Construction and Validation of Evaluation Instruments for Science Learning Programs Based on Context, Input, Process, And Product (CIPP) Models

Authors

Cindy Alvianita , Tanti Tanti , Bambang Hariyadi

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1369

Published:

2022-07-31

Issue:

Vol. 8 No. 3 (2022): July

Keywords:

CIPP Model, CFA, Evaluation, EFA , Factor Analysis

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Alvianita, C. ., Tanti, T., & Hariyadi, B. . (2022). Construction and Validation of Evaluation Instruments for Science Learning Programs Based on Context, Input, Process, And Product (CIPP) Models. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1089–1095. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1369
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This study aims to develop an evaluation instrument for science learning program in junior high schools based on the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model. This research uses the exploratory sequential mix method for instrument development. The qualitative stage was carried out through in-depth interviews with five principals and ten teachers. The qualitative stage aims to analyze needs in the field and explore the opinions of school principals and teachers regarding the evaluation of science learning programs. Researchers distributed instruments to 112 participants for the quantitative stage of the validation test. The instrument was validated in three stages. The first stage is the face validity test, the second stage is the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) test, and the last stage is the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) test. The results of face validity conducted with two experts stated that each indicator developed had followed the flow of the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) model. Exploratory Factor Analysis Test Based on scree plot data, it was found that there was a fault after the four components, and the researcher decided to take four elements with a total variance of 50.95%. The confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) test showed that from 47 items, only 35 items were declared valid. This research has positive implications for the practice of integrated science learning at the junior high school level in Indonesia. Principals and teachers can use this CIPP-based evaluation instrument to evaluate the effectiveness of the integrated science learning process that has been carried out so far

References

Anjarsari, P. (2014). Pentingnya melatih keterampilan berpikir (thinking skills) dalam pembelajaran IPA SMP. Paper presented at the Makalah disampaikan dalam PPM “Optimalisasi Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 dengan Workshop Pengembangan LKS IPA Berpendekatan Guided Inquiry untuk Mengembangkan Thinking Skills dan Sikap Ilmiah Siswa.

Aziz, S., Mahmood, M., & Rehman, Z. (2018). Implementation of CIPP Model for Quality Evaluation at School Level: A Case Study. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(1), 189-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v5i1.1553

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research: Sage publications. Retrieved from https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/designing-and-conducting-mixed-methods-research/book241842

Dari, U., Halim, A., & Ilyas, S. (2022). The Influence of the use of the approach of blended learning model rotation based moodle on motivation and cognitive abilities of students in the subjects of physics. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 195-202. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.1100

Darma, I. K. (2019). The effectiveness of teaching program of CIPP evaluation model: Department of mechanical engineering, Politeknik Negeri Bali. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT & Scientific Research, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v5n3.619

Hakan, K., & Seval, F. (2011). CIPP evaluation model scale: development, reliability and validity. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 592-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.146

Haryono, S. (2017). Metode SEM untuk Penelitian Manajemen AMOS Lisrel PLS. Jakarta: Luxima Metro Media.

Mihas, P., & Institute, O. (2019). Learn to use an exploratory sequential mixed method design for instrument development: SAGE Publications, Limited. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781071802779.n18

Monica, S., & Hadiwinarto, H. (2021). Pengaruh Keterampilan Membuka dan Menutup Pembelajaran Terhadap Keaktifan Belajar Siswa di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK) Negeri 1 Lubuklinggau. Ad-Man-Pend: Jurnal Administrasi Manajemen Pendidikan, 3(2), 12-23. https://doi.org/10.32502/amp.v3i2.3054

Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International journal of science education, 25(9), 1049-1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199

Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survaival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS: McGraw-Hill Education.

Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K-12 levels: a systematic review of 12 years of educational research. StudieS in Science education, 50(1), 85-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.881626

Pratiwi, M., Ridwan, R., & Waskito, W. (2019). Evaluasi Teaching Factory Model CIPP. Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 3(3), 414-421. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v3i3.22205

Rezeki, S., Halim, A., Nasrullah, N., Yusrizal, Y., & Ilyas, S. (2021). Implementation of Schoology-Based E-Module Learning Media to Improve Student's Concept Understanding on Temperature and Heat Material. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 7, 14-19. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7iSpecialIssue.887

Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and Interpretations. France: Organisation for Economic Coopertaion and DEvelopment (OECD).

Stronge, J. H., & Tucker, P. D. (2020). Handbook on Teacher Evaluation: Assessing and Improving Performance. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315505534

Wilujeng, I. (2018). IPA Terintegrasi dan Pembelajarannya (Vol. 1). Yogyakarta: UNY Press.

Author Biographies

Cindy Alvianita, Universitas Jambi

Tanti Tanti, UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi

Bambang Hariyadi, Universitas Jambi

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Cindy Alvianita, Tanti Tanti, Bambang Hariyadi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).