Birds as Biodiversity Barometers in the Anthropocene: Updating Concepts, Correcting Biases, and Scaling Indicators for Policy Impact
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v12i2.14056Published:
2026-02-28Downloads
Abstract
Birds are powerful biodiversity indicators due to their wide distribution and responsiveness to environmental pressures. Building on prior reviews, we synthesize methodological advances to update the Multi-species Bird Index (MSI) field. This study recaps limitations like European/breeding-season biases and uncertainty gaps while integrating recent studies that expand analytical rigor. Advances in passive acoustic monitoring, remote sensing, and trait-based models now improve species selection and reduce detectability errors. We translate these into practical guidance for policy application and a research agenda emphasizing seasonal completeness. The synthesis underscores birds’ role as decision ready barometers and provides a blueprint for robust monitoring. Birds serve as premier biodiversity barometers due to their cosmopolitan distribution and sensitivity to anthropogenic pressures. However, traditional Multi species Bird Indicators (MSIs) often suffer from significant Europe-centric and breeding-season biases that limit their global policy impact. This study synthesizes recent methodological breakthroughs to update the MSI framework. We evaluate the integration of Passive Acoustic Monitoring (PAM), high-resolution remote sensing (ALS LiDAR), and trait-based selection criteria into standard monitoring protocols. Our synthesis reveals that combining automated sensor networks with hierarchical Bayesian models effectively mitigates detectability errors and fills critical data gaps in under-represented regions. Furthermore, linking avian indicators with carbon sequestration and equity metrics allows for more robust prioritization of Nature based Solutions (NbS). We provide a practical blueprint for next-generation indicators that emphasize seasonal completeness and statistical rigor. By shifting from retrospective reports to forward-looking policy tools, these refined barometers can more accurately track progress toward global biodiversity targets.
Keywords:
Biodiversity Indicators Conservation Policy Multispecies Bird Index (MSI) Passive Acoustic Monitoring (PAM) Remote SensingReferences
Aghaloo, K., & Sharifi, A. (2025). Integrated spatial prioritization of urban nature-based solutions for climate adaptation, mitigation, and justice. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 32(2), 224–241. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2024.2424988
Ambarwati, R., & Sischasari, D. (2025). Optimizing operational costs to improve accessibility of higher education: A novel integration of activity-based costing and Lean management. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 1–22.
Arizaga, J., Laso, M., Aizpurua, O., & Carrascal, L. M. (2026). Beyond coverage: Effectiveness of Natura 2000 network in conserving breeding bird populations in a highly anthropogenic region. Journal for Nature Conservation, 90. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127194
Arslan, R. C. (2019). How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 169–187. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838783
Bateman, B. L., Feng, M.-L. E., Grand, J., Taylor, L., Wu, J. X., Saunders, S. P., Reault, S., & Wilsey, C. B. (2025). A nature-based conservation framework that aligns opportunities for bird biodiversity, climate mitigation, and human equity. Scientific Reports, 15(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-16693-z
Bosma, C., & Hein, L. (2023). The climate and land use change nexus: Implications for designing adaptation and conservation investment strategies in Sub-Saharan Africa. Sustainable Development, 31(5), 3811–3830. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2627
Cameletti, M., & Biondi, F. (2019). Hierarchical modeling of space-time dendroclimatic fields: Comparing a frequentist and a Bayesian approach. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, 51(1), 115–127. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230430.2019.1585175
Couturier, T., Gaillard, L., Vadier, A., Dautrey, E., Mathey, J., & Besnard, A. (2024). Airborne imagery does not preclude detectability issues in estimating bird colony size. Scientific Reports, 14(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53961-w
Díaz, S., Pascual, U., Stenseke, M., Martín-López, B., Watson, R. T., Molnár, Z., Hill, R., Chan, K. M. A., Baste, I. A., Brauman, K. A., Polásky, S., Church, A., Lonsdale, M., Larigauderie, A., Leadley, P. W., van Oudenhoven, A. P. E., van der Plaat, F., Schröter, M., Lavorel, S., … Shirayama, Y. (2018). Assessing nature’s contributions to people: Recognizing culture, and diverse sources of knowledge, can improve assessments. Science, 359(6373), 270–272. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8826
Diprose, G., Greenaway, A., & Moorhouse, B. (2022). Making Visible More Diverse Nature Futures through Citizen Science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 7(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5334/CSTP.442
Drechsler, M. (2026). Result-Based vs. Action-Based Payments in Spatially Heterogeneous Landscapes: A Systematic Model-Based Comparison. Environmental and Resource Economics, 89(2), 10.
Faye, S. L. B., Diongue, F. B., Ndao, A., Diop, B., Sow, G. H. C., Dia, N., Diakhate, F., Gadiaga, T., Dieye, P. S., Gueye, O. K. D., Sall, Y., Seck, I., Guèye, Y. B., Massaly, A., Seydi, M., & Sy, I. (2026). Advancing epidemic intelligence: Evaluating Senegal’s mpox surveillance system and readiness for AI-driven predictive modelling. Frontiers in Public Health, 14. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1742888
Fraixedas, S., Lehikoinen, A., & Lindén, A. (2015). Impacts of climate and land‐use change on wintering bird populations in Finland. Journal of Avian Biology, 46(1), 63–72.
Gonc¸alves-Souza, T., Chaves, L. S., Boldorini, G. X., Ferreira, N., Gusmão, R. A. F., Perônico, P. B., Sanders, N. J., & Teresa, F. B. (2023). Bringing light onto the Raunkiæran shortfall: A comprehensive review of traits used in functional animal ecology. Ecology and Evolution, 13(4). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10016
Gregory, R. D., Škorpilová, J., Voříšek, P., & Butler, S. (2019). An analysis of trends, uncertainty and species selection shows contrasting trends of widespread forest and farmland birds in Europe. Ecological Indicators, 103, 676–687. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.064
Hagemann, N., Gerling, C., Hölting, L., Kernecker, M., Markova-Nenova, N. N., Wätzold, F., Wendler, J., & Cord, A. F. (2025). Improving result-based schemes for nature conservation in agricultural landscapes—Challenges and best practices from selected European countries. Regional Environmental Change, 25(1), 12.
Hansen, A. J., Noble, B. P., Veneros, J., East, A., Goetz, S. J., Supples, C., E.m Watson, J. E. M., Jantz, P. A., Pillay, R., Jetz, W., Ferrier, S., Grantham, H. S., Evans, T. D., Ervin, J., Venter, O., & Virnig, A. L. S. (2021). Toward monitoring forest ecosystem integrity within the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. Conservation Letters, 14(4). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12822
Haron, A. H., Holderied, M. W., & Windsor, S. (2026). Acoustic flow velocity manipulations affect the flight velocity of free-ranging pipistrelle bats. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 293(2063). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.2481
Harwood, T. D., Donohue, R. J., Williams, K. J., Ferrier, S., McVicar, T. R., Newell, G., & White, M. (2016). Habitat Condition Assessment System: A new way to assess the condition of natural habitats for terrestrial biodiversity across whole regions using remote sensing data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(9), 1050–1059. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12579
Kapsar, K., Sullender, B. K., & Kuletz, K. J. (2026). A multiscale seasonal examination of the risk of harm to seabirds from vessels based on co-occurrence in Alaskan waters. Conservation Biology, 40(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70115
Kumar, P., & Sahu, S. (2020). Composition, diversity and foraging guilds of avifauna in agricultural landscapes In Panipat, Haryana, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 12(1), 15140–15153. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.5267.12.1.15140-15153
Li, S., Li, S., Li, J., Yuan, L., & Geng, J. (2025). Bridging the Gap: Forecasting China’s Dual-Carbon Talent Crisis and Strategic Pathways for Higher Education. Sustainability, 17(16), 7190.
Ling, Q., Qu, J., Kang, R., Dang, X., Guo, Q., Ren, J., Wei, Y., Yang, C., & Li, W. (2025). Landslide susceptibility in Xiji county: A coupled modeling approach with dynamic factors. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 84(12), 1–19.
M Susana, O.-O., & Geneletti, D. (2023). Prioritizing urban nature-based solutions to support scaling-out strategies: A case study in Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 102. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107158
McClure, E. C., Sievers, M., Brown, C. J., Buelow, C. A., Ditria, E. M., Hayes, M. A., Pearson, R. M., Tulloch, V. J. D., Unsworth, R. K. F., & Connolly, R. M. (2020). Artificial Intelligence Meets Citizen Science to Supercharge Ecological Monitoring. Patterns, 1(7). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2020.100109
McDonald, J. A., Helmstedt, K. J., Bode, M., Coutts, S., McDonald-Madden, E., & Possingham, H. P. (2018). Improving private land conservation with outcome-based biodiversity payments. Journal of Applied Ecology, 55(3), 1476–1485. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13071
McGovern, J. M., Giese, J. C., & Schulte, L. A. (2024). Springtime bird use of agricultural landscapes examined by using autonomous recording units. Journal of Field Ornithology, 95(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5751/JFO-00399-950101
Menashe‐Oren, A., & Bocquier, P. (2025). The potential of internal migration to shape rural and urban populations across Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Population and Development Review, 51(1), 389–419.
Mitchell, A. E., Stainsby, A., & Morrissey, C. A. (2025). Increased avian bioacoustic diversity without lost profit after planting perennial vegetation in marginal cropland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 388. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2025.109663
Odedra, K. N., Shukla, K., & Jadeja, B. (2026). Biodiversity soil feedbacks in halophytic ecosystems evidenced by seasonal dynamics in arid coastal zones. Discover Plants, 3(1), 19.
O’Reilly, E., Gregory, R. D., Anton, M., Brotons, L., Escandell, V., Gamero, A., Herrando, S., Jiguet, F., Kamp, J., Klvaňová, A., Kmecl, P., Øien, I. J., Paquet, J.-Y., Reif, J., Šilarová, E., Stokke, B. G., Strebel, N., Teufelbauer, N., Trautmann, S., … Butler, S. J. (2025). Developing spatially comparable biodiversity indicators using objective scale-dependent species selection. Ecological Indicators, 172. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113327
Patil, Y., Fathima, R., Campbell, B., Janney, D., Hudnurkar, S., & R, R. (2024). Review of Earth Observation Techniques and Citizen Science Approach for Biodiversity Hotspot Study. International Journal of Environmental Impacts, 7(4), 753–767. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijei.070416
Rigal, S., & Knape, J. (2024). Investigating the heterogeneity within Wild bird indices in Europe. Biological Conservation, 290. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110452
Sakharov, A. (2018). Shift in the United States climate policy and the Arctic Council agenda. International Organisations Research Journal, 13(1), 66–79. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2018-01-04
Singh, A., Rathour, A., Gupta, R. K., Kumar, V. R., Acharya, S., & Jamuna, K. V. (2025). Employing the DPSIR Framework (Drivers-Pressures-State-Impact-Response) to Analyze Water Pollution Trends. Natural and Engineering Sciences, 10(3), 261–274. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.28978/nesciences.1811122
Telila, Z., Amare, A., & Tolera, T. (2025). Evaluating forest cover change and its impact on ecosystem services in Gargeda state forest western Ethiopia. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 34795.
Thaxter, C. B., Holt, C. A., Austin, G. E., Reneerkens, J., Koffijberg, K., Hornman, M., Frost, T. M., Calbrade, N. A., Mitchell, C., & Brides, K. (2025). The use of monitoring data from north-west Europe as indicators for the health of Arctic-breeding waterbird populations. Bird Conservation International, 35, e24.
Troian, A., Gomes, M. C., Tiecher, T., Berbel, J., & Gutiérrez-Martín, C. (2021). The drivers-pressures-state-impact-response model to structure cause-effect relationships between agriculture and aquatic ecosystems. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(16). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169365
Wa Maina, C., & Njoroge, P. (2025). Comparing point counts, passive acoustic monitoring, citizen science and machine learning for bird species monitoring in the Mount Kenya ecosystem. Philosophical Transactions B, 380(1928), 20240057.
Yu, Z., Zhao, X., Wang, K., & Qiu, L. (2025). Spatial characterisation of social-ecological systems for ecological restoration along the coast cities of Zhejiang, China. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 30156.
Zewdu, D., Krishnan C, C. M., Nikhil Raj, P. P. N., Makadi, Y. C., Barati, M. K., & Arlikatti, S. (2025). Interactions of land use, land cover, and climate change: A case study of Raichur District, Karnataka, India. Environmental Challenges, 19. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2025.101166
Zhengxin, Z. (2026). Co-evolution of ecosystem services and land use/land cover change in the mountains of Eastern China.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Daud Yusuf, Dewi Wahyuni K Baderan, Sukirman Rahim, Zuliyanto Zakaria
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
