The Identification of Students' and Teachers' Misconception on Energy in North Central Timor Regency

Authors

Muhammad Amran Shidik , Lidwina Felisima Tae

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1395

Published:

2022-04-30

Issue:

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): April

Keywords:

Misconception, Physics, Energy, Teachers, Students

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Shidik, M. A., & Tae, L. F. (2022). The Identification of Students’ and Teachers’ Misconception on Energy in North Central Timor Regency. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(2), 633–640. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1395

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This study aims to identify the misconception in the students as well as the teachers on the same topic, namely Energy. This study used mixed-method research of sequential exploratory type with the research subjects of the teachers and the students in North Central Timor Regency with a sample size of 163 students and 12 physics teachers. The misconception data was obtained by giving a misconception test in the form of a multiple-choice question. There were 12 questions with 5 answer choices which were equipped with CRI (Certainty of Response Index). The results showed that the percentage of students' misconceptions for the whole question (12 items) was quite large, namely 43.66%, while students who had a good understanding of the concept were 38.80%. Nearly 18% of students did not understand the concept while 4.24% were just guessing and lucky (Lucky Guess) while the remaining 13.29% were the total students who did not understand the concept of the questions at all. Meanwhile, of the teachers, an average of 77.08% have mastered the concept of Energy. However, as many as 22.92% of the teachers had the misconception on several questions, namely (question number 5,6,7,8,9,10, and 12) with the most misconceptions on question number 7, 10, and 5. The conclusion obtained was that the misconception found in physics teachers was 22.92%. For the students, there was still a large portion of them who had misconceptions about the topic of Energy. This was caused by the lack of students' understanding of the topic of Energy

References

A’yun, Q., Harjito, H., & Nuswowati, M. (2018). Analisis Miskonsepsi siswa menggunakan tes diagnostic multiple choice berbantuan CRI (Certainty Of Response Index). Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v12i1.13302

Abbas, T., & Chaarles, T. (2010). Mixed Metodhology: Mengkombinasikan Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Pustaka Pelajar.

Aziz, F., Nurjanah, F., & Permata Sari, D. (2017). Aktualisasi TTB (Teori Taksonomi Bloom) Melalui Drama Kepahlawanan Guna Penanaman Pendidikan Karakter Pada Peserta Didik. FKIP E-PROCEEDING, 715-724. Retrieved from https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/fkip-epro/article/view/4950

Chiu, M.-H., Guo, C.-J., & Treagust, D. F. (2007). Assessing students’ conceptual understanding in science: An introduction about a national project in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 29(4), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601072774

Dayanti, P., & Nursangaji, A. (2019). Miskonsepsi Siswa Dikaji Dari Gaya Kognitif Dalam Materi Jajargenjang Di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Pendidikan Pembellajaran. 8(9). http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v8i9.35928

Faizah, K. (2016). Miskonsepsi dalam pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Darussalam: Jurnal Pendidikan, Komunikasi Dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 8(1), 115–128.

Goris, T., & Dyrenfurth, M. (2010). Students’ misconceptions in science, technology, and engineering. ASEE Illinois/Indiana Section Conference.

Hounsell, D. (1997). Understanding teaching and teaching for understanding. The Experience of Learning, 2. Retrieved from https://ttuu.itu.dk

Husnah, A. (2018). Konsep Pendidikan Holistik menurut Pemikiran Muchlas Samani dan Implementasinya pada Sistem Pendidikan Indonesia. Adabiyah : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 2(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.21070/ja.v1i3.1221

John W. Creswell. (2012). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Mixed (Vol. 3). Pustaka Pelajar.

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental Models, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Karomah, U., Syafril, S., & Haka, N. B. (2018). Miskonsepsi Dalam Pembelajaran IPA. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/spm84

Kefi, M. E., Disnawati, H., & Suddin, S. (2021). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Relasi Menggunakan Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (Jupitek), 4(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.30598/jupitekvol4iss1pp21-26

Krieger, M. H. (2012). Doing physics: How physicists take hold of the world. Indiana University Press.

Laksana, D. N. L. (2017). The Effectiveness of Inquiry-Based Learning For Natural Science Learning In Elementary School. Journal of Education Technology, 1(1), 1–5. Retrieved from https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JET/article/view/10077

León, J. A., & Escudero, I. (2015). Understanding causality in science discourse for middle and high school students. Summary task as a strategy for improving comprehension. In Improving reading comprehension of middle and high school students (pp. 75–98). Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-14735-2_4

Lexy J. Moleong. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Rosdakarya.

Nabila, S. R., & Rachmasari, S. (2021). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi dan Kesulitan Siswa pada Materi Usaha dan Energi. Jurnal Kependidikan Betara, 2(1), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.48109/jkb.v2i1.57

Novitasari, F., Supriadi, B., & Maryani, M. (2019). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika Angkatan 2018 Universitas Jember Pada Pemahaman Konsep Listrik Statis Dan Dinamis. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 8(4), 222–225. https://doi.org/10.19184/jpf.v8i4.15228

Nurulwati, N., Veloo, A., & Ali, R. M. (2014). Suatu tinjauan tentang jenis-jenis dan penyebab miskonsepsi fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 2(1), 87–95. Retrieved from http://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/JPSI/article/view/7636

Olympiou, G., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2012). Blending physical and virtual manipulatives: An effort to improve students’ conceptual understanding through science laboratory experimentation. Science Education, 96(1), 21–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20463

Ozdem-Yilmaz, Y., & Bilican, K. (2020). Discovery Learning—Jerome Bruner. In B. Akpan & T. J. Kennedy (Eds.), Science Education in Theory and Practice: An Introductory Guide to Learning Theory (pp. 177–190). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_13

Perkins, D. (2006). Constructivism and troublesome knowledge. In Overcoming barriers to student understanding (pp. 57–71). Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/...david-perkins

Pines, A. L., & West, L. H. (1986). Conceptual understanding and science learning: An interpretation of research within a sources-of-knowledge framework. Science Education, 70(5), 583–604. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730700510

Primarni, A. (2017). Konsep Pendidikan Holistik Dalam Perspektif Islam. Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 3(05), Article 05. https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v3i05.42

Putri, A. N., & Hindrasti, N. E. K. (2020). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Pada Konsep Evolusi Menggunakan Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Jurnal Kiprah, 8(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.31629/kiprah.v8i1.1604

Rahmah, C. M., Nasir, M., & Bahri, S. (2020). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Menggunakan Certainty of Response Index (CRI) pada Materi Kinematika Gerak Lurus di MAN 4 Aceh Besar. Jurnal Phi; Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Terapan, 2018(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.22373/p-jpft.v2018i2.7457

Rehalat, A. (2016). Model Pembelajaran Pemrosesan Informasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial, 23(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpis.v23i2.1625

Ruwaida, H. (2019). Proses Kognitif dalam Taksonomi Bloom Revisi: Analisis Kemampuan Mencipta (C6) Pada Pembelajaran Fikih di MI Miftahul Anwar Desa Banua Lawas. Al-Madrasah: Jurnal Pendidikan Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 4(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.35931/am.v4i1.168

Safriana, S., & Fatmi, N. (2018). Analisis miskonsepsi materi mekanika pada mahasiswa calon guru melalui force concept inventory dan certainty of response index. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 6(2), 90–94. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v6i2.11897

Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching:Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Alfbeta.

Sundari, S., & Fauziati, E. (2021). Implikasi Teori Belajar Bruner dalam Model Pembelajaran Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Papeda. 3(2). https://doi.org/10.36232/jurnalpendidikandasar.v3i2.1206

Ulya, U. S. U., & Utami, Y. T. S. (2021). Certainty of Response Index Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa dengan Metode Certainty of Response Index (CRI) pada Materi Usaha dan Energi: Jurnal Kependidikan Betara, 2(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.48109/jkb.v2i1.47

Unaenah, E., Hidyah, A., Aditya, A. M., Nur, N., Maghfiroh, N., Dewanti, R. R., & Safitri, T. (2020). Teori Brunner Pada Konsep Bangun Datar Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial. 2(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.36088/nusantara.v2i2.840

Venville, G. J., & Dawson, V. M. (2010). The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10 students’ argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 952–977. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20358

Yuliati, Y. (2017). Miskonsepsi siswa pada pembelajaran IPA serta remediasinya. Bio Educatio, 2(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.31949/be.v2i2.1197

Author Biographies

Muhammad Amran Shidik, Universitas Timor

Lidwina Felisima Tae, Universitas Timor

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Muhammad Amran Shidik, Lidwina Felisima Tae

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).