Development of integrated Assessment to Measure student’s Analytical Thinking Skills and Scientific Attitudes for Chemical Equilibrium Topic
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i2.2191Published:
2023-02-28Downloads
Abstract
Technological advances which are the parameters of the new era have an impact on the demands for increasing skills. The current demand for skills is in the form of 21st century skills, including analytical thinking skills. In addition, scientific attitudes are part of the science elements that are required to be mastered by students in this century, therefore it is necessary to have an instrument that can measure these two skills, based of this, an integrated assessment instrument is developed which aims to determine the characteristics of the instrument, the feasibility and the results of the measurement of an integrated assessment of students' analytical thinking skills and scientific attitudes on chemical equilibrium material for 11th grade of senior high school. All test subjects came from six schools in the city of Mataram, West Nusa Tenggara province. Sample take by stratified random sampling technique. The test results were analyzed using the Partial Credit Model 1 Parameter-Logistic (PCM 1-PL) approach in Item Response Theory (IRT) by the Winsteps program. All items were declared fit. The measurement results using this integrated assessment instrument show that students' analytical thinking skills and scientific attitudes on chemical equilibrium material are 36.5% in the moderate category
Keywords:
Analytical Thinking Skills, PCM 1-PL, IRT, Stratified Random Sampling, Scientific AttitudesReferences
Ad’hiya, E., & Laksono, E. W. (2018). Development and validation of An Integrated Assesement Instrument to Asess Student Analythical Thinking Skills in Chemical Literacy. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 241-256. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11416a
Akani, O. (2017). Identification of the areas of students’ difficulties in chemistry curriculum at the secondary school level. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Science and Technology, 4(4), 5071-5077. Retrieved from http://igmpublication.org/ijetst.in/index.php/ijetst/article/view/1008
Cahyani, A., & Khotimah, R. P. (2015). Peningkatan Pemahaman Konsep dan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika dengan Model Discovery Learning (PTK Pada Siswa Kelas VIIIA SMP Muhammadiyah 4 Sambi Boyolali Tahun 2015/2016). Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Retrieved from http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/39254.
Demars, C. (2010). Item response theory. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.
Demircioglu, G., Demircioglu, H., & Yadigaroglu, M. (2013). An investigation of chemistry teachers’ understanding of chemical equilibrium. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4(2), 192-199. Retrieved from http://ijonte.org/FileUpload/ks63207/File/19.demircioglu.pdf.
Dewi, N. L., Dantes, N., & Sadia, I. W. (2013). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Sikap Ilmiah Dan Hasil Belajar IPA. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Ganesha, 3(1), 1-10. Retrieved from https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/119287-ID-none.pdf
Didis, N. (2015). The analysis of analogy use in the teaching of introductory quantum theory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 335-376. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00011D.
Dolipas, B. B., Ramos, J. L. S., & Villamor, B. V. (2015). Quellmalz Higher Order Thinking Skills and Students' Academic Performance in Physics. Mountain Journal of Science and Interdisciplinary Research (formerly Benguet State University Research Journal), 73, 62-69. Retrieved from http://portal.bsu.edu.ph:8083/index.php/BRJ/article/view/36
Eskandar, F.A., Bayrami, M., Vahedic, S., & Ansar, V.A.A. (2013). The effect of instructional analogies in interaction with logical thinking ability on achievement and attitude toward chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(4), 566-575. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00036B.
Hambleton, R. K., Shavelson, R. J., Webb, N. M., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory (Vol. 2). Sage
Mardapi, D., & Kartowagiran, B. (2011). Pengembangan instrumen pengukur hasil belajar nirbias dan terskala baku. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 15(2), 326-341 http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pep.v15i2.1100.
Newby, T.J., & Stepich, D.A. (1987). Learning abstract concepts: The use of analogies as a mediational strategy. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(2), 20-26. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/30220840
Ozmen, H. 2008. Determination of students’ alternative conceptions about chemical equilibrium: a review of research and the case of Turkey. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(3), 225-233. https://doi.org/10.1039/B812411F.
Retnawati, H. (2014). Teori respon butir dan penerapannya. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.
Sadhu, S., & Laksono, E. W. (2018). Development and Validation of an Integrated Assessment for Measuring Critical Thinking and Chemical Literacy in Chemical Equilibrium. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 557-572. http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11338a
Shahani, V.M., & Jenkinson, J. (2016). The efficacy of interactive analogical models in the instruction of bond energy curves in undergraduate chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(2), 417-428. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00194C.
Smits, N., Cuijpers, P., & van Straten, A. (2011). Applying computerized adaptive testing to the CES-D scale: a simulation study. Pyschiatry Research, 188(1), 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2010.12.001.
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi pemodelan Rasch pada assessment pendidikan. Jakarta: Trim Komunikata.
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D., & Semmel, M. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: a sourcebook. Minneapolis, leadership training institute/special education: University of Minnesota. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED090725
Yilmaz, K., Altinkurt, Y., & Cokluk, O. (2011). Developing The Educational Belief Scale:The Validity And Reliabiliy Study. Educational Science: Theory and Practice, 11(1), 343-350. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ919905.pdf.
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Lalu Busyairi Muhsin, Endang Widjajanti Laksono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
