Physics Problem Solving Skills with IBL-STEMWeb: Students on Small Islands in Maluku
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1344Published:
2022-04-30Issue:
Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): AprilKeywords:
Problem solving skills, IBL, STEM, Web, Small IslandsResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
Learning on small islands in Maluku still has many obstacles. It is limited by inadequate supporting facilities and infrastructure in the form of internet availability in accessing learning materials. Maluku's natural resources, both biological and non-biological, are very abundant. However, they have not been managed properly in improving the community's welfare. Therefore, education is one of the spearheads in improving the quality of students so that they can manage the existing nature well in the future. One of the recommended lessons is IBL-STEWeb to improve the academic quality of students. The use of IBL-STEWeb can take into account the involvement of students' preconceptions, provide in-depth basic knowledge, help students make connections within the context of a conceptual framework, and can map students' knowledge in a way that facilitates the search and application of information
References
Akben, N. (2020). Effects of the Problem-Posing Approach on Students’ Problem Solving Skills and Metacognitive Awareness in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 1143–1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9726-7
Alonso, F., López, G., Manrique, D., & Viñes, J. M. (2005). An instructional model for web-based e-learning education with a blended learning process approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00454.x
Bao, L., & Koenig, K. (2019). Physics education research for 21st century learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0007-8
Becerra-Labra, C., Gras-MartÃ, A., & MartÃnez Torregrosa, J. (2012). Effects of a Problem-based Structure of Physics Contents on Conceptual Learning and the Ability to Solve Problems. International Journal of Science Education, 34(8), 1235–1253. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.619210
Bell, T., Urhahne, D., Schanze, S., & Ploetzner, R. (2010). Collaborative inquiry learning: Models, tools, and challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 349–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802582241
Capaldi, M. (2015). Including inquiry-based learning in a flipped class. Primus, 25(8), 736–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2015.1031303
Chen, P. S. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers and Education, 54(4), 1222–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.008
Conradty, C., & Bogner, F. X. (2019). From STEM to STEAM: Cracking the Code? How Creativity & Motivation Interacts with Inquiry-based Learning. Creativity Research Journal, 31(3), 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1641678
Dare, E. A., Ring-Whalen, E. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2019). Creating a continuum of STEM models: Exploring how K-12 science teachers conceptualize STEM education. International Journal of Science Education, 41(12), 1701–1720. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1638531
DeCoito, I. (2016). STEM Education in Canada: A Knowledge Synthesis. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(2), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1166297
Ekici, C., & Gard, A. (2017). Inquiry-Based Learning of Transcendental Functions in Calculus. Primus, 27(7), 681–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2016.1214654
Etkina, E. (2010). Pedagogical content knowledge and preparation of high school physics teachers. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 6(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020110
Fernandez, F. B. (2017). Action research in the physics classroom: the impact of authentic, inquiry based learning or instruction on the learning of thermal physics. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 3(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-017-0014-z
Glaze, A. L. (2018). Teaching and learning science in the 21st century: Challenging critical assumptions in post-secondary science. Education Sciences, 8(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8010012
Gök, T., & Sýlay, I. (2010). The Effects of Problem Solving Strategies on Students’ Achievement, Attitude and Motivation. Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, 4(1), 7–21.
Goldstein, O. (2016). A project-based learning approach to teaching physics for pre-service elementary school teacher education students. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1200833
Gordon, N., & Brayshaw, M. (2008). Inquiry based Learning in Computer Science teaching in Higher Education. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 7(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.11120/ital.2008.07010022
Guisasola, J., AlmudÃ, J. M., & Furió, C. (2005). The nature of science and its implications for physics textbooks: The case of classical magnetic field theory. Science and Education, 14(3–5), 321–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-004-7936-z
Hackman, S. T., Zhang, D., & He, J. (2021). Secondary school science teachers’ attitudes towards STEM education in Liberia. International Journal of Science Education, 43(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1864837
Harney, O. M., Hogan, M. J., & Quinn, S. (2017). Investigating the effects of peer to peer prompts on collaborative argumentation, consensus and perceived efficacy in collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(3), 307–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9263-9
Hegde, B., & Meera, B. N. (2012). How do they solve it? An insight into the learner’s approach to the mechanism of physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010109
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
Hobson, A. (2008). The Surprising Effectiveness of College Scientific Literacy Courses. The Physics Teacher, 46(7), 404–406. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2981285
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347–1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601007549
Kähler, J., Hahn, I., & Köller, O. (2020). The development of early scientific literacy gaps in kindergarten children. International Journal of Science Education, 42(12), 1988–2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1808908
Kaufmann, F. (1959). Journal of Philosophy. Journal of Philosophy, Inc., XXXVI(143), 388–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/xxxvi.143.388
Klegeris, A., Gustafsson, E., & Hurren, H. (2018). Comparison of student marks obtained by an assessment panel reveals generic problem-solving skills and academic ability as distinct skill sets. Compare, 48(5), 674–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2017.1339261
Kolovou, M., & Kim, N. J. (2020). Effects of implementing an integrative drama-inquiry learning model in a science classroom. Journal of Educational Research, 113(3), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2020.1771673
Lämsä, J., Hämäläinen, R., Koskinen, P., Viiri, J., & Lämsä, J. (2018). Visualising the temporal aspects of collaborative inquiry-based learning processes in technology- enhanced physics learning learning. International Journal of Science Education, 0(0), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1506594
Lee, R., Hoe Looi, K., Faulkner, M., & Neale, L. (2021). The moderating influence of environment factors in an extended community of inquiry model of e-learning. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1758032
Lin, S. Y., & Singh, C. (2013). Using an isomorphic problem pair to learn introductory physics: Transferring from a two-step problem to a three-step problem. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 9(2), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.020114
Love, B., Hodge, A., Corritore, C., & Ernst, D. C. (2015). Inquiry-based learning and the flipped classroom model. Primus, 25(8), 745–762. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2015.1046005
Martinez-Maldonado, R., Dimitriadis, Y., Martinez-Monés, A., Kay, J., & Yacef, K. (2013). Capturing and analyzing verbal and physical collaborative learning interactions at an enriched interactive tabletop. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(4), 455–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9184-1
Mun, K., Shin, N., Lee, H., Kim, S. W., Choi, K., Choi, S. Y., & Krajcik, J. S. (2015). Korean Secondary Students’ Perception of Scientific Literacy as Global Citizens: Using Global Scientific Literacy Questionnaire. International Journal of Science Education, 37(11), 1739–1766. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1045956
Nadelson, L. S., Callahan, J., Pyke, P., Hay, A., Dance, M., & Pfiester, J. (2013). Teacher STEM perception and preparation: Inquiry-based stem professional development for elementary teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 106(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2012.667014
Ni, A. Y. (2013). Comparing the Effectiveness of Classroom and Online Learning: Teaching Research Methods. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(2), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2013.12001730
Orion, N., & Kali, Y. (2005). The effect of an earth-science learning program on students’ scientific thinking skills. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4), 387–393. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-53.4.387
Osborne, J. (2007). Science education for the twenty first century. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(3), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75396
Park, M. (2020). Seeing the Forest through the Trees Using Network Analysis: Exploring Student Responses to Conceptual Physics Questions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(5), 605–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09840-w
Ring, E. A., Dare, E. A., Crotty, E. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2017). The evolution of teacher conceptions of STEM education throughout an intensive professional development experience. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(5), 444–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2017.1356671
Rogers, R. R. (2001). Reflection in Higher Education: A Concept Analysis. Innovative Higher Education, 26(1), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010986404527
Salta, K., & Koulougliotis, D. (2020). Domain specificity of motivation: chemistry and physics learning among undergraduate students of three academic majors. International Journal of Science Education, 42(2), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1708511
Sezgin Selçuk, G., & Çalýskan, S. (2008). The effects of problem solving instruction on physics achievement, problem solving performance and strategy use. Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, 2(3), 151–166.
Suprapto, N. (2016). Students' attitudes towards STEM education: Voices from Indonesian junior high school. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(Special Issue), 75-87
Spronken-Smith, R., & Walker, R. (2010). Can inquiry-based learning strengthen the links between teaching and disciplinary research? Studies in Higher Education, 35(6), 723–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903315502
Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2013). User acceptance towards web-based learning systems: Investigating the role of social, organizational and individual factors in european higher education. Procedia Computer Science, 17, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.026
Tian, Y., Xiao, W., Li, C., Liu, Y., Qin, M., Wu, Y., Xiao, L., & Li, H. (2014). Virtual microscopy system at Chinese medical university: An assisted teaching platform for promoting active learning and problem-solving skills. BMC Medical Education, 14(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-74
Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59(1), 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253
Turşucu, S., Spandaw, J., & de Vries, M. J. (2020). Search for Symbol Sense Behavior: Students in Upper Secondary Education Solving Algebraic Physics Problems. In Research in Science Education (Vol. 50, Issue 5, pp. 2131–2157). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9766-z
Tuwoso. (2016). The implementation of constructivism approach for physics learning in vocational high school. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1778(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4965791
Udompong, L., & Wongwanich, S. (2014). Diagnosis of the Scientific Literacy Characteristics of Primary Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 5091–5096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1079
Vakil, S., & Ayers, R. (2019). The racial politics of STEM education in the USA: interrogations and explorations. Race Ethnicity and Education, 22(4), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2019.1592831
Voet, M., & De Wever, B. (2017). Preparing pre-service history teachers for organizing inquiry-based learning: The effects of an introductory training program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63(1), 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.019
von Renesse, C., & Ecke, V. (2015). Inquiry-Based Learning and the Art of Mathematical Discourse. Primus, 25(3), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2014.921799
Wartono, W., Hudha, M. N., & Batlolona, J. R. (2018). How are the physics critical thinking skills of the students taught by using inquiry-discovery through empirical and theorethical overview? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 691–697. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80632
Wilson, H. E. (2018). Integrating the Arts and STEM for Gifted Learners. Roeper Review, 40(2), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2018.1434712
Zohar, B. R., & Trumper, R. (2020). The Influence of Inquiry-Based Remote Observations via Powerful Optic Robotic Telescopes on High School Students’ Conceptions of Physics and of Learning Physics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(5), 635–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09842-8
Author Biographies
John Rafafy Batlolona, Universitas Pattimura
Jamaludin Jamaludin, Pattimura University
License
Copyright (c) 2022 John Rafafy Batloloba, Jamaludin Jamaludin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).