Evaluation of Metacognitive Skill Level Among Pre-service Biology Teacher on Microbiology Learning
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.2160Published:
2022-12-28Downloads
Abstract
The 21st century skills that must be possessed by pre-service biology teachers is metacognitive skills. Metacognition refers to a person's abilities about his cognition and everything related. This descriptive study aims to describe the level of metacognitive skills of pre-service biology teachers. The data collection procedure was carried out by a metacognitive skill rubric that integrated with essay test. The subjects of this study were 70 of pre-service biology teacher at Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram in the 2021/2022 academic year. The research data were analyzed descriptively by determining the percentage of metacognitive skill levels. The results showed that the mean level of pre-service biology teachers’ metacognitive skills was “starting to develop†(44.35). The pre-service teachers with “have so developed category†occupies the highest percentage (41%), while the lowest percentage is occupied by the category of “still very risky†and “very well developed†with a percentage 6% of each
Keywords:
Metacognitive Skill Pre-service Biology Teacher Biology LearningReferences
Aloysius, D. C. (2016). The analysis of the teaching habit effect based on conventional learning in empowering metacognitive skills and critical. International Journal of Academic Research and Development, 1(5), 64–69.
Bahri, A., & Idris, I. (2017). Teaching Thinking: Memberdayakan Keterampilan Metakognitif Mahasiswa melalui PBLRQA (Integrasi Problem-based Learning dan Reading, Questioning, & Answering). Seminar Nasional LP2M UNM.
Blajvaz, B. K., Bogdanović, I. Z., Jovanović, T. S., Stanisavljević, J. D., & Pavkov-Hrvojević, M. v. (2022). The Jigsaw Technique in Lower Secondary Physics Education: Students’ Achievement, Metacognition and Motivation. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(4), 545–557. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.545
Cencelj, Z., Aberšek, B., Flogie, A., & Kordigel Aberšek, M. (2020). Metacognitive Model for Developing Science, Technology and Engineering Functional Literacy. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(2), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.220
Corebima, A. D. (2009). Metacognitive Skill Measurement Integrated in Achievement Test. In SM310509ADC.
Dewi, N. R., Kannapiran, S., & Wibowo, S. W. A. (2018). Development of Digital Storytelling-Based Science Teaching Materials to Improve Students’ Metacognitive Ability. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i1.12718
Dewi, N. R., Wibowo, W. A., & Savitri, E. N. (2017). The Analysis of Science Learning Sources Reviewed from The Metacognitive Ability of The VII Grade The Students of SMP Negeri 2 Boja. Unnes Science Education Journal, 6(2), 1635–1647. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/usej
Fauzi, A., & Sa’diyah, W. (2019). Students’ metacognitive skills from the viewpoint of answering biological questions: Is it already good? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(3), 317–327. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i3.19457
Frenkel, S. (2014). Metacognitive Components in Learning to Learn Approaches. International Journal of Psychology: A Biopsychosocial Approach, 14, 95–112. https://doi.org/10.7220/2345-024X.14.5
Greenstein, L. (2012). Assessing 21st Century Skills. SAGE Publications.
Ijirana, I., & Supriadi, S. (2018). Metacognitive Skill Profiles of Chemistry Education Students in Solving Problem at Low Ability Level. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(2), 239–245. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i2.14266
Krathwohl, D. R. (2017). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview., 41(4), 212–218. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104
Kristiani, N., Susilo, H., Rohman, F., & Aloysius, D. C. (2015). The contribution of students’ metacognitive skills and scientific attitude towards their academic achievements in biology learning implementing Thinking Empowerment by Questioning (TEQ) learning integrated with inquiry learning (TEQI). International Journal of Educational Policy Research and Review, 2(9), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.15739/IJEPRR.020
Lestari, P. B., & Mistianah, M. (2020). Media Flipbooks Terintegrasi Edmodo Mikrobiologi Sebagai Upaya Pemberdayaan Kemampuan Metakognisi Mahasiswa di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 6(3), 373. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v6i3.2922
Listiana, L., Susilo, H., Suwono, H., & Suarsini, E. (2016). Empowering students’ metacognitive skils through new teaching strategy (group investigation integrated with think talk write) in biology classroom. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(3), 391–400.
Madang, K., Tibrani, M. M., & Santoso, L. M. (2021). Analysis of pre-service biology teachers’ metacognitive skills on invertebrate zoology. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1731(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1731/1/012006
Mahasneh, A. M., & Alwan, A. F. (2018). The Effect of Project-Based Learning on Student Teacher Self-efficacy and Achievement. 11(3), 511–524.
Mamu, H. D. (2014). Profil Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Metakognisi Siswa dalam Pembelajaran IPA Biologi di SMP. SMP. Mamu, H. D, 17(3), 38–48.
Musa, F., Mufti, N., Latiff, R. A., & Amin, M. M. (2012). Project-based learning (PjBL ): inculcating soft skills in 21 century workplace. 59(2006), 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.315
Nunaki, J. H., Damopolii, I., Kandowangko, N. Y., & Nusantari, E. (2019). The Effectiveness of Inquiry-Based Learning to Train the Students’ Metacognitive Skills Based on Gender Differences. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 505–516. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12232a
Nurman, R., Hala, Y., & Bahri, A. (2018). Profil Keterampilan Metakognitif dan Sikap Ilmiah Mahasiswa Jurusan Biologi FPMIPA UNM. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 371–376.
Palennari, M. (2016). Exploring The Correlation Between Metacognition and Cognitive Retention of Students Using Some Biology Teaching Strategies. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(5), 617–629. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.617
Palennari, M., Taiyeb, M., & Saenab, S. (2018). Profile of Students’ Metacognitive Skill Based on Their Learning Style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012030
Putri, A., Lengkana*, D., & Jalmo, T. (2022). Teacher’s Perceptions of Electronic Multi Representation STEM based Worksheet to Improve Student’s Metacognitive Ability. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 10(3), 606–622. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v10i3.25052
Ramdiah, S., & Corebima, A. D. (2014). Learning Strategy Equalizing Students’ Achievement, Metacognitive, and Critical Thinking Skills. 2(8), 577–584. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-2-8-3
Robillos, R. J., & Bustos, I. G. (2022). Learners’ Listening Skill and Metacognitive Awareness through Metacognitive Strategy Instruction with Pedagogical Cycle. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 393–412. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15322a
Saputri, W., & Corebima, A. D. (2020). The Correlation between Metacognitive Skills and Cognitive Learning Results of Biology Pre-service Teachers on Different Learnings. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.40
Shetty, G. (2014). A Study of the Metacognition Levels of Student Teachers on The Basis of Their Learning Styles. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSRJRME), 4(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-04154351
Sugiharto, B., Corebima, A. D., Susilo, H., & Ibrohim. (2019). The pre-service biology teacher readiness in Blended Collaborative Problem Based Learning (BCPBL). International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.1248a
Tortora, G. J., Funke, B. R., & Case, C. L. (2018). Microbiology: an introduction.
Wilson, L. O. (2016). Anderson and Krathwohl Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised Understanding the New Version of Bloom’s Taxonomy. The Second Principle, 1–8. https://quincycollege.edu/content/uploads/Anderson-and-Krathwohl_Revised-Blooms-Taxonomy.pdf%0Ahttps://thesecondprinciple.com/teaching-essentials/beyond-bloom-cognitive-taxonomy-revised/%0Ahttp://thesecondprinciple.com/teaching-essentials/beyond-bloom-cog
Yusnaeni, Y., Corebima, A. D., Susilo, H., & Zubaidah, S. (2017). Creative Thinking of Low Academic Student Undergoing Search Solve Create and Share Learning Integrated with Metacognitive Strategy. International Journal of Instruction, 245–262. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.10216a
Zubaidah, S., Corebima, A. D., Mahanal, S., & Mistianah. (2018). Revealing the relationship between reading interest and critical thinking skills through remap GI and remap jigsaw. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1124a
Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Yulianti, L. (2013). Ragam Model Pembelajaran IPA SMP. Penerbit Universitas Negeri Malang.
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Nining Purwati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
