Symbolic Communication Ability of Prospective Physics Teacher Students
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1429Published:
2022-04-30Issue:
Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): AprilKeywords:
Communication ability, Symbolic, Prospective physics teacherResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
Research in the field of physics education, only focuses on verbal communication such as the ability to ask questions. While communication skills are not only limited to the ability to ask questions. But there is an equally important symbolic communication. The indicators of symbolic communication in question: state the ideas of physics in the form of pictures, interpreting images into physical models, explain physical phenomena into problem solving procedures. The population in this study were all students majoring in Physics Education in the fifth semester of class 2019 and third semester of 2020, and the sample consisted of 38 students. The symbolic communication abilities of prospective physics teacher students at Samudra University are as follows:Â The indicator states physics ideas in the form of pictures, 24 people or 63.16% of students can state physics ideas in the form of pictures correctly and completely, The indicator interprets the picture into the physics model, only 1 person or 2.63% of students can connect the picture into the physics model correctly and completely, Indicators explain physical phenomena into problem solving procedures, there are 17 people or 44.74% of students who can explain solving procedures correctly and completelyReferences
Andriani, N., Saparini, S., & Akhsan, H. (2018). Kemampuan Literasi Sains Fisika Siswa SMP Kelas VII Di Sumatera Selatan Menggunakan Kerangka PISA (Program for International Student Assesment). Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 6(3), 278. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v6i3.5288
Ayunda, D. S., Halim, A., Suhrawardi, I., Murniati, A. R., & Irwandi. (2021). The Impact of Brainstorming Method on Students’ Questioning and Inductive Thinking Skills in Static Fluid. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2320(March). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0037652
Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory of Mass Communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265–299. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03
BİLİR, F. P., Avanoğlu, A. E., & Şahin, N. (2021). Examination of communication skills of physical education and sports teacher candidate students: Example of faculty of sports sciences. Journal of Human Sciences, 18(4), 737–748. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v18i4.6253
Dimmel, J. K., & Herbst, P. G. (2017). Secondary mathematics teachers’ attitudes toward alternative communication practices when doing proofs in geometry. Teaching and Teacher Education, 68, 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.08.018
Firdiani, N. H., Herman, T., & Hasanah, A. (2020). Gender and mathematical communication ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032095
Khan, A., Khan, S., Zia-Ul-Islam, S., & Khan, M. (2017). Communication Skills of a Teacher and Its Role in the Development of the Students’ Academic Success. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(1), 18–21.
Kirana, I. E., & Kusairi, S. (2019). Profil Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan IPA dalam Kasus Grafik Kinematika Satu Dimensi. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 4(3), 363. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i3.12113
Kukliansky, I. (2016). Student’s Conceptions in Statistical Graph’s Interpretation. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n4p262
Lomibao, L. S., Luna, C. A., & Namoco, R. A. (2016). The Influence of Mathematical Communication on Students’ Mathematics Performance and Anxiety. American Journal of Educational Research, 4(5), 378–382. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-4-5-3
Momchilova, A., & Ilchev, I. (2016). Interactive Methods in Physical Education and Sport Lessons for Development of Communication Skills for the Fourth Grade Students. Research in Kinesiology. 44(1), 3–12.
Moore-Russo, D., Viglietti, J. M., Chiu, M. M., & Bateman, S. M. (2013). Teachers’ spatial literacy as visualization, reasoning, and communication. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.012
Nurhayati, D. I., Yulianti, D., & Mindyarto, B. N. (2019). Journal Bahan Ajar Berbasis Problem Based Learning pada Materi Gerak Lurus untuk. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 8(2), 218.
Nurjannah, A., Gani, A., Evendi, E., Syukri, M., & Elisa, E. (2020). Question webs-based learning: Science process skills and scientific questioning skills of students on harmonic motion topic. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 4(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v4i1.4402
Purba, J., Maimunah., Roza, Y. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematika Siswa SMP pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Lengkung. EKSAKTA : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran MIPA, 5(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v4i1.1-8
Purwana, U., Rusdiana, D., & Liliawati, W. (2020). Pengujian Kemampuan Menginterpretasikan Grafik Kinematika Calon Guru Fisika: the Polytomous Rasch Analysis. ORBITA: Jurnal Kajian, Inovasi Dan Aplikasi Pendidikan Fisika, 6(2), 259. https://doi.org/10.31764/orbita.v6i2.3264
Ramadhani, L., Johar, R., & Ansari, B. I. (2021). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Ditinjau Dari Keterlibatan Siswa Melalui Pendekatan Realistic Mathematics Education (Rme). AXIOM : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Matematika, 10(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.30821/axiom.v10i1.8825
Ramadina, A., & Rosdiana, L. (2021). Keterampilan Komunikasi Siswa Setelah Diterapkan Strategi Active Knowledge Sharing Ketika Pembelajaran Daring. Pensa E-Jurnal : Pendidikan Sains, 9(2), 247–251.
Randita, C.H., Salam, M., & Kodirun, K. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Integratif Terhadap Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Kelas Ix Smp Negeri 8 Kendari. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 99–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.36709/jppm.v6i2.9120
Rohmah, L., Handono, S.B.P., & Yushardi. (2018). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam memecahkan masalah fisika berdasarkan polya pada pokok bahasan fluida statis di SMAN Jember. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 7(4), 328–333. https://doi.org/10.19184/jpf.v7i4.9653
Sabirin, M. (2014). Representasi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 33. https://doi.org/10.18592/jpm.v1i2.49
Schermerhorn, B. P., & Thompson, J. R. (2019). Physics students’ construction of differential length vectors in an unconventional spherical coordinate system. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1), 10111. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010111
Smith, H. A. (1979). Nonverbal Communication in Teaching. In Review of Educational Research (Vol. 49, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543049004631
Subali, B., Rusdiana, D., Firman, H., & Kaniawati, I. (2015). Analisis Kemampuan Interpretasi Grafik Kinematika pada Mahasiswa Calon Guru Fisika. Prosiding Simposium Nasional Inovasi Dan Pembelajaran Sains 2015, 2015(Snips), 269–272.
Sudarmo, N. A., Lesmono, A. D., & Harijanto, A. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Berargumentasi Ilmiah Siswa Pada Konsep Termodinamika. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 7(2), 196–201.
Teledahl, A. (2015). Different modes in teachers’ discussions of students’ mathematical texts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.06.002
Trianggono, M. M. (2017). Analisis Kausalitas Pemahaman Konsep Dengan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Pada Pemecahan Masalah Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Keilmuan (JPFK), 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.25273/jpfk.v3i1.874
Ustun, U. D., Ersoy, A., & Berk, A. (2017). An Investigation on Time Management and Communication Skills of Physical Education and Sport Students. Sport Şi Societate, 17(Special), 20–24.
Wahyuni. (2019). Hubungan antara Kemampuan Membaca dengan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematik Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Seminar Nasional Multidisplin Ilmu, 2(1), 286–293.
Wahyuni, Panjaitan, C. J., Nuraida, & Husna, N. (2021). Etnomatematika Pada Permainan Kelereng Di Pesisir Aceh Dan Hubungannya Dengan Matematika Sekolah. Jurnal Mathematic Paedagogic, V(2). https://doi.org/10.36294/jmp.v5i2.1743
Yustiandi, & Saepuzaman, D. (2017). Profil Kemampuan Interpretasi Grafik Kinematika Siswa Sma Kelas X. Gravity: Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Fisika GRAVITY, 3(1), 30–39.
Author Biographies
Wahyuni Wahyuni, IAIN Langsa
Mathematics Education Study Program, IAIN Langsa, Langsa City, Indonesia
Nuril Husna, Universitas Syiah Kuala
Science Education Study Program
Evendi, Universitas Syiah Kuala
Physics Education Study Program FKIP Syiah Kuala University
Rini Safitri, Universitas Syiah Kuala
Physics Education Study Program FKIP Syiah Kuala University
Siti Habsari Pratiwi, IAIN Langsa
Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Wahyuni Wahyuni, Nuril Husna, Evendi, Rini Safitri, Siti Habsari Pratiwi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).