Argumentation Practices to Increase Knowledge and Competence of Acid-Base Materials for Prospective Chemistry Teacher Students

Authors

Munnal Hani'ah , Nurfina Aznam

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1754

Published:

2022-10-31

Issue:

Vol. 8 No. 4 (2022): October

Keywords:

Argumentation, Knowledge, Competence, Acid Base

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Hani'ah, M., & Aznam, N. (2022). Argumentation Practices to Increase Knowledge and Competence of Acid-Base Materials for Prospective Chemistry Teacher Students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 1894–1899. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1754
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This study aims to determine the practice of argumentation to increase the knowledge and competence of acid-base material for prospective chemistry teacher students. This study uses a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental method. The design of this research is the pretest posttest group. The sample in this study were 54 students of chemistry education at UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta who were taking basic chemistry courses. Meanwhile, the knowledge instrument is in the form of a multiple-choice test, while the competency instrument is a test in the form of a description. The data analysis technique in this study was carried out statistically inferential (analysis of independent sample t-test). The results of the study show thaththere is a significant difference between the pretest and posttest values ​​in the knowledge domain with t value is -5.508 and probability value paired t test is 0.00 (p value < 0.05). In addition, the mean is -4.167 (negative value) indicates that there is a tendency to increase knowledge significantly. There is also a significant difference between the pretest and posttest values ​​of the competency domain with t value is -8.686 and probability value paired t test is 0.00 (p value < 0.05). In addition, the mean is -3,796 (negative value) indicates that there is a tendency to significantly increase the value of the competency dimension.

References

Ahmad, F., & Ur Rahman, F. (2018). Investigating the transfer of argumentation skills through engagement in an online learning platform. Pakistan Journal of Distance & Online Learning, I, 81–94.

Bekiari, A., & Balla, K. (2017). Instructors and students relations: argumentativeness, leadership, and goal orientations. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 05(07), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2017.57009

ÇEVİK, M., ŞANLITÜRK, A. D., & YAĞCI, A. (2017). Ortaokul oğretmenlerinin FeTeMM (Fen-Teknoloji-Mühendislik-Matematik) farkındalıklarının farklı değişkenlere göre değerlendirilmesi. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 7, 584–599. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.335008

Cigdemoglu, C., Arslan, H. O., & Cam, A. (2017). Argumentation to foster pre-service science teachers’ knowledge, competency, and attitude on the domains of chemical literacy of acids and bases. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(2), 288–303. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6rp00167j

Devi, N. D. C., Susanti VH, E., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2018). Analysis of high school students’ argumentation ability in the topic of buffer solution. JKPK (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan Kimia), 3(3), 141. https://doi.org/10.20961/jkpk.v3i3.23308

Fahmina, S. S., Indriyanti, N. Y., Setyowati, W. A. E., Masykuri, M., & Yamtinah, S. (2019). Dimension of chemical literacy and its influence in chemistry learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012026

Farawansyah, K. I., & Suyono, S. (2021). Pengembangan lembar penugasan terstruktur pada materi laju reaksi untuk melatihkan keterampilan argumentasi. Chemistry Education Practice, 4(2), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.29303/cep.v4i2.2315

Ginanjar, W. S., Utari, S., & Muslim, D. (2015). Penerapan model argument-driven inquiry dalam pembelajaran IPA untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa SMP. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 20(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i1.559

Hastjarjo, T. D. (2019). Rancangan eksperimen-kuasi. Buletin Psikologi, 27(2), 187. https://doi.org/10.22146/buletinpsikologi.38619

Heng, L. L., Surif, J., & Seng, C. H. (2014). Individual versus group argumentation: student’s performance in a Malaysian context. International Education Studies, 7(7), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n7p109

Heng, L. L., Surif, J., Seng, C. H., & Ibrahim, N. H. (2015). Mastery of scientific argumentation on the concept of neutralization in chemistry: a Malaysian perspective. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2015.12.5

Manz, E. (2015). Representing student argumentation as functionally emergent from scientific activity. Review of Educational Research (Vol. 85, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314558490

Muntholib, Ibnu, S., Rahayu, S., Fajaroh, F., Kusairi, S., & Kuswandi, B. (2020). Chemical literacy: performance of first year chemistry students on chemical kinetics. Indonesian Journal of Chemistry, 20(2), 468–482. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.43651

OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: science, reading, mathematic, financial literacy and collaborative problem solving, revised edition. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2015-assessment-and-analytical-..264255425-en

Pudjantoro, P. (2015). Sikap kritis dan keterampilan berargumentasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 28(2), 137–144.

Rahman, A. (2020). Argumentative skill: sebuah hasil dari proses pembelajaran melalui model inquiry pada siswa madrasah aliyah. Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi Undiksha, 8(3), 110–118. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view. _ZNEOYC

Rahman, D. F. (2018). Analisis argumentasi dalam isu sosiosaintifik siswa SMP. Thabiea: Journal of Natural Science Teaching, 01(01), 9–13.

Rohmatulloh, & Winarni, S. (2015). Evaluasi hasil pembelajaran diklat menggunakan disain pretest posttest nonequivalent control group. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Statsisitka III, October, 1–11.

Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. P. (2011). Argument-driven inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: an exploratory study. Science Education, 95(2), 217–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20421

Sari, D. N. A., Rusilowati, A., & Nuswowati, M. (2017). Pengaruh pembelajaran berbasis proyek terhadap kemampuan literasi sains siswa. PSEJ (Pancasakti Science Education Journal), 2(2), 114. https://doi.org/10.24905/psej.v2i2.741

Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006). The use of scientific literacy taxonomy for assessing the development of chemical literacy among high-school students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(4), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1039/B6RP90011A

Siswanto, Kaniawati, I., & Suhandi, A. (2014). Penerapan model pembelajaran pembangkit argumen menggunakan metode saintifik untuk meningkatkan kemampuan kognitif dan keterampilan berargumentasi siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 10(2), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v10i2.3347

Suartha, I. N., Setiawan, I. G. A. N., & Sudiatmika, A. A. (2020). Pola argumen Toulmin pada proses pembelajaran IPA SMP. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(April), 1–11.

Sumarni, W., Sudarmin, Wiyanto, Rusilowati, A., & Susilaningsih, E. (2017). Chemical literacy of teaching candidates studying the integrated food chemistry ethnosciences course. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(3), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10204a

Thummathong, R., & Thathong, K. (2016). Construction of a chemical literacy test for engineering students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(3), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10179a

Thummathong, R., & Thathong, K. (2018). Chemical literacy levels of engineering students in Northeastern Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(3), 478–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.06.009

Wardani, A. D., Yuliati, L., & Taufiq, A. (2018). Kualitas argumentasi ilmiah siswa pada materi hukum Newton. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 3(10), 1364–1372. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/

Wiyarsi, A., Pratomo, H., & Priyambodo, E. (2020). Vocational high school students’ chemical literacy on context-based learning: a case of petroleum topic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(1), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.18

Wolfson, A. J., Rowland, S. L., Lawrie, G. A., & Wright, A. H. (2014). Chemistry education research and practice. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(2), 168–183.

Woodard, J., Miller, H., DeVore-Wedding, B. R., & Griep, M. A. (2019). The pathway to chemical literacy: a resource guide of chemistry courses at Tribal Colleges and Universities. Tribal College and University Research Journal, Volume 4.

Yustin, D. L., & Wiyarsi, A. (2019). Students’ chemical literacy: a study in chemical bonding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1397(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1397/1/012036

Author Biographies

Munnal Hani'ah, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Nurfina Aznam, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Munnal Hani'ah, Nurfina Aznam

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).