Supporting SDG 4 through Teaching Factory Readiness: A CIPP Evaluation with POAC Analysis at Vocational High School
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v12i9.15991Published:
2026-09-30Downloads
Abstract
Teaching Factory (TEFA) connects school-based vocational learning with authentic industrial practices. However, variations in its implementation indicate the need for a comprehensive evaluation of institutional readiness. This study evaluated TEFA implementation readiness at State Vocational High School (SMK) 2 Padang using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) model as the principal quantitative evaluation framework. The Planning, Organizing, Actuating, and Controlling (POAC) framework was applied as a qualitative analytical lens for interpreting managerial practices rather than as a separate quantitative measurement. A convergent mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaires administered to Grade XI students in the TKJ, BDR, and MPLB programmes, while qualitative data were obtained through interviews with three TEFA coordinators, observations, and institutional documents. Overall institutional readiness reached 76.5% and was categorized as Ready. Input achieved the highest score (79%), followed by Product (78%), Context (76%), and Process (73%). Qualitative POAC analysis indicated that planning, organizational arrangements, and programme implementation had been established, whereas controlling remained comparatively weak, particularly in monitoring, documentation, evaluation, and follow-up. Therefore, strengthening managerial control, continuous quality assurance, and industry collaboration is essential for ensuring sustainable TEFA implementation
Keywords:
CIPP evaluation Institutional readiness POAC Teaching Factory Vocational educationReferences
Abele, E., Chryssolouris, G., Sihn, W., Metternich, J., ElMaraghy, H., Seliger, G., Sivard, G., ElMaraghy, W., Hummel, V., Tisch, M., & Seifermann, S. (2017). Learning factories for future-oriented research and education in manufacturing. CIRP Annals, 66(2), 803–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.005
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
Chryssolouris, G., Mavrikios, D., & Rentzos, L. (2016). The Teaching Factory: A manufacturing education paradigm. Procedia CIRP, 57, 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.009
Deliana, & Anwar, M. (2025). Effectiveness of STEM-oriented project-based learning modules in visual communication design to support science and technology skills in vocational education. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(4), 339–345. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i4.10542
Friadi, J., Asro, L., L., A., Yani, D. P., Suroto, B., A., & Alfiyandri. (2024). E-learning evaluation based on Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(Special Issue), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10iSpecialIssue.7383
Mavrikios, D., Georgoulias, K., & Chryssolouris, G. (2018). The Teaching Factory paradigm: Developments and outlook. Procedia Manufacturing, 23, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.029
Mavrikios, D., Georgoulias, K., & Chryssolouris, G. (2019). The Teaching Factory Network: A new collaborative paradigm for manufacturing education. Procedia Manufacturing, 31, 398–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.062
Miles, B. M., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis Edition 3. USA: SAGE Publication, Inc.
Muhab, S., Rini, T. D. S., Erdawati, E., & Irwanto, I. (2024). Evaluation of differentiated learning in chemistry by using the CIPP evaluation model. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(2), 923–939. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i2.5985
Pradipta, B. Q., Hirawan, F. B., & Ragamustari, S. K. (2021). Evaluation of policy in the vocational education system revitalization in Indonesia: Examining the Teaching Factory readiness of industry. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 11(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v11i1.37693
Prianto, A., Winardi, W., & Qomariyah, U. N. (2021). The effect of the implementation of Teaching Factory and its learning involvement toward work readiness of vocational school graduates. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14117a
Rentzos, L., Doukas, M., Mavrikios, D., Mourtzis, D., & Chryssolouris, G. (2014). Integrating manufacturing education with industrial practice using Teaching Factory paradigm: A construction equipment application. Procedia CIRP, 17, 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.126
Rentzos, L., Mavrikios, D., & Chryssolouris, G. (2015). A two-way knowledge interaction in manufacturing education: The Teaching Factory. Procedia CIRP, 32, 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.082
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. London: Guilford Publications.
Suhartini, R. (2022). Teaching Factory Management in Vocational High Schools. Ilomata International Journal of Management, 3(2), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijjm.v3i2.448
Terry, G. R., & Irwin, R. D. (2013). Principles of management. https://www.shorturl.asia/nqenn0
Wahjusaputri, S., & Bunyamin, B. (2022). Development of Teaching Factory Competency-Based for Vocational Secondary Education in Central Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(1), 353–360. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1340976
Wahjusaputri, S., Nastiti, T. I., & Liu, Y. (2024). Development of a hybrid Teaching Factory model based on school governance in improving employability skills of vocational students. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 14(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v14i1.65108
Weiner, B. J. (2009). A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implementation Science, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-67
Widiatna, A. D., Utami, P. P., & Kemal, I. (2025). Implementing and managing the Teaching Factory learning model at vocational schools. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(5), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i5.10944
Wijanarka, B. S., Wijarwanto, F., & Mbakwa, P. N. (2023). Successful implementation of Teaching Factory in machining expertise in vocational high schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 13(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v13i1.51811
Yoto, Y., Marsono, M., Qolik, A., & Romadin, A. (2024). Evaluation of teaching factory using CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) model to improve vocational high school students’ skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 14(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v14i1.62573
Yulita, N., & Prayitno, M. A. (2023). Improving vocational skills and learning outcomes through entrepreneurship-based chemistry learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 9025–9032. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.2918
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Windi Fauzia Gusmita, M. Giatman, Titi Sriwahyuni, Jonni Mardizal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
