Student perceptions of the hybrid learning practicum Qualitative Analysis Protein based Constructivism Needham's 5-phase
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.2170Published:
2022-12-28Issue:
Vol. 8 No. 6 (2022): DecemberKeywords:
Student perception, Qualitative analysis of protein, Constructivism needham’s 5-phasesResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This study aims to determine student perceptions of hybrid learning practicum on the topic of qualitative analysis protein-based constructivism Needham's 5-phase. This study uses a quantitative descriptive method. Perception assessment is carried out by referring to 3 dimensions of perception consisting of 4 perception indicators, namely Perception of lecturers, perception of the teaching and learning process, perception of the social environment, and perception of assessment. Data was collected using online questionnaires via google form to students taking biochemistry practicum courses using purposive sampling technique. The results showed that the perception of lecturers obtained a perception level of 74%, the perception of the teaching and learning process was 79%, the perception of the social environment was 81%, and the perception of the assessment was 78%. The percentage of the average perception level was 78%, indicating the feasibility or success of the hybrid learning practicum of qualitative analysis protein based on Needham's five-phase constructivism. Overall, it can be concluded that students' perceptions of the hybrid learning practicum on the topic of qualitative analysis protein based on constructivism Needham's five-phase got the level of perception in the good category
References
Aristika, Darhim, Juandi, & Kusnandi.(2021). The Effectiveness of Hybrid Learning in Improving of Teacher-Student Relationship in Terms of Learning Motivation. Emerging Science Journal, 5(4), 443-456. Doi: 10.28991/esj-2021-01288
Dakir, D., & Fauzi, A. (2022). Hybrid learning effectiveness in Learning Management during the Covid-19 pandemic. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science, 17(11), 3924-3936. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i11.7700
Fauzan, F. A. (2017). Hybrid Learning sebagai Alternatif Model Pembelajaran. Seminar Nasional “Profesionalisme Guru di Era Digitalâ€
Gleason, B., & Greenhow, C. (2017). Hybrid learning in higher education: The potential of teaching and learning with robot-mediated communication. Online Learning, 21(4), 159-176. DOI: 10.24059/olj.v21i4.1276
Indarto, P., Faton, M., & Nurhidayat. (2018). Model Pembelajaran Hybrid Learning pada Mata Kuliah Sepakbola di Pendidikan Olahraga FKIP UMS. Journal of sport science and education (JOSSAE), 3(2), 69-75. https://doi.org/10.26740/jossae.v3n2.p69-75
Surif, J., Tamilselvam, S., Ibrahim, N. H., Abdullah, A. H., and Ali, M.. (2018) "Addressing chemical reaction misconceptions using five phase Needham Model," 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2018, pp. 825-834, DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363316
Jasin, Z., M. & Shaari, A. S. (2012). Keberkesanan model konstruktivisme lima fasa Needham dalam pengajaran komsas Bahasa Melayu. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 2(1), 79-92. Retrieved from http://www.ukm.my/jpbm/Current.aspx
Juwita & Purwoko. (2022). Design and Implementation of Hybrid Learning. International Journal of Educational Dynamics, 4(2), 14-23. DOI: 10.24036/ijeds.v4i2.340
Li, Q., Li, Z., & Han, J. (2021). A hybrid learning pedagogy for surmounting the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic in the performing arts education. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7635-7655. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-021-10612-1
Nugraha, U. (2015). Hubungan Persepsi, Sikap Dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Olahraga Dan Kesehatan Universitas Jambi. Cerdas Sifa Pendidikan. 4(1): 32. https://doi.org/10.22437/csp.v4i1.2640
Purwanto, N. (2013). Prinsip-prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.
Purwanto, A., Pramono, R., Asbari, M., Santoso, P. B., Wijayanti, L. M., Hyun, C. C., & Putri, R. S. (2020). Studi Eksploratif Dampak Pandemi COVID-19 Terhadap Proses Pembelajaran Online di Sekolah Dasar. Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 2(1), 1–12. Retrieved from https://ummaspul.e-journal.id/Edupsycouns/article/view/397
Rahayu, S. (2017). Pengaruh Lingkungan Teman Sebaya Dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ekonomi Siswa Kelas X IIS SMA Negeri 1 Sewon Tahun Ajaran 2016/2017. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ekonomi, 7(2), 143-151. Retrieved from https://journal.student.uny.ac.id/ojs/index.php/ekonomi/article/view/10510/10203
Rukajat, A. (2018). Pendekatan penelitian kuantitatif: Quantitative research approach. Deepublish.
Sadikin, A., & Hamidah, A. (2020). Pembelajaran Daring di Tengah Wabah Covid-19. BIODIK: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, 6(02), 214-224. https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v6i2.9759
Sari, D.,K., Sufiana, J. M., Hadeli, M., Oktaria, Y., & Melinda, E. (2022). Development of a Virtual Laboratory for Biochemistry Practicum during the Covid 19 Pandemic. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 277- 282. DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.1171
Sari, D.,K., Ibrahim, A., R., Wancik, K., A. (2018). Designing biochemistry project with local materials to increased student’s creativity. The 3rd SULE-IC 2018.
Sari, D.,K., Permanasari, A., Supriyanti, F., M. (2017). Profile of students’ creative thinking skills on quantitative project- based protein testing using local materials. Journal Pendidikan IPA Indonesias, 6(1), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.9516
Soetrisno, D., & Yoku, O. (2019). Pengaruh Penerapan Asynchronous Learning dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 3(2), 58–66.
Sukaryawan, M., Saripah Salbiah binti Syed Abdul Azziza, Muhd Ibrahim bin Muhammad Damanhuri. (2018). Pengembangan modul laju reaksi berbasis konstruktivisme lima fase needham dan pengaruhnya terhadap hasil belajar siswa di Palembang. Jurnal penelitian pendidikan kimia: kajian hasil penelitian pendidikan kimia 5(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.36706/jppk.v5i1.8399
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Syukri, M. (2016). Model Pengajaran Konstruktivisme Lima Fase Needham dalam Pengintegrasian Pendidikan STEM. Prosseding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika, Universitas Syah Kuala. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjA36u0qIH8AhUDErcAHeZFABkQFnoECA4QAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fprofile%2FMuhammad_Syukri2%2Fpublication%2F315066623_Model_Pengajaran_Konstruktivisme_Lima_Fase_Needham_dalam_Pengintegrasian_Pendidikan_STEM%2Flinks%2F58c955b8458515751232971a%2FModel-Pengajaran-Konstruktivisme-Lima-Fase-Needham-dalam-Pengintegrasian-Pendidikan-STEM.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2fRtZ53oucRt2XJ9yFVTwT
Chear, S. L. S., & Norb M. Y. M. (2020). Intervensi Pembelajaran di Portal e-Pembelajaran Melalui Aplikasi Whatsapp dan Telegram Berdasarkan Model Lima Fasa Needham. Evaluation Studies in Social Sciences (2020) ISSN 2289-3180/eISSN 0128-0473/ Vol 9/ 2020 p. 11-27. Retrieved from http://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/ESSS
Zamista, A. A., Sellyana, A., & Rahmi, H. (2021). Persepsi Mahasiswa Terhadap Praktikum Daring Mata Kuliah Algoritma Dan Pemograman Ditinjau Dari Perbedaan Gender Adelia. Jurnal Dinamika Pendidikan. 14(2): 70–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51212/jdp.v14i2
Zitter, I., and A. Hoeve. (2012), “Hybrid Learning Environments: Merging Learning and Work Processes to Facilitate Knowledge Integration and Transitionsâ€, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 81, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k97785xwdvf-en
Author Biographies
Diah Kartika Sari, universitas sriwijaya
Made Sukaryawan, Universitas Sriwijaya
Sofia Sanjaya, Universitas Srijaya
Eka Ad'hiya, Universitas Sriwijaya
Annisa Nurjannah, Universitas Sriwijaya
Mega Wulandari, Universitas Sriwijaya
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Diah Kartika Sari, Made Sukaryawan, Sofia Sanjaya, Eka Ad'hiya, Annisa Nurjannah, Mega Wulandari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
