PENGEMBANGAN ALAT EVALUASI PEMBELAJARAN IPA YANG MENDUKUNG KETERAMPILAN ABAD 21

Authors

Agus Ramdani , A. Wahab Jufri , Gunawan Gunawan , Saprizal Hadisaputra , Lalu Zulkifli

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v5i1.221

Published:

2019-01-17

Issue:

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): January

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Ramdani, A., Jufri, A. W., Gunawan, G., Hadisaputra, S., & Zulkifli, L. (2019). PENGEMBANGAN ALAT EVALUASI PEMBELAJARAN IPA YANG MENDUKUNG KETERAMPILAN ABAD 21. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v5i1.221
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This study aims to develop learning devices, especially in the evaluation section of science learning in junior high school, which in turn after being implemented in the classroom is expected to develop 21st century skills of students. In particular, this study aims to, 1) identify science learning evaluation tools made by teachers so that they obtain a clear picture of the profile of the evaluation tool, 2) develop a junior high school science learning evaluation tool that supports 21st century skills. This research includes development research in four stages, namely: decide, design, develop, and evaluate. The results of this study indicate that the tools developed by the teacher are in complete category, the learning objectives are clear, although the stages in part still need to be improved. Learning evaluation instruments developed by the teacher have met the principles of assessment, the presentation is in accordance with the curriculum, the sentence in the question is quite communicative, uses good and correct language and does not cause multiple interpretations. However, the majority of questions made by teachers still measure low-level thinking skills. This is because teachers have not been trained in developing questions that measure high-level thinking skills. An evaluation tool that was then developed together with the teacher was intended to perfect the shortcomings of the previous evaluation tool

Keywords: 21st Century Skills, Learning Evaluation Tools, Middle School Science

References

Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., & Rumble, M. 2010. Defining 21st century skills. Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills draft white paper. The University of Melbourne.

Brookhart, S. M. 2010. How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD.

Collins, R. 2014. Skills for the 21st Century: teaching higher-order thinking. Curriculum & Leadership Journal, 12(14).

Darling-Hammond, L. 2012. Policy Frameworks for New Assessments., dalam Grifin, P., Care, E., & McGaw, B. (Eds), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp 301-339). London: Springer.

Greenstein, L. 2012. Assessing 21st Century Skills. A Guide to Evaluating Mastery and Authentic Learning. United State of America: SAGE Publication.

Gunawan, G., Sahidu, H., Harjono, A., & Suranti, N. M. Y. (2017b). The Effect of Project Based Learning with Virtual Media Assistance on Student's Creativity in Physics. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 36 (2)

Kemdikbud. 2017. Implementasi Pengembangan Kecakapan Abad 21 dalam Perencanaan Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP). Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan SMA Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Kemdikbud. 2016. Panduan Penilaian oleh Pendidik dan Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan SMP Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Kunandar. 2015. Penilaian Autentik (Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013). Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Lai, E.R., & Viering M. 2012. Assessing 21st Century Skills: Integrating Research Findings. Vancouver, B.C: National Council on Measurement in Education.

Lombardi, M. M. 2007. Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. Educause learning initiative, 1(2007), 1-12.

NC State University. 2014. Higher-order Skills in Critical and Creative Thinking. USA: North Carolina State Quality Enhancement Plan.

Partnership for 21st Century Skills. 2009. Assessment: A 21st Century Skills Implementation Guide.

Pratiwi, I. H. (2015). Kemampuan Guru Mata Pelajaran Ipa Dalam Pembuatan Soal HOT (Higher Order Thinking) Dan Kesesuaian Penulisan Soal Di Smp Negeri 1 Kragan Rembang (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).

Pratiwi, U., & Fasha, E. F. 2015. Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian HOTS Berbasis Kurikulum 2013 Terhadap Sikap Disiplin. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 1(1), 123-142.

Rahman, M. H. (2013). Pedagogical CompetenceJunior High School Science Teacher. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Seminar on Quality and Affordable Education (ISQAE 2013) (pp. 383-388).

Sahidu, H., Gunawan, G., Rokhmat, J., & Rahayu, S. 2018. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Berorientasi Pada Kreativitas Calon Guru. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 4(1), 1-6.

Wade, C. 1995. Using Writing to Develop and Assess Critical Thinking. Teaching of Psychology, 22 (1): 24-28.

Widodo, G., & Joko, J. 2015. Pengembangan Dan Implementasi Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek. Innovation of Vocational Technology Education, 11(1).

Yuniar, M., Rakhmat, C. R., & Saepulrohman, A. 2015. Analisis HOTS (High Order Thinking Skills) pada Soal Objektif Tes dalam Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial (IPS) Kelas V SD Negeri 7 Ciamis. PEDADIDAKTIKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 2(2), 187-195.

Author Biographies

Agus Ramdani, 1. Program Studi Magister Pendidikan IPA Universitas Mataram 2. Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Mataram

A. Wahab Jufri, 1. Program Studi Magister Pendidikan IPA Universitas Mataram 2. Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Mataram

Gunawan Gunawan, 1. Program Studi Magister Pendidikan IPA Universitas Mataram 2. Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Mataram

Saprizal Hadisaputra, 1. Program Studi Magister Pendidikan IPA Universitas Mataram 2. Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Mataram

Lalu Zulkifli, 1. Program Studi Magister Pendidikan IPA Universitas Mataram 2. Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Mataram

License

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).