Analysis of Understanding Physics Concepts in terms of Students' Learning Styles and Thinking Styles

Authors

Nia Kurnia Devy , A. Halim , Muhammad Syukri , Yusrizal Yusrizal , Syahrun Nur , Ibnu Khaldun , Saminan Saminan

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1926

Published:

2022-10-31

Issue:

Vol. 8 No. 4 (2022): October

Keywords:

Level of Understanding, Physics Concepts, Learning styles, Thinking styles

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Devy, N. K., Halim, A., Syukri, M. ., Yusrizal, Y., Nur, S. ., Khaldun, I. ., & Saminan, S. (2022). Analysis of Understanding Physics Concepts in terms of Students’ Learning Styles and Thinking Styles. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 1937–1943. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1926

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

There are three types of student learning styles used in the study, namely visual, auditory and kinesthetic and four types of thinking styles used in this study, namely Concrete Sequential, Abstract Sequential, Concrete Random, and Abstract Random. This study aims to analyze the level of understanding of physics concepts in terms of students' learning styles and thinking styles and examines learning styles and thinking styles that most influence the level of conceptual understanding. This study uses a quantitative approach, survey methods, and descriptive techniques. The population in this study were all students of SMAN 9 Banda Aceh, while the sample was 116 grade 2 students of SMA Negeri 9 Banda Aceh. Data analysis used descriptive statistical tests and data triangulation. The results of the analysis show that the level of understanding of students is at the second level, namely not understanding dominance compared to other levels of understanding concepts. Furthermore, it is obtained that a high kinesthetic learning style affects the level of understanding of concepts with a visual learning style. As for the thinking style, it was found that the concrete sequential thinking style was more dominant in influencing the level of conceptual understanding compared to other thinking styles

References

Abante, M.E., Almendral, B.C., Manansala, J.E., & Manibo, J. (2014). Learning Style and Factors Affecting the Learning of General Engineering Student. Internasional Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. 3(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v3-i1/500

Abraham, M.R., Grzybowski, E.B., Renner, J.W. and Marek, A.E. (1992). Understanding and misunderstanding of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29 (2), 105-120. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290203

Ahmad, D.N. (2018). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Peserta Didik Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Sistem Peredaran Darah Pada Manusia di Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri 11 Depok. Pembelajar: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Keguruan, dan Pembelajaran. 2 (1) April 2018. https://doi.org/10.26858/pembelajar.v2i1.5010

Bancong, H. (2014). Studi Kualitatif Gaya Berpikir Peserta Didik dalam Memecahkan Masalah Fisika. Jurnal Berkala Fisika Indonesia 6 (1). 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.12928/bfi-jifpa.v6i1.354

Chislett, V., & Chapman, A. (2005). VAK learning style self-assessment questionnaire. Retrieved from https://www.businessballs.com/self-awareness/vak-learning-styles/

DePorter, B & Hernacki, M. (2013). Quantum Learning. Jakarta: Kaifa.

Halim, Suriana dan Mursal. (2017). Dampak Problem Based Learning terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Ditinjau dari Gaya Berpikir Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika. JPPPF - Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika. 3(1). 1-10. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.03101

Jatikusumo, G.A., Mayasari, T., & Kurniadi, E. (2017). Analisis Gaya Belajar Sswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri 5 Kota Madiun. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika III Juli 2017:213-217. Retrieved from http://e-journal.unipma.ac.id/index.php/snpf/article/view/1687

Kemendikbud. (2019). Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia tentang Laporan Hasil Ujian Nasional. Jakarta: BSNP.

Latisma, D.J., Firti, R.L., & Dewata, I. (2015). Analisis Kecenderungan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar pada Materi Sistem Koloid di SMA Kerinci. Prosiding SEMIRATA 2015 bidang MIPA BKS-PTN Barat Hal. 523 – 532. Retrived from https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/semirata2015/article/view/14266

Muliana, E., Saminan, S., & Wahyuni, A. (2017). Gaya Berpikir Siswa dalam Menganalisis Konsep Fisika Melalui Grafik Kinematika. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa (JIM) Pendidikan Fisika. 2(2). Retrieved from https://jim.unsyiah.ac.id/pendidikan-fisika/article/view/3059

Pekic, Z., Javanovski, S., & Pekic, N. (2016). The Impact of Felder’s Learning Styles Index on Motivation and Adoption of Information Through E-Learning. Journal of Information Technology and Applications. 6(2). 93-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.7251/JIT1602093P

Psycharis & Chatzarakis. (2014). Examining The Effect of Learning Styles, Epistemic Beliefs and The Computational Experiment Methodology on Learners’ Performance Using The Easy Java Simulator Tool in STEM Disciplines. J.Educational Computing Research, 51(1) 91-118. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.51.1.e

Purwowidodo, A. (2016). Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran dan Gaya Berpikir Terhadap Pemahaman dan Penerapan Konsep IPS Siswa Kelas VII SMPN. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 22(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jip.v22i2.8726

Rhouma, W.B. (2016). Perceptual Learning Styles Preferences And Academic Achievement. International Journal of Arts & Sciences. 9(2). 479–492.

Saglam & Devecioglu. (2010). Student teachers’ levels of understanding and model of understanding about Newton's laws of motion. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching. 11(1). https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/v11_issue1/arslan/index.htm

Silberman, M. (2013). Pembelajaran Aktif 101 Strategi untuk Mengajar Secara Aktif. Jakarta Barat: PT Indeks.

Sudijono, A. (2005). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Paja Grafindo. Persada.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta

Suraji, S., Maimunah, M., & Saragih, S. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel (SPLDV). Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1) 9-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/sjme.v4i1.5057

Sutriningsih, N. (2015). Model Pembelajaran Team Assisted Individualization Berbasis Assessment for Learning pada Persamaan Garis Lurus ditinjau dari Karakteristik Cara Berpikir. Jurnal e-DuMath. 1(1). https://doi.org/10.52657/je.v1i1.81

Utami, A.D., Suriyah, P., & Mayasari, N. (2020). Level Pemahaman Konsep Komposisi Fungsi Berdasar Taksonomi SOLO (Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes). Jawa Tengah: CV. Pena Persada.

Winulang, A., & Subkhan, S. (1). Pengaruh Disiplin Belajar, Gaya Belajar Dan Lingkungan Keluarga Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Akuntansi Siswa Kelas Xi Ips Sma Solihin Kabupaten Magelang Tahun Ajaran 2013/2014. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 4(1). Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eeaj/article/view/4697

Yuniarti, Y., Supriyono, S., Nugraheni, P., & Wasiman, W. (2020). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Bentuk Aljabar Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika JIPM, 2(2). 92-105. https://doi.org/10.37729/jipm.v2i2.1007

Author Biographies

Nia Kurnia Devy, Universitas Syiah Kuala

A. Halim, Syiah Kuala University

Muhammad Syukri, Syiah Kuala University

Yusrizal Yusrizal, Syah Kuala University

Syahrun Nur, Syah Kuala University

Ibnu Khaldun, Syah Kuala University

Saminan Saminan, Syah Kuala University

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Nia Kurnia Devy, A. Halim, Muhammad Syukri, Yusrizal Yusrizal, Syahrun Nur, Ibnu Khaldun, Saminan Saminan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).