Identification of Misconceptions in the Material of the Origin of Life in terms of Student Learning Outcomes
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1651Published:
2022-07-31Downloads
Abstract
Madrasah Aliyah as an Islamic-based school is assumed to be influenced by polemics between clergy and scientists about evolutionary material, especially in the theory of the origin of life. Often teachers try to relate the material about the origin of life to the study of the Qur'an and hadith, but students still experience difficulties and errors in understanding concepts. This raises the curiosity of researchers to find out how big the percentage of misconceptions experienced by students on the origin of life material and what factors influence it. This study uses a qualitative method with purposive sampling technique. Based on the identification results, it was found that in the material origin of life there were still misconceptions in the sub material of Abiogenesis theory with a percentage of 47.00%, Biogenesis theory with a percentage of 41.00%, and Cosmozoa Theory with 35.00%. Some of the factors that influence it come from students, teachers and the teaching materials used
Keywords:
Misconceptions, Theory of the origin of life, Learning outcomesReferences
Agustina, R., Sipahutar, H., & Harahap, F. (2016). Analisis Miskonsepsi Pada Buku Ajar Biologi SMA Kelas XII. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 5(2), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpb.v5i2.4307
Araújo, L. A. L. (2022). The centrality of evolution in biology teaching: towards a pluralistic perspective. Journal of Biological Education, 56(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2020.1757486
Darmalaksana, W. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka dan Studi Lapangan. Pre-Print Digital Library UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, 1–6.
Dikmenli, M. (2010). Misconceptions of cell division held by student teachers in biology: A drawing analysis. Scientific Research and Essays, 5(2), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.5897/SRE.9000654
Duda, H.J., Wahyuni, R.E., Setyawan, A.E. (2020). Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi pada Konsep Bioteknologi Hewan. BIOEDUSCIENCE: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi dan Sains, 04(01): 97-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.29405/j.bes/4197-105480
Fajriana, N., Abdullah, A., & Safrida, S. (2017). Analisis Miskonsepsi Buku Teks Pelajaran Biologi Kelas XI Semester 1 SMAN di Kota Banda Aceh. BIOTIK: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi Teknologi Dan Kependidikan, 4(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.22373/biotik.v4i1.1071
Hammersley, M. (1990). Herbert blumer and qualitative method. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 3(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839900030103
Irani, N. V., Zulyusri, Z., & Darussyamsu, R. (2020). Miskonsepsi Materi Biologi Sma Dan Hubungannya Dengan Pemahaman Siswa. Jurnal Biolokus, 3(2), 348. https://doi.org/10.30821/biolokus.v3i2.823
Irwansyah, Sukarmin, & Harjana. (2018). Analysis Profile of Student Misconceptions on Fluid-Based Instrument Three-Tier Test Concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012020
Jago Duda, H., Esti Wahyuni, F. R., & Edy setyawan, A. (2020). Mengidentifikasi Mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi mahasiswa pendidikan biologi pada konsep Bioteknologi Hewan. BIOEDUSCIENCE: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Dan Sains, 4(1), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.29405/j.bes/4197-1054807
Leadbeater, B. S. C. (2014). The choanoflagellates: Evolution, biology and ecology. In The Choanoflagellates: Evolution, Biology and Ecology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000.2015.1080846
Maison, M., Lestari, N., & Widaningtyas, A. (2020). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi Usaha Dan Energi. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v6i1.314
Maison, Syahrial, Syamsurizal, & Tanti. (2012). Learning Environment, Students’ Beliefs, and Self-Regulation in Learning Physics : Structural Equation Modeling Issn 1648-3898 Issn 2538-7138. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 389–403.
Muna, I. A. (2016). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Pgmi Pada Konsep Hukum Newton Menggunakan Certainty of Response Index (Cri). Cendekia: Journal of Education and Society, 13(2), 309. https://doi.org/10.21154/cendekia.v13i2.251
Nurkamilah, P., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2021). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Bilangan Berpangkat. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v10i1.818
Puspitasari, Y., Reza, S. P. K., Bachtiar, Y., & Prayitno, B. A. (2019). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Materi Jaringan Tumbuhan Pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi Di Salah Satu Universitas Di Surakarta. BIOEDUKASI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi), 10(2), 171. https://doi.org/10.24127/bioedukasi.v10i2.2494
Putri, A. N., & Hindrasti, N. E. K. (2020). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Pada Konsep Evolusi Menggunakan Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Jurnal Kiprah, 8(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.31629/kiprah.v8i1.1604
Qurrota, A., & Nuswowati, M. (2018). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Tes Diagnostic Multiple Choice Berbantuan Cri (Certainty of Response Index). Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 12(1), 2108–2117.
Ritchie, J.E. (2001). Case series research: a case for qualitative method in assembling evidence. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. 17(3).127-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/095939801317077588
Saputra, A. (2017). Persepsi Mahasiswa Calon Guru Biologi tentang Pembelajaran Materi Evolusi di SMA: Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi FKIP Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta Alaninda Saputra Prodi Pendidikan Biologi FKIP Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta. Jurnal Ilmiah Edukasia, 11(1), 1–9. Retrieved from http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/bioeducation/article/view/7085/5578
Satar, S., Hala, Y., & Arifin, A. N. (2016). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Biologi Universitas Negeri Makassar Pada Biologi Sel Menggunakan CRI. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 2014, 317–322.
Sutrisno, A. D. (2019). Survey Pemahaman Konsep dan Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa SMA pada Materi Kinematika Gerak. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika), 4(1), 106. https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v4i1.15796
Suwono, H., Prasetyo, T. I., Lestari, U., Lukiati, B., Fachrunnisa, R., Kusairi, S., Saefi, M., Fauzi, A., & Atho’Illah, M. F. (2021). Cell Biology Diagnostic Test (CBD-Test) portrays pre-service teacher misconceptions about biology cell. Journal of Biological Education, 55(1), 82–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1643765
Wilson, V. (1997). Focus groups: A useful qualitative method for educational research? British Educational Research Journal, 23(2), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192970230207
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Alya Nur Abdila, Khairuna Khairuna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
