Development of Biological Macromolecules Three-Tier Test (BM-3T) to Identify Misconceptions of Prospective Science Teachers

Authors

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1297

Published:

2022-10-31

Issue:

Vol. 8 No. 4 (2022): October

Keywords:

Three-tier test, Biological macromolecules, Misconceptions, Prospective science teachers

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Suriani, N. W., Wola, B. R., & Komansilan, A. (2022). Development of Biological Macromolecules Three-Tier Test (BM-3T) to Identify Misconceptions of Prospective Science Teachers . Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 1798–1805. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1297

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This study aims to develop a valid and reliable biological macromolecules three-tier test (BM-3T) so that it is feasible to identify misconceptions of prospective science teachers. This research is a type of research and development by following the research design by Kiliç and Sağlam, which consists of three stages, namely defining content, obtaining information on student misconceptions, and developing tests. Research data was obtained through interviews, validation, and test trials. The subjects in this study consisted of 14 prospective science teachers in the first semester in the 2021/2022 academic year at the Universitas Negeri Manado. The data analysis carried out includes the analysis of test validity, test reliability analysis, and test difficulty level analysis. The results showed that the 16 test items developed were declared valid, the test reliability coefficient of 0.78 was in the reliable category, and the level of difficulty of BM-3T shows an average value of 0.44, which is included in the moderate category. Therefore, BM-3T is appropriate to identify misconceptions of prospective science teachers on the topic of biological macromolecules.

References

Adityawardani, D. & Hidayati, S. N. (2017). Profil konsepsi siswa SMP dengan CRI test berbasis revised Bloom’s taxonomy pada materi klasifikasi materi dan perubahannya. E-Jurnal Pensa, 5(3), 335-340. Retrieved from: https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/pensa/article/view/21423

Al-Rsa’I, M. S., Khoshman, J. M., & Abu Tayeh, K. (2020). Jordanian Pre-Service Physics Teacher'smisconceptions about Force and Motion. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(4), 528-543. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.43

Arikunto, S. (2014). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, S. (2015). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Arslan, H. O., Cigdemoglu, C., & Moseley, C. (2012). A three-tier diagnostic test to assess pre-service teachers’ misconceptions about global warming, greenhouse effect, ozone layer depletion, and acid rain. International Journal of Science Education, 34(11), 1667–1686. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.680618

Boodhun, N. (2018). Seeing is believing: structures and functions of biological molecules. BioTechniques, 64(4), 143–146. https://doi.org/10.2144/btn-2017-0123

Çam, A., Topçu, M. S., & Sülün, Y. (2015). Preservice science teachers’ attitudes towards chemistry and misconceptions about chemical kinetics. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 16(2), 1-16. Retrieved from: https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/download/v16_issue2_files/cam.pdf

Fatokun, K. V. F. (2016). Instructional misconceptions of prospective chemistry teachers in chemical bonding. International Journal of Science and Technology Educational Research, 7(2), 18-24. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJSTER2016.0357

Gronlund, N. E. (1993). How to Make Achievement Tests and Assessments. Boston, USA: Allyn and Bacon.

Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(5), 989-1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a

Jaswal, S. S., O’Hara, P. B., Williamson, P. L., & Springer, A. L. (2013). Teaching structure: Student use of software tools for understanding macromolecular structure in an undergraduate biochemistry course. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 41(5), 351-359. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20718

Juliani, Yuzrial, & Huda, I. (2021). Development of four-tier multiple choice diagnostic test to know students’ misconceptions in science learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(4), 763-769. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i4.854

Jusniar, J., Effendy, E., Budiasih, E., & Sutrisno, S. (2020). Developing a three-tier diagnostic instrument on chemical equilibrium (TT-DICE). Educación Química, 31(3), 84-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/fq.18708404e.2020.3.72133

Kanli, U. (2014). A study on identifying the misconceptions of pre-service and in-service teachers about basic astronomy concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(5), 471-479. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1120a

Karakaya, F., Yilmaz, M., & Aka, E. I. (2021). Examination of pre-service science teachers’ conceptual perceptions and misconceptions about photosynthesis. Pedagogical Research, 6(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/11216

Karataş, A. (2020). Preservice science teachers’ misconceptions about evolution. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 8(2), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v8i2.4690

Karim, S. A., Sudiro, S., & Sakinah, S. (2021). Utilizing test items analysis to examine the level of difficulty and discriminating power in a teacher-made test. EduLite: Journal of English Education, Literature, and Culture, 6(2), 256-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/e.6.2.256-269

Katalog Jurusan Pendidikan IPA FMIPA Universitas Negeri Manado. (2021).

Kurtulus, M. A. & Tatar, N. (2021). An analysis of scientific articles on science misconception: A bibliometric research. Elementary Education Online, 20(1), 192-207. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.01.022

Liampa, V., Malandrakis, G. N., Papadopoulou, P., & Pnevmatikos, D. (2019). Development and evaluation of a three-tier diagnostic test to assess undergraduate primary tachers’ understanding of ecological footprint. Research in Science Education, 49(3), 711-736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9643-1

Mason, K. A., Losos, J. B., & Singer, S. R. (2016). Biology 11th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Ozkan, G. & Ackay, H. (2016). Preservice science teachers’ beliefs about astronomy concepts. Universal Journal of Education Research, 4(9), 2092-2099. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040921

Pesman, H. & Eryilmaz, A. (2010). Development of a three-tier test to assess misconceptions about simple electric circuits. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(3), 208-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383002

Riduwan (2012). Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Safo-Adu, G. (2020). Remediating pre-service integrated science teachers’ misconceptions about acid-base concepts using cognitive conflict instructional strategy. American Journal of Education and Information Technology, 4(2), 86-98. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajeit.20200402.17

Soeharto, S., Csapó, B., Sarimanah, E., Dewi, F. I., & Sabri, T. (2019). A review of students’ common misconceptions in science and their diagnostic assessment tools. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(2), 247-266. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i2.18649

Susanti, R. (2018). Misconception of biology education student of teacher training and education of Sriwijaya University to the concept of photosynthesis and respiration. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1022(012056), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1022/1/012056

Suwarto. (2013). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Dalam Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Türkogus, S. (2020). Investigation of three-tier diagnostic and multiple choice test on chemistry concepts with response change behavior. International Education Studies, 13(9), 10-22. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n9p10

Wahyuni, A. S. A., Rustaman, N., Rusdiana, D., & Muslim. (2019). Paper conceptions and misconceptions of pre-service teacher about light. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Advanced Multidisciplinary Research (ICAMR 2018), Makassar – Indonesia, 56-61.

Widiarti, H. R., Marfuaf, S., & Retnosari, R. (2019). Identifying students’ misconception about intermolecular forces topic in organic chemistry I course. Unnes Science Education Journal, 8(1), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v8i1.23527

Wola, B. R., Ibrahim, M., & Purnomo, T. (2020). Development of a four-tier multiple-choice test on the concept of transport across membranes. SEJ (Science Education Journal), 4(2), 77-97. https://doi.org/10.21070/sej.v4i2.878

Yang, DC. & Sianturi, I. A. J. (2019). Assessing students’ conceptual understanding using an online three-tier diagnostic test. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(5), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12368

Yangin, S., Sidekli, S., & Gokbulut, Y. (2014). Prospective teachers’ misconceptions about classification of plants and changes in their misconceptions during pre-service education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(1), 106-117. Retrieved from: http://oaji.net/articles/2015/987-1437062464.pdf

Zaman, A., Niwaz, A., Faize, F. A., Dahar, M. A., & Alamgir. (2010). Analysis of multiple choice items’ sequencing on difficulty level in the test of mathematics. European Journal of Social Sciences, 17(1), 61-67. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261367711_Analysis_of_. Mathematics

Zuhdi, M. & Busyairi, A. (2021). Misconception Profile of Prospective Physics Teachers Assessed from Various Representations of Electricity Subjects. Journal of Science and Science Education, 2(1), 33-37. https://doi.org/10.29303/jossed.v2i1.490

Author Biographies

Ni Wayan Suriani, Department of Natural Science Education, State University of Manado, Minahasa, Indonesia.

Brian Ricard Wola, Department of Natural Science Education, State University of Manado, Minahasa, Indonesia.

Alfrits Komansilan, Department of Physics Education, State University of Manado, Minahasa, Indonesia.

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Ni Wayan Suriani, Brian, Alfrits Komansilan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).