
Dannels, D. P., Anson, C. M., Bullard, L., & Peretti, S. (2003). Challenges in learning communication skills in chemical engineering. Communication Education, 52(1), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520302454
Diana, N. (2018). Mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan berpikir logis mahasiswa dengan adversity quotient dalam pemecahan masalah. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika (SNMPM), 2(1), 101–112. Retrieved from http://www.fkip-unswagati.ac.id/ejournal/index.php/snmpm/article/view/377
Effendi, M. S., Rafli, Z., & Rahmat, A. (2017). The influence of teaching models and reasoning ability toward writing skill. IJLECR-International Journal of Language Education and Culture Review, 3(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21009/IJLECR.032.01
Fadiana, M., Amin, S. M., Lukito, A., Wardhono, A., & Aishah, S. (2019). Assessment of seventh grade students capacity of logical thinking. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 75-80. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v0i0.11644
Fitria, Y., Monalisa, C., & Ahda, Y. (2019). Critical thinking skill improvement using problem based learning (pbl) model of 4th grade students of elementary school. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 8(2), 429-432. Retrieved from https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v8i2/ART20194984.pdf
Fitria, Y., Permatasari, A., Sudargo, F., & Sopandi, W. (2013). Elementary teacher student perspective to natural science learning as accomodate effort of need study capability. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 2(3), 482–485. Retrieved from https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v2i3/IJSROFF2013101.pdf
Hidayat, W., & Sumarmo, U. (2013). Kemampuan komunikasi dan berpikir logis matematika serta kemandirian belajar. Jurnal Delta-Pi, 2(1), 1-14.
http://dx.doi.org/10.33387/dpi.v2i1.94
Hasibuan, M.P., Sari, R.P., Syahputra, R.A., & Nahadi, N. (2022). Application of integrated project-based and stem-based e-learning tools to improve students’ creative thinking and self-regulation skills. Jurnal Penelitian
Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.1050
Lusidawaty, V., Fitria, Y., Miaz, Y., & Zikri, A. (2020). Pembelajaran IPA dengan strategi pembelajaran inkuiri untuk meningkatkan keterampilan proses sains dan motivasi belajar siswa di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(1), 168-174. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i1.333
Malik, A., Khasanah, U., Agustina, R. D., & Zakwandi, R. (2019a). Which one is better hands on or phet simulation on harmonic oscillation. Edusains, 11(2), 264–278. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v11i2.10571
Malik, A., & Ubaidillah, M. (2021a). The use of smartphone applications in laboratory activities in developing scientific communication skills of students. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 9(1), 76-84. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v9i1.18628
Malik, A., & Ubaidillah, M. (2021b). Multiple skills laboratory activities: How to improve students’ scientific communication and collaboration skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(4), 585-595. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i4.31442
Malik, A., & Mujib, U. (2020). Students critical-creative thinking skill: A multivariate analysis of experiments and gender. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 8(S), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2020-8-SI-49-58
Malik, A., Yuliani, Y., Rochman, C., Zakwandi, R., Ismail, A., & Ubaidillah, M. (2020). Optimizing students critical thinking skills related to heat topics through the model of content, context, connection, researching, reasoning, reflecting (3C3R). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(2), 022001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/2/022001
Malik, A., Yuningtias, U. A., Mulhayatiah, D., Chusni, M. M., Sutarno, S., Ismail, A., & Hermita, N. (2019b). Enhancing problem-solving skills of students through problem solving laboratory model related to dynamic fluid. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3), 032010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032010
Marta, H., Fitria, Y., Hadiyanto, H., & Zikri, A. (2020). Penerapan pendekatan contextual teaching and learning pada pembelajaran IPA untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar dan motivasi belajar siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(1), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i1.334
McLeod, S. A. (2015). Jean Piaget: Cognitive Theory. Developmental Psychology.
Moma, L. (2017). Pengembangan kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan pemecahan masalah matematis mahasiswa melalui metode diskusi. Jurnal cakrawala pendidikan, 36(1), 130-139. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v36i1.10402
Nuryantini, A. Y., Fajriah, H. N., Zakwandi, R., & Nuryadin, B. W. (2020). Simple harmonic motion experiments with the accelerometer sensor on a smartphone: Improving the problem solving-ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1572(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1572/1/012058
Octaria, D. (2017). Kemampuan berpikir logis mahasiswa pendidikan matematika universitas pgri palembang pada mata kuliah geometri analitik. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika RAFA, 3(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.19109/jpmrafa.v3i2.1740
Rosita, C. D., & Nopriana, T. (2016). Analisis tingkat berpikir geometri dan tingkat berpikir logis serta disposisi berpikir kritis mahasiswa. In Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika (SNMPM) (Vol. 9, Issue August).
Ramirez, H. J. M., & Monterola, S. L. C. (2019). Co-creating scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning and its effects on students’ logical thinking in earth science. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1702063
Sari, R. N., Ahda, Y., & Fitria, Y. (2019). Effectiveness of guided inquiry learning model and problem based learning learning model on thematic integrated learning competency. International Journal of Educational Dynamics, 1(2), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.24036/ijeds.v1i2.188
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitaif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sumarmo, U., Hidayat, W., Zukarnaen, R., Hamidah, M., & Sariningsih, R. (2012). Kemampuan dan disposisi berpikir logis, kritis, dan kreatif matematik (eksperimen terhadap siswa sma menggunakan pembelajaran berbasis masalah dan strategi think-talk-write). Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 17(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v17i1.36048
Wang, X., Schneider, C., & Valacich, J. S. (2015). Enhancing creativity in group collaboration: How performance targets and feedback shape perceptions and idea generation performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 42, 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.017
Author Biographies
Yanti Fitria, Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Dasar, Universitas Negeri Padang
Adam Malik, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Yanti Fitria, Adam Malik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).