The Influence of POGIL and MFI Models on Science Literacy and Science Process Skills for Junior High School

Authors

Sirry Alvina , Mellyzar Mellyzar , Syarifah Rita Zahara , Masrina Masrina , Sella Afrianti

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.2121

Published:

2022-10-31

Issue:

Vol. 8 No. 4 (2022): October

Keywords:

POGIL, MFI, Scientific Literacy, Science Process Skills

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Alvina, S. ., Mellyzar, M., Zahara, S. R. ., Masrina, M., & Afrianti, S. . (2022). The Influence of POGIL and MFI Models on Science Literacy and Science Process Skills for Junior High School . Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 1907–1915. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.2121
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This study aims to determine how the influence of the POGIL model on the ability of the science process and scientific literacy of students, in addition to knowing how the MFI model affects science process skills and scientific literacy of students and the comparison of POGIL and MFI models on science process skills and scientific literacy of Lhokseumawe City Junior High School students. This research uses an approach to quantitative research. The population of this research is the seventh-grade students of SMP in Lhokseumawe city. The research sample taken is SMPN students Arun, SMPN 1 Lhokseumawe, and SMPN 2 Lhokseumawe every 3 schools that consist of 2 experimental classes (POGIL and MFI models) and 1 control class (conventional) with a total of 9 classes. The research instrument used is a test question for knowing students' literacy skills, practicum guide sheets, and observation sheets to determine students' science process skills. In the class with the POGIL model, the average value of scientific literacy ability is 32.27, and science process skills are 81.32. In class with the MFI model, the average value of science literacy skills is 26.84, and process skills science 88.71. While the control class has an average value of scientific literacy ability of 12.77 and science process skills of 68.54. Based on Test Test output Statistics data of students' scientific literacy and science process skills are known as the value of asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) of 0.00 < 0.05, it can be concluded that the POGIL model has a significant effect on students' scientific literacy and science process skills.  The results for the MFI class scores of students' scientific literacy skills and science process skills, because of the Asymp value. Sig. (0.000) < (0.05) so that learning with the MFI model affects the scientific literacy ability and science process skills of students. Classes taught with POGIL and MFI models with Asymp grades. Sig. (0.099 > (0.05) means that there is no significant difference in students' scientific literacy skills between students who are taught with the POGIL model and students who are taught with the MFI model but there is a significant difference in science process skills of students with POGIL and MFI models, where the MFI model students' science process skills higher than the POGIL model

References

Alamanda, V. D. (2015). Implementation of Strategies POGIL to Improve Student’s Self Effication Chemical Bonding Material in Class X. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 4(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/0.26740/ujced.v4n1.p%25p

Alatas, F., & Fachrunisa, Z. (2018). An effective of pogil with virtual laboratory in improving science process skills and attitudes: Simple harmonic motion concept. Edusains, 10(2), 327–334.

Aqib, Z., & Murtadlo, A. (2016). Kumpulan metode pembelajaran kreatif dan inovatif. Bandung: Satu Nusa.

Atmojo, S. E. (2012). Profil keterampilan proses sains dan apresiasi siswa terhadap profesi pengrajin tempe dalam pembelajaran ipa berpendekatan etnosains. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 1(2), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v1i2.2128

Budiasa, K., & Nyeneng, I. D. P. (2013). Perbandingan metode inkuiri terbimbing dan bebas termodifikasi terhadap motivasi dan hasil belajar. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 1(2), 1–13.

Cahayningrum, R. D., Nurjayadi, M., & Rahman, A. (2017). Pengembangan E-Module Kimia Berbasis Pogil (Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning) Pada Materi Reaksi Reduksi-Oksidasi Sebagai Sumber Belajar Siswa. JRPK: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia, 7(1), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpk.071.07

Devitri, N., & Djamas, D. (2019). Validity of physics module nuanced model of process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) to improve scientific literacy at 10th grade senior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185,(1), 0120. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012060

Elfeky, Abdellah Ibrahim Mohammed Masadeh, T. S. Y., & Elbyaly, M. Y. H. (2020). Advance organizers in flipped classroom via e-learning management system and the promotion of integrated science process skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100622

Fasasi, R. A. (2017). Effects of ethnoscience instruction, school location, and parental educational status on learners’ attitude towards science. International Journal of Science Education, 39(5), 548–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1296599

Fuadi, H., Robbia, A. Z., Jamaluddin, J., & Jufri, A. W. (2020). Analisis faktor penyebab rendahnya kemampuan literasi sains peserta didik. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 5(2), 108-116. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v5i2.122

Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Hermansyah, H., & Herayanti, L. (2019). Guided Inquiry Model Through Virtual Laboratory to Enhance Students’ Science Process Skills on Heat Concept. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(2), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i2.23345

Handayani, G., Adisyahputra, A., & Indrayanti, R. (2018). Correlation between integrated science process skills, and ability to read comprehension to scientific literacy in biology teachers students. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.11-1.3

Haryadi, R., & Pujiastuti, H. (2020). PhET simulation software-based learning to improve science process skills. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(2), 022017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/2/022017

Heleri, H., Situmorang, R. P., & Dewi, L. (2019). The Development of Free Inquiry Lab-Based Students’ Worksheet to Increase the Dimension in Science Literacy Process. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 8(2), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v8i2.17573

Idul, J. J. A., & B. Caro, V. (2022). Does process-oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) improve students’ science academic performance and process skills?. International Journal of Science Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2108553

Inayah, A. D., Ristanto, R. H., Sigit, D. V., & Miarsyah, M. (2020). Analysis of science process skills in senior high school students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081803

Mardianti, F., Yulkifli, Y., & Asrizal, A. (2020). Metaanalisis Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Literasi Saintifik. SAINTEK: Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi, 12(2), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.31958/js.v12i2

Marta, M. H. C., Suganda, O., & Widiantie, R. (2018). Upaya Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains melalui Metode Praktikum Berbasis Modified Free Inquiry (MFI) pada Konsep Animalia Di Kelas X MIPA. Quagga: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Biologi, 10(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.25134/quagga.v10i01.802

Mellyzar, M., Lukman, I. R., & Busyraturrahmi, B. (2022). Pengaruh Strategi Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) Terhadap Kemampuan Proses Sains dan Literasi Kimia. Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry, 4(2), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.34312/jjec.v4i2.15338

Nana, S. S. (2010). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nikmah, F., & Ellianawati, E. (2019). Integration of Peer Instruction in the Guided Inquiry Learning Model: Practicing Science Literacy through Scratch. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 5(2), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.05213

Nofiana, M., & Julianto, T. (2018). Upaya peningkatan literasi sains siswa melalui pembelajaran berbasis keunggulan lokal. Biosfer: Jurnal Tadris Biologi, 9(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.24042/biosf.v9i1.2876

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic and Financial Literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assesment and Analytical Framework.

Ongowo, R. O., & Indoshi, F. C. (2013). Science process skills in the Kenya certificate of secondary education biology practical examinations. Creative Education, 11(4), 713–717. http://repository.rongovarsity.ac.ke/handle/123456789/2278

Philbeck, T., & Davis, N. (2018). The fourth industrial revolution. Journal of International Affairs, 72(1), 17-22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26588339

Prasasti, P. A. T., & Listiani, I. (2018). SETS-based guided experiment book: Empowering science process skills of elementary school students. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 4(3), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i3.6684

Rahayu, S. (2017). Mengoptimalkan aspek literasi dalam pembelajaran kimia abad 21. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia UNY, 183–188.

Ramayanti, S., Utari, S., & Saepuzaman, D. (2017). Training students’ science process skills through didactic design on work and energy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, . IOP Publishing, 895(1), 012110. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/2/022017

Safaruddin, S., Ibrahim, N., Juhaeni, J., Harmilawati, H., & Qadrianti, L. (2020). The effect of project-based learning assisted by electronic media on learning motivation and science process skills. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 1(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v1i1.5

Sugiyono. (2014). Methods of quantitative, qualitative and R & D research. Alfabeta.

Suryaningsih, Y. (2017). Pembelajaran berbasis praktikum sebagai sarana siswa untuk berlatih menerapkan keterampilan proses sains dalam materi biologi. Bio Educatio, 2(2), 49–57.

Sutrisna, N. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik SMA Di Kota Sungai Penuh. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 1(12), 2683–2694. https://doi.org/10.47492/jip.v1i12.530

Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253

Volz, M. (2019). Effect of Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning (POGIL) on Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Understanding of Biological Classification. Minnesota State University, Mankato.

Widyaningsih, S. Y., Haryono, H., & Sulistyo, S. (2012). Model MFI dan POGIL Ditinjau dari Aktivitas Siswa Terhadap Prestasi belajar. Inkuiri, 1(3), 266–275.

Yulkifli, Y., Ningrum, M. V., & Indrasari, W. (2019). The validity of student worksheet using inquirworksheetsearning model with science process skill approach for physics learning of the high school. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 5(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.05210

Zamista, A. A., & Kaniawati, I. (2015). Pengaruh model pembelajaran process oriented guided inquiry learning terhadap keterampilan proses sains dan kemampuan kognitif siswa pada mata pelajaran fisika. Edusains, 7(2), 191–201. ttp://dx.doi.org/10.15408/es.v7i2.1815

Author Biographies

Sirry Alvina, Universitas Malikussaleh

Mellyzar Mellyzar, Universitas Malikussaleh

Syarifah Rita Zahara, Universitas Malikussaleh

Masrina Masrina, Universitas Malikussaleh

Sella Afrianti, Universitas Malikussaleh

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Mellyzar Mellyzar, Sirry Alvina, Syarifah Rita Zahara

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).