Vol. 12 No. 11 (2026): In Press
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

Statistical Physics Learning Difficulties and Instructional Strategies: A Systematic Literature Review Supporting Quality Science Education (SDG 4)

Authors

DENS E. S. I. Asbanu , Parlindungan Sinaga , Lilik Hasanah , Nanang Winarno

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v12i11.15747

Published:

2026-11-05

Downloads

Abstract

This systematic literature review (SLR) examines the topics in statistical physics that students find difficult, the factors underlying these difficulties, and the instructional strategies used to address them. Following PRISMA guidelines, 153 records were identified from Scopus through Publish or Perish, reduced through identification, screening, and eligibility stages to 17 included articles published between 2000 and 2024. The most challenging topics are microscopic/macroscopic states, entropy, the Boltzmann factor and distribution, partition functions, and the Fermi-Dirac distribution. Difficulties stem mainly from limited mathematical and representational skills, scarce visualization media, and the high abstraction of the concepts. Reported strategies, including computer simulation, laboratory experiments, inquiry-based learning, Clicker Question Sequences, educational games, and Excel- or Desmos-based simulation, show promising but unevenly evaluated effectiveness: most are theoretical proposals, while only a minority report empirical classroom testing. The novelty of this review lies in showing that, despite twenty-four years of proposed solutions, comprehensive effectiveness evaluation and supporting instructional materials remain scarce. These findings give instructors and curriculum designers an empirical basis for prioritizing which statistical physics topics and strategies most need rigorous, classroom-tested development

Keywords:

Bose-Einstein Computer simulation Fermi-Dirac Maxwell-Boltzmann Statistical physics

References

Abdurrahman, A. (2019). Implementating Multiple Representation-Based Worksheet to Develop Critical Thinking Skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10271a

Ainsworth, S. (2008). The Educational Value of Multiple-Representations when Learning Complex Scientific Concepts. In: Gilbert, J.K., Reiner, M., Nakhleh, M. (eds) Visualization: Theory and Practice in Science Education. Models and Modeling in Science Education, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5267-5_9

Atarés, L., Canet, M. J., Trujillo, M., Benlloch-Dualde, J. V., Royo, J. P., & Fernandez-March, A. (2021). Helping Pregraduate Students Reach Deep Understanding of the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Education Sciences, 11(9), 539. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090539

Azril, H., Shaffril, M., & Farid, S. (2020). The ABC of Systematic Literature Review: The Basic Methodological Guidance for Beginners. Quality & Quantity, (0123456789). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01059-6

Bahri, Y., Kadmon, J., Pennington, J., Schoenholz, S. S., Sohl-dickstein, J., & Ganguli, S. (2020). Statistical Mechanics of Deep Learning. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 11, 501–528. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031119-050745

Bahtaji, M. A. A. (2020). Improving Students Graphing Skills and Conceptual Understanding Using Explicit Graphical Physics Instructions. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(4), 843–853. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v15i4.5063

Baran, M. (2018). Learning Physics Through Project-Based Learning Game Techniques. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11215a

Battaglia, O. R. (2016). An Inquiry-Based Approach to Maxwell Distribution: A Case Study with Engineering Students. European Journal of Physics, 34(4), 975–990. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/34/4/975

Battaglia, O. R., Fazio, C., & Sperandeo-Mineo, R. M. (2015). An Inquiry-Based Approach to Maxwell Distribution: A Case Study with Engineering Students. European Journal of Physics, 34(4), 975–990. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/34/4/975

Beltran, L. (2023). Quantum Bose–Einstein Statistics for Indistinguishable Concepts in Human Language. Foundations of Science, 28(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-021-09794-1

Benacka, J. (2016). Numerical Modelling with Spreadsheets as a Means to Promote STEM to High School Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology, 12(4), 947–964. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1236a

Bezen, S. (2016). Conceptual Comprehension of Pre-Service Physics Teachers Towards 1st Law of Thermodynamics. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10157a

Bhattacharyya, D., & Dawlaty, J. M. (2019). Teaching Entropy from Phase Space Perspective: Connecting the Statistical and Thermodynamic Views Using a Simple One-Dimensional Model. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(10), 2208–2216. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00134

Campos, E., Armenta, I. H., & Barniol, P. (2020). Physics Education: Systematic Mapping of Educational Innovation Articles. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.29

Ellis, F. B. (2018). An Experimental Approach to Teaching and Learning Elementary Statistical Mechanics. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(1), 78–82. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed085p78

Ellis, F. B., Ellis, D. C., & Lambert, F. L. (2018). An Experimental Approach to Teaching and Learning Elementary Statistical Mechanics. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(9), 1191. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed085p1191

Engelhardt, L., Puerto, M. L. D., & Chonacky, N. (2015). Simple and Synergistic Ways to Understand the Boltzmann Distribution Function. American Journal of Physics, 83(9), 787–793. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4923204

Farhan, S., Sharafee, M., Ismail, S., Bonilla-petriciolet, A., Ben, A., & Erto, A. (2018). Synthesis and Characterization of a Novel Amphoteric Adsorbent Coating for Anionic and Cationic Dyes Adsorption: Experimental Investigation and Statistical Physics Modelling. Chemical Engineering Journal, 351(June), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.06.092

Fernández, F. M. (2015). A Simple Way of Approximating the Canonical Partition Functions in Statistical Mechanics. European Journal of Physics, 36(5), 55026. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/36/5/055026

Filho, O. L. S., & Ferreira, M. (2021). Indistinguishability and Counting: Teaching the Role of Different Interpretations in Quantum Mechanics. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Fisica, 43, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9126-RBEF-2020-0508

Flegr, S., Kuhn, J., & Scheiter, K. (2023). Computers & Education When the Whole is Greater than the Sum of Its Parts: Combining Real and Virtual Experiments in Science Education. Computer and Education, 197(June 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104745

Furtlehner, C. (2020). Statistical Physics Methods for Machine Learning and Traffic Forecasting. HAl Open Science. Retrieved from https://inria.hal.science/tel-02917159v1/document

Galili, I. (2018). Physics and Mathematics as Interwoven Disciplines in Science Education. Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9958-y

Hahn, L. (2022). Eye Tracking in Physics Education Research : A Systematic Literature Review. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(1), 13102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.013102

Hanson, R. M., & Michalek, B. (2006). Give Them Money: The Boltzmann Game, a Classroom or Laboratory Activity Modeling Entropy Changes and the Distribution of Energy in Chemical Systems. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(4), 581–588. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed083p581

Herrlinger, S., Höffler, T. N., Opfermann, M., & Leutner, D. (2016). When Do Pictures Help Learning from Expository Text ? Multimedia and Modality Effects in Primary Schools. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9525-y

Husnaini, S. J., & Chen, S. (2019). Effects of Guided Inquiry Virtual and Physical Laboratories on Conceptual Understanding, Inquiry Performance, Scientific Inquiry Self-Efficacy, and Enjoyment. Physical Review Physics Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010119

Jameson, G., & Brüschweiler, R. (2020). Active Learning Approach for an Intuitive Understanding of the Boltzmann Distribution by Basic Computer Simulations. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(10), 3910–3913. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00559

Jerath, K., Ray, A., Brennan, S., & Gayah, V. V. (2015). Dynamic Prediction of Vehicle Cluster Distribution in Mixed Traffic: A Statistical Mechanics-Inspired Method. IEE Transactions on Intelligent Transpotation System, 1–11.

Justice, P., Marshman, E., & Singh, C. (2020a). Development and Validation of a Sequence of Clicker Questions for Helping Students Learn Addition of Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics. Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevstper.9.010101

Justice, P., Marshman, E., & Singh, C. (2020b). Student Understanding of Fermi Energy, the Fermi-Dirac Distribution and Total Electronic Energy of a Free Electron Gas. European Journal of Physics, 41(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ab537c

Karam, R., & Krey, O. (2015). Quod Erat Demonstrandum: Understanding and Explaining Equations in Physics Teacher Education. Science & Education, 24, 661–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9743-0

Koerfer, E. (2024). Exploring Student Reasoning in Statistical Mechanics: Identifying Challenges in Problem-Solving Groups. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.20.010105

Koerfer, E., & Gregorcic, B. (2024). Exploring Student Reasoning in Statistical Mechanics: Identifying Challenges in Problem-Solving Groups. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 20(1), 10105. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.20.010105

Lamine, A. B. (2017). Adsorption of Diclofenac and Nimesulide on Activated Carbon: Statistical Physics Modeling and Effect of Adsorbate Size. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2017.05.019

Lee, K.-C. (2001). How to Teach Statistical Thermal Physics in an Introductory Physics Course. American Journal of Physics, 69(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1287719

Liu, C., Chen, S., Chi, C., Chien, K.-P., Liu, Y., & Chou, T.-L. (2017). The Effects of Clickers with Different Teaching Strategies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(5), 603–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116674213

Müller, R. (2014). The Boltzmann Factor: A Simplified Derivation. European Journal of Physics, 35(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/35/5/055002

Palmgren, E., & Rasa, T. (2024). Modelling Roles of Mathematics in Physics. Science & Education, 33(2), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00393-5

Pang, X., Sellaoui, L., Franco, D., Dotto, G. L., Georgin, J., Bajahzar, A., Belmabrouk, H., Lamine, A. B., & Li, Z. (2019). Research Institute of Advanced Interdisciplinary, College of Life Sciences, Qingdao Laboratory of Quantum and Statistical Physics, LR18ES18, Monastir University, Faculty of Chemical Engineering Department, Federal University of Santa Maria – UFSM. Chemical Engineering Journal, 122101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.122101

Quale, A. (2012). On the Use of a Standard Spreadsheet to Model Physical Systems in School Teaching. Physics Education, 355. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/47/3/355

Redish, E. F. (2023). Using Math in Physics: 6. The Physics Teacher, 656(May 2021), 651–656. https://doi.org/10.1119/5.0150860

Redish, E. F., & Kuo, E. (2015). Language of Physics, Language of Math: Disciplinary Culture and Dynamic Epistemology. Science & Education, 561–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9749-7

Rodriguez, L., Veen, J. T. V. D., Anjewierden, A., Berg, E. V. D., & Jong, T. D. (2020). Designing Inquiry-Based Learning Environments for Quantum Physics Education in Secondary Schools. Physics Education, 55(6), 065026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/abb346

Saw, K. G. (2017). Cognitive Load Theory and the Use of Worked Examples as an Instructional Strategy in Physics for Distance Learners: A Preliminary Study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(4), 142–159. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.340405

Sayer, R., Marshman, E., & Singh, C. (2016). Case Study Evaluating Just-In-Time Teaching and Peer Instruction Using Clickers in a Quantum Mechanics Course. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 020133, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020133

Sharma, S., & Ahluwalia, P. K. (2015). Diagnosing Alternative Conceptions of Fermi Energy Among Undergraduate Students. European Journal of Physics, 33(4), 883–895. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/33/4/883

Shi, W-Z., Ma, L., & Wang, J. (2020). Effects of Inquiry-Based Teaching on Chinese University Students’ Epistemologies About Experimental Physics and Learning Performance. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(2), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.289

Shubha, S., & Meera, B. N. (2019). The Effect of Visual Representation in Developing Conceptual Understanding of Magnetic Force. Journal of Formative Design in Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-019-00031-4 The

Smith, T. I. (2015). Student Understanding of the Boltzmann Factor. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020123

Smith, T. I., Christensen, W. M., Mountcastle, D. B., & Thompson, J. R. (2015). Identifying Student Difficulties with Entropy, Heat Engines, and the Carnot Cycle. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 020116, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020116

Smith, T. I., Mountcastle, D. B., & Thompson, J. R. (2013). Identifying Student Difficulties with Conflicting Ideas in Statistical Mechanics. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1513, 386–389. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4789733

Smith, T. I., Thompson, J. R., & Mountcastle, D. B. (2010). Addressing Student Difficulties with Statistical Mechanics: The Boltzmann Factor. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1289(February), 305–308. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3515230

Sozbilir, M. (2003). Whats Student’s Understanding from Entropy: A Review od Selected Literature. Journal of Baltic Science Education, (1), 21–27. Retrieved from https://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/files/pdf/vol2/21-27.Sozbilir_JBSE_Vol.2_No.1.pdf

Styer, D., & Styer, D. (2019). Entropy as Disorder: History. The Physics, 454. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5126822

Uddin, Z., Ahsanuddin, M., & Khan, D. A. (2017). Teaching Physics Using Microsoft Excel. Physics Education, 52. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/aa7919

Umrani, S., Rajper, S., Talpur, S. H., Shah, I. A., & Shujrah, A. (2020). Games Based Earning: A Case of Learning Physics Using Angry Birds. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 13(36), 3778–3784. https://doi.org/10.17485/IJST/v13i36.853

Wang, J., Guo, D., & Jou, M. (2015). Computers in Human Behavior A Study on the Effects of Model-Based Inquiry Pedagogy on Students’ Inquiry Skills in a Virtual Physics Lab. Computer in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.043

Wang, Y., Zhang, L., & Pang, M. (2024). Virtual Experiments in Physics Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Research in Science & Technological Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2024.2327995

Wieman, C., & Holmes, N. G. (2015). Measuring the Impact of an Instructional Laboratory on the Learning of Introductory Physics. American Journal of Physics, 978(August 2009), 972–978. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4931717

Wu, G., & Wu, A. Y. (2020). A New Perspective of How to Understand Entropy in Thermodynamics. Physics Education, 55(1), 015005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ab4de6

Author Biographies

DENS E. S. I. Asbanu, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Author Origin : Indonesia

Parlindungan Sinaga, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Author Origin : Indonesia

Lilik Hasanah, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Author Origin : Indonesia

Nanang Winarno, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Asbanu, D. E. S. I., Sinaga, P., Hasanah, L., & Winarno, N. (2026). Statistical Physics Learning Difficulties and Instructional Strategies: A Systematic Literature Review Supporting Quality Science Education (SDG 4). Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 12(11), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v12i11.15747