STEM Learning for Enhancing Self-Efficacy and Control of Variables in Prospective Elementary Teachers: A Systematic Review for Quality Science Education
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v12i2.13879Published:
2026-02-25Downloads
Abstract
The objective of this study is to investigate how STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education contributes to enhancing self-efficacy and control-of-variables strategy (CVS) skills among prospective elementary school teachers, using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) methodology. This research examined 15 well-regarded international articles that were published between 2020 and 2025 and are indexed by Scopus. To guarantee a systematic, transparent, and responsible review process, the identification, selection, and inclusion of literature were carried out in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The findings concerning STEM learning models, instructional strategies, and their effects on the psychological and cognitive aspects of prospective teachers were synthesized using thematic analysis. Studies show that STEM approaches based on inquiry, project-based learning, and engineering design consistently improve prospective teachers' self-efficacy in science teaching and strengthen their ability to regularly control variables in experiments. Furthermore, the implementation of the Flipped Classroom model and the integration of digital technology contributes to meaningful learning experiences (mastery experiences), enhanced collaboration, and the development of analytical thinking and problem-solving skills. However, several challenges remain, such as the gap between theory and practice, differences in program duration, and limitations in the development of computational literacy. Overall, STEM learning contributes to preparing prospective elementary school teachers who are confident, reflective, and competent in designing inquiry and technology based science lessons to support the creation of quality science education.
Keywords:
Control variable Prospective elementary teachers Self-efficacy STEM learning Systematic reviewReferences
Ardiansyah, R., Prasetyo, Z. K., & Suryadarma, I. (2020). Implementation of STEM learning to improve science process skills of preservice teachers. Indonesian Journal of Science Education, 9(2), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i2.23813
Arifin, M., Suyidno, S., & Dewantara, D. (2022). STEM learning in teacher education to improve critical thinking skills. Indonesian Journal of Science Education, 10(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v10i1.23412
Atmojo, S. E., Lukitoaji, B. D., Rahmawati, R. D., Anggriani, M. D., & Anindya, A. P. (2025). Effects of Hybrid STEM Learning on 21st-Century Skills and Character Development in Prospective Elementary Teachers: A Mixed-Methods Study from Indonesia. Qubahan Academic Journal, 5(2), 384–401. https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v5n2a1716
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
Bandura, A. (2002). Self Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman & Company.
Berry, A., Carpendale, J., & Mulhall, P. (2025). Understanding Secondary Inservice Teachers’ Perceptions and Practices of Implementing Integrated STEM Education. Education Sciences, 15(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020255
Budgen, D., & Brereton, P. (2006). Performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering, 1051–1052. https://doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134500
Cao, X., Lu, H., Wu, Q., & Hsu, Y. (2025). Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of STEM education on students learning outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1579474
Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., Yin, H., & Chen, M. (2022). Teachers’ design thinking for STEM education: Understanding the role of pedagogical beliefs and knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 25(2), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202204_25(2).0007
Cheng, M. M. H., So, W. M. W. M., & Choy, S. C. (2023). Preservice teachers’ readiness for STEM education: Examining knowledge, beliefs, and confidence. Teaching and Teacher Education, 121, 103925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103925
Copur-Gencturk, Y., & Rodrigues, J. (2021). Content-specific noticing: A large-scale survey of mathematics teachers’ noticing. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103320
Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2021). Understanding science teachers’ implementations of integrated STEM curricular units through a phenomenological multiple case study. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00263-0
Dare, E. A., Ring-Whalen, E., & Roehrig, G. (2021). Creating a continuum of STEM models: Exploring how K–12 STEM educators define STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00276-1
DeCoito, I., & Myszkal, P. (2018). Connecting Science Instruction and Teachers’ Self-Efficacy and Beliefs in STEM Education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(6), 485–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1473748
Dewi, N. P., Gunawan, G., & Harjono, A. (2023). STEM learning to improve students’ scientific literacy. Journal of Science Education Research, 9(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2993
Dong, Y., Xu, C., Chai, C. S., & Zhai, X. (2020). Exploring the Structural Relationship Among Teachers’ Technostress, Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK), Computer Self-efficacy and School Support. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(2), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00461-5
English, L. D. (2021). Advancing elementary and middle school STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00291-x
Fitriani, H., Gunawan, G., & Sutrio, S. (2020). STEM learning in science education to improve students’ science process skills. Journal of Science Education Research, 6(2), 215–221. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v6i2.338
Hadi, S., & Kurniawan, D. (2022). STEM-based learning to improve creativity of preservice teachers. Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.26714/jps.10.2.2022.101-110
Hammack, R., Yeter, I. H., Pavlovich, C., & Boz, T. (2024). Pre-service elementary teachers’ science and engineering teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectancy: exploring the impacts of efficacy source experiences through varying course modalities. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00464-9
Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM Integration in K-12 Education. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18612
Jaipal-Jamani, K. (2023). Preservice teachers’ science learning and self-efficacy to teach with robotics-based activities: Investigating a scaffolded and a self-guided approach. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.979709
Jenkins, J. L., & Shoopman, B. T. (2019). Identifying misconceptions that limit student understanding of molecular orbital diagrams. Science Education International, 30(3), 152–157. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v30.i3.1
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Khut, S. (2024). Development and Validation of the TSTSIS Instrument to Measure Teachers’ Self-Efficacy to Teach Science Through Integrated STEM Approach. European Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/15480
Lauermann, F., & Hagen, I. (2021). Do teachers’ self-efficacy and emotional exhaustion matter for students’ academic outcomes? A meta-analysis. Educational Psychologist, 56(4), 265–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1955291
Lewis, F., Edmonds, J., & Fogg-Rogers, L. (2021). Engineering science education: the impact of a paired peer approach on subject knowledge confidence and self-efficacy levels of student teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 43(5), 793–822. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1887544
Li, S., Qi, C., Li, R., Jin, Y., Cheng, L., & Liu, G. (2025). Developing pre-service teachers’ noticing skills in mathematics PBL contexts: Effects of a video-based teacher education course. Acta Psychologica, 255, 104962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104962
Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., & Froyd, J. E. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education: a systematic review of journal publications. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6
Liu, Y., & Pásztor, A. (2022). Effects of problem-based learning instructional intervention on critical thinking in higher education: A meta-analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45(May), 101069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101069
Lotter, C., Yow, J. A., Lee, M., Zeis, J. G., & Irvin, M. J. (2020). Rural teacher leadership in science and mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 120(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12383
Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
Menon, D., Wieselmann, J. R., Haines, S., Asim, S., Koch, A., & Cox, D. (2025). Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Integrated STEM Teaching Self-Efficacy: Contributing Sources Within STEM Education Courses. AERA Open, 11(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584251321472
Moore, T. J., Glancy, A. W., Tank, K. M., Kersten, J. A., Smith, K. A., & Stohlmann, M. S. (2014). A Framework for Quality K-12 Engineering Education: Research and Development. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 4(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1069
Nadelson, L. S., Seifert, A., & Hendricks, K. (2020). Preservice teachers’ perceptions of STEM teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1702220
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Radloff, J., & Guzey, S. (2019). Investigating preservice STEM teacher preparation. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(12), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0178-9
Ribeirinha, T., & Correia, M. (2025). Enhancing pre-service teachers’ science teaching efficacy beliefs and attitudes toward science using the flipped classroom model. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1512320
Rincón, Y. R., Munárriz, A., & Magreñán Ruiz, A. (2025). Flipped Classroom or flip to foster self-regulation competencies in Mathematics in Economics and Business students. International Journal of Educational Research, 130, 102556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102556
Schwichow, M., Osterhaus, C., & Edelsbrunner, P. A. (2020). The relation between the control-of-variables strategy and content knowledge in physics in secondary school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 63, 101923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101923
Sepriyanti, N., Nelwati, S., Kustati, M., & Afriadi, J. (2022). The Effect of 21st-Century Learning on Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) and Numerical Literacy of Science Students in Indonesia based on Gender. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(2), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i2.36384
Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2020). Assessing teacher education and STEM integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00236-9
Sins, P. H. M., Savelsbergh, E. R., & Joolingen, W. R. (2020). The difficult process of scientific discovery: Exploring the development of control of variables strategy. Learning and Instruction, 65, 101243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101243
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(March), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Täschner, J., Dicke, T., Reinhold, S., & Holzberger, D. (2025). “Yes, I Can!” A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intervention Studies Promoting Teacher Self-Efficacy. Review of Educational Research, 95(1), 3–52. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231221499
Teoh, S. H., Narayanan, G., Aris, S. R. S., Ibrahim, N., & Isa, B. (2024). Factors Influencing Confidence in STEM Practices among Preservice Teachers. International Journal of Technology, 15(3), 687. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v15i3.6366
Wang, H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G., & Park, M. (2021). STEM integration in teacher education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09870-7
Weger, D. (2025). Investigating the development of pre-service teachers’ noticing for inclusive translingual instruction in secondary education: an intervention study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 28(9), 1131–1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2025.2529542
Zimmerman, C. (2020). The development of scientific reasoning skills. Developmental Review, 41, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.01.001
Zimmerman, C. (2021). Scientific reasoning: Development and assessment in educational contexts. Educational Psychologist, 56(3), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1907946
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ni Putu Murniasih S, Supriyatman, Afadil, Citra Dewi, Sarintan Kaharu, Nunuk Haryanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
