Development of Wood and Pulp Chemicals in Wood Sub Materials and Fiber Morphology as Teaching Material Supplements
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i7.2253Published:
2023-07-25Downloads
Abstract
This development research aims to develop wood and pulp chemicals in wood and fiber morphology as supplementary teaching materials for students of the Chemical Education study program at Sriwijaya University using the 4STMD (Four Step Teaching Materials Development) method. The steps of the 4STMD method, namely the first stage is the selection stage, carried out by analyzing needs, curriculum and analyzing the material by looking for references in various sources. The second stage, namely the structuring stage, is carried out by adding or subtracting material and compiling the material. The third stage is the characterization stage, carried out by developing the results of material analysis. The fourth stage is the didactic reduction stage, but the researcher did not carry out the didactic reduction stage. Data collection techniques used in the form of interviews, pre-research questionnaires and validation questionnaires. In the material validation test, the validity of teaching materials was obtained based on the Aiken coefficient of 0.75 which was categorized as high. Based on these results, it shows that the development of wood and pulp chemicals in wood sub-materials and fiber morphology has met the valid criteria.
Keywords:
Constructivism Needham’s 5–phases Qualitative analysis of protein Student perceptionReferences
Agarwal, H., & Pandey, G. N. (2013). Impact of E-Learning in Education. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 2(12), 146-148. Retrieved from https://www.ijsr.net/getabstract.php?paperid=02013558
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
Anwar, S. (2019). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan Validitas (Edisi 4). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Bartley, S. J., & Golek, J. H. (2004). Evaluating the Cost Effectiveness of Online and Face-to-Face Instruction. Educational Technology & Society, 7(4), 167–175. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.7.issue-4
Brydges, S. (2016). Chemistry in Context: Integrating Chemical Information Literacy, Scientific Writing, and Contemporary Issues in the First-Year Undergraduate Curriculum. ACS Symposium Series, 1232(5), 105-120. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2016-1232.ch005
Buhari, B. A. & Roko, A. (2017). An Improved E-learning System. Saudi Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2(2), 114-118. Retrieved from http://scholarsmepub.com/sjeat-22/
Busljeta, R. (2013). Effective Use of Teaching and Learning Resources. Czech-Polish Historical and Pedagogical Journal, 5(2), 55-69. Retrieved from https://www.ped.muni.cz/cphpjournal/520132/06.pdf
Chow, A. S., & Croxton, R. A. (2017). Designing A Responsive E-learning Infrastructure: Systemic Change in Higher Education. American Journal of Distance Education, 31(1), 20-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2017.1262733.
Divayana, D. G. H. (2017). Evaluation of E-learning Utilization Using CSE-UCLA Model. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 36(2), 280-289. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v36i2.12853.
Du, Z., Fu, X., Zhao, C., Liu, Q., & Liu, T. (2013). Interactive and Collaborative E-learning Platform with Integrated Social Software and Learning Management System. Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Information Technology and Software Engineering. Berlin: Springer, pp. 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34531-9_2.
Ehlers, U. D. (2011). Quality in e-learning from a learner’s perspective. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. https://doi.org/10.4000/dms.2707
Florin, M., Stanciu, A., & Aleca, O. (2011). Changing Learning Environment through Technology. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, 13(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.29302/oeconomica.2011.13.1.5
Garad, A., Al-Ansi, A. M., & Qamari, I. N. (2021). The Role of E-learning Infrastructure and Cognitive Competence in Distance Learning Effectiveness during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.33474
Hendryadi, H. (2017). Validitas Isi: Tahap Awal Pengembangan Kuesioner. Jurnal Riset Manajemen dan Bisnis (JRMB) Fakultas Ekonomi UNIAT, 2(2), 169-178. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323255432
Kadtsyna, A. S., Chubarov, A. S., & Kadtsyn, E. D. (2022). Basic Cheminformatics Course for First-Year Chemistry Students. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(8), 2932-2942. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00175
Kapur, R. (2019). Development of Teaching-Learning Materials. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334083571
Nguyen, T. (2015). The Effectiveness of Online Learning: Beyond No Significant Difference and Future Horizons. MERLOT: Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 309-319. Retrieved from https://jolt.merlot.org/Vol11no2/Nguyen_0615.pdf
Pannen, P., & Purwanto, P. (2001). Penulisan Bahan Ajar. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Tarigan, H. G., & Tarigan, D. (2009). Telaah Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia. Bandung: Angkasa.
Wang, K. H., Wang, T. H., Wang, W.-L., & Huang, S. C. (2006). Learning Styles and Formative Assessment Strategy: Enhancing Student Achievement in Web-based Learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(3), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00166.x
Widodo, C. S., & Jasmadi, J. (2008). Panduan Menyusun Bahan Ajar Berbasis Kompetensi. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo.
Xu, D., Huang, W. W., Wang, H., & Heales, J. (2014). Enhancing E-learning Effectiveness Using An Intelligent Agent-Supported Personalized Virtual Learning Environment: An Empirical Investigation. Information & Management, 51(4), 430–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.02.009
Yeagley, A. A., Porter, S. E. G., Rhoten, M. C., & Topham, B. (2016). The Stepping Stone Approach to Teaching Chemical Information Skills. J. Chem. Educ, 93(3), 423-428. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00389
Zhao, Y., Lei, J., Yan, B., Lai, C., & Tan, S. (2005). What Makes the Difference? A Practical Analysis of Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Education. The Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1836–1884. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00544.x
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ressa Maria Lestari, Christa Rieza, Ayu Agustin, Sanjaya, Andi Suharman, Muhammad Hadeli, Diah Kartika Sari, Eka Ad’hiya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
