Validity and Practicality of Sangiran Site-Based Virtual Laboratory Learning Media on Evolutionary Materials to Empower Science Literacy

Authors

Wahyu Pangestuning Astuti , Murni Ramli , Suranto Suranto

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1672

Published:

2022-07-31

Issue:

Vol. 8 No. 3 (2022): July

Keywords:

Virtual laboratory, Sangiran sites, Evolution, Science literacy

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Astuti, W. P. ., Ramli, M., & Suranto, S. (2022). Validity and Practicality of Sangiran Site-Based Virtual Laboratory Learning Media on Evolutionary Materials to Empower Science Literacy . Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1378–1384. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1672
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

The validity and practicality of the media are a condition before it can be widely piloted. This research aims to find out the validity and practicality of the Evolution Virtual Laboratory Learning Media, which was developed based on the artefacts of the Sangiran Site to empower science literacy of students. The media validity test using expert judgment involved two expert validators, and two high school biology teachers. While the media practicality test involved 20 grade 12th students. The instrument used was a validity questionnaire consisting of 9 items (material experts), 18 items (media experts), and 13 items (practitioners). Questionnaire instruments to students as many as 16 items. All questionnaires use the Likert Scale. The test results showed material experts rated 86.80%, media experts 84.6%, education practitioners 84.30%, and students by 79.00%. Based on the validity and practicality of the Sangiran Site-based Evolution virtual laboratory learning media is declared valid and practical, so it can be used for effectiveness testing.

References

Alneyadi, S. S. (2019). Virtual Lab Implementation in Science Literacy: Emirati Science Teachers’ Perspectives. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(12), em1786. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/109285

Badu, M. R., Uno, H. B., Dako, R. D. R., & Uloli, H. (2021). Development and validation of learning media on combustion engine. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1833(1), 12024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1833/1/012024

Cheng, M. T., Lin, Y. W., & She, H. C. (2015). Learning through playing Virtual Age: Exploring the interactions among student concept learning, gaming performance, in-game behaviors, and the use of in-game characters. Computers and Education, 86, 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.007

ÄŒipková, E., KarolÄík, Å ., & Scholzová, L. (2019). Are secondary school graduates prepared for the studies of natural sciences? – evaluation and analysis of the result of scientific literacy levels achieved by secondary school graduates. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(2), 146–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1599846

Crowell, A., & Schunn, C. (2016). Unpacking the Relationship Between Science Education and Applied Scientific Literacy. Research in Science Education, 46(1), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9462-1

Darussyamsu, R., Fadilah, M., & Putri, D. H. (2019). Biology module based on ESQ effective to improve students’ evolution knowledge for high and medium academic ability level. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012190

Falchetti, E. M. (2012). Biological Evolution on Display: An Approach to Evolutionary Issues Through a Museum. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 5(1), 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-012-0396-z

Fauville, G., Dupont, S., von Thun, S., & Lundin, J. (2015). Can Facebook be used to increase scientific literacy? A case study of the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute Facebook page and ocean literacy. Computers & Education, 82, 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.003

Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK. Re-Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education, 41(7), 28–42. Retrieved from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315735665-4/model-teacher-professional-knowledge-skill-including-pck-gess-newsome-julie

Giguère, A., Zomahoun, H. T. V., Carmichael, P.-H., Uwizeye, C. B., Légaré, F., Grimshaw, J. M., Gagnon, M.-P., Auguste, D. U., & Massougbodji, J. (2020). Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2020(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004398.pub4

Hartini, S., Misbah, M., Dewantara, D., Oktovian, R. A., & Aisyah, N. (2017). Developing learning media using online prezi into materials about optical equipments. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 313–317. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.10102

Heddy, B. C., & Sinatra, G. M. (2013). Transforming misconceptions: Using transformative experience to promote positive affect and conceptual change in students learning about biological evolution. Science Education, 97(5), 723–744. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21072

Henuhili, V. et. a. (2012). Diktat Kuliah Evolusi. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 12, 1–14.

Hermansyah, H., Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., & Adawiyah, R. (2019). Guided inquiry model with virtual labs to improve students’ understanding on heat concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1153(1), 12116. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1153/1/012116

Jati, S. S. P., Subekti, A., & Sulistyo, W. D. (2020). Development of “Video Bank†based on prehistoric community life at the sangiran site as an independent learning media. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(7), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJET.V15I07.13257

Jufrida, J., Basuki, F. R., Kurniawan, W., Pangestu, M. D., & Fitaloka, O. (2019). Scientific Literacy and Science Learning Achievement at Junior High School. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(4), 630–636. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i4.20312

Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2009). Preliminary evolutionary explanations: A basic framework for conceptual change and explanatory coherence in evolution. Science and Education, 18(10), 1313–1340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-008-9171-5

Kinshuk, Chen, N.-S., Cheng, I.-L., & Chew, S. W. (2016). Evolution Is not enough: Revolutionizing Current Learning Environments to Smart Learning Environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 561–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0108-x

Kwon, M., Kim, D.-J., Cho, H., & Yang, S. (2013). The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PloS One, 8(12), e83558. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083558

Lawless, K. A., & Brown, S. W. (2015). Developing scientific literacy skills through interdisciplinary, technology-based global simulations: GlobalEd 2. Curriculum Journal, 26(2), 268–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2015.1009133

Li, Y., & Guo, M. (2021). Scientific Literacy in Communicating Science and Socio-Scientific Issues: Prospects and Challenges. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(November). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.758000

Lieskovský, J., & Sunyík, V. (2022). How to enhance scientific literacy? Review of interventions focused on improving high school students’ scientific reasoning skills and attitudes toward science. Ceskoslovenska Psychologie, 66(1), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.51561/cspsych.66.1.30

Liskasari, R., Soeparmi, S., & Karyanto, P. (2018). Integrating Sangiran Early Man Site Museum to Project-Based Learning in Science Course: The-Earth Materials. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 12(4), 669–675. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v12i4.9142

McFarlane, D. A. (2013). Understanding the challenges of science education in the 21st century: New opportunities for scientific literacy. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 04, 35–44.

Merta, I. W., Artayasa, I. P., Kusmiyati, K., Lestari, N., & Setiadi, D. (2020). Profil Literasi Sains dan Model Pembelajaran dapat Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Sains. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 15(3), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v15i3.1889

Mukhadis, A., Putra, A., Kiong, T. T., Sutadji, E., Puspitasari, P., Sembiring, A. I., & Subandi, M. S. (2021). The innovation of learning plan designer based mobile web to improve quality of learning media in vocational technology for education 4.0. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1833(1), 12030. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1833/1/012030

O’toole, J. M., McKoy, K., Freestone, M., & Osborn, J. A. (2020). ‘Scientific Literacy’: An Exercise in Model Building. Education Sciences, 10(8), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10080204

Olander, C. (2013). Why am I learning evolution? Pointers towards enacted scientific literacy. Journal of Biological Education, 47(3), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.821750

Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching Scientific Practices: Meeting the Challenge of Change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1

Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2008). 21st Century Skills, Education & Competitiveness. A Resource and Policy Guide, 20.

Parviainen, P., Tihinen, M., Kääriäinen, J., & Teppola, S. (2017). Tackling the digitalization challenge: how to benefit from digitalization in practice. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 5(1), 63–77.

PISA. (2019). PISA 2018 Science Framework. 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1787/f30da688-en

Purnomo, F. A., Pratisto, E. H., & Putra, A. R. M. (2018). Evaluation of serious game based on Bukuran Cluster of Museum Sangiran. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1977(June). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5042934

Putra, D. P. (2021). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Fisika Menggunakan Kartun 3D. Jurnal Literasi Digital, 1(2), 88–93.

Riduwan. (2010). Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian.

Rokhmah, A., Sunarno, W., & Masykuri, M. (2017). Science Literacy Indicators In Optical Instruments Of Highschool Physics Textbooks Chapter. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 13(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v13i1.8391

Rosyadah Mukti, W., Dahlia Yuliskurniawati, I., Ika Noviyanti, N., Mahanal, S., & Zubaidah, S. (2019). A survey of high school students’ scientific literacy skills in different gender. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1241(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012043

Schulteis, M. W. (2010). Education’s missing link: How private school teachers approach evolution. American Biology Teacher, 72(2), 91–94. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2010.72.2.7

Shaffer, J. F., Ferguson, J., & Denaro, K. (2019). Use of the test of scientific literacy skills reveals that fundamental literacy is an important contributor to scientific literacy. CBE Life Sciences Education, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-12-0238

Sinatra, G. M., Kienhues, D., & Hofer, B. K. (2014). Addressing Challenges to Public Understanding of Science: Epistemic Cognition, Motivated Reasoning, and Conceptual Change. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.916216

Sulistiyowati, S., Abdurrahman, A., & Jalmo, T. (2018). The Effect of STEM-Based Worksheet on Students’ Science Literacy. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 3(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v3i1.2141

Suwono, H. (2016). School literary movement in Indonesia: Challenges for scientific literacy. International Conference on Education (ICE2) 2018: Education and Innovation in Science in the Digital Era, 309–317.

Tang, Kok-Sing, & Danielson, K. (2018). Global Developments in Literacy Research for Science Education (Kok-Sing; Tang & D. Kristina (eds.)). Springer International Publishing AG 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69197-8

Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253

Van Dijk, E. M. (2014). Understanding the Heterogeneous Nature of Science: A Comprehensive Notion of PCK for Scientific Literacy. Science Education, 98(3), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21110

Author Biographies

Wahyu Pangestuning Astuti, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta

Murni Ramli, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta

Suranto Suranto, Universitas Sebelas Maret

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Wahyu Pangestuning Astuti, Murni Ramli, Suranto Suranto

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).