Students Scientific Literacy Profile of Mathematics Education Study Program in Chemistry Subjects

Authors

Natalia Peni , Melania Priska , Yosephina Payu Wao

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.2295

Published:

2022-12-30

Issue:

Vol. 8 No. 6 (2022): December

Keywords:

Chemistry subject, Reasonable category, Scientific literacy

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Peni, N., Priska, M., & Wao, Y. P. . (2022). Students Scientific Literacy Profile of Mathematics Education Study Program in Chemistry Subjects . Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(6), 3050–3054. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.2295

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This study aims to describe the scientific literacy profile of students in the mathematics education study program in chemistry subjects. The research method is descriptive quantitative research, with the research subject being the second semester students of the Mathematics Education Study Program at the University of Flores in 2021/2022 academic year, totaling 29 peoples. The data resource from the questionnaires, which was based on the aspect of competence. Furthermore, the scientific literacy student competency test questions were tested for validity and reliability, then continued with a final score test to interpret descriptively student learning outcomes. The results of the scientific literacy profile of prospective teachers mathematics at the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education,  Flores University consist of 5 indicators, namely, identifying and explaining scientific phenomena, getting a score of 75.45, which is good category;  evaluating and designing scientific questions, getting score of 55.75, which is reasonable category; interpreting data and evidence scientifically, getting a score of 62.25 which is reasonable category; creating a good graph, getting a score of 57.55 which is reasonable category; problem-solving skills, getting a score of 60.25 which is reasonable category; understanding and interpreting data, getting a score of 45.00 which is very much less category; and the ability to draw conclusions, getting a score of 77.00 which is good category. These results performed that scientific literacy skills of students are reasonable category.

References

Ahmad, I., Ur Rehman, K., Ali, A., Khan, I., & Khan, F. A. (2014). Critical Analysis of the Problems of Education in Pakistan: Possible Solutions. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 3(2), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v3i2.1805

Anazifa, R. D., & Djukri. (2017). Project- based learning and problem- based learning: Are they effective to improve student’s thinking skills? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 346–355. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.11100

Bagasta, A. R., Rahmawati, D., Dzahra, M. F. Y. M., Wahyuni, I. P., & Prayitno, B. A. (2018). Profile of the Scientific Literacy Ability of Students in One of the State Senior High Schools of Sragen City. Pedagogia. Jurnal Pendidikan, 7(2), 121–129. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1184-6063.

Cahyani, H., & Setyawati, R. W. (2017). The importance of increasing problem-solving abilities through PBL to prepare a superior generation to face MEA. PRISMA, Proceedings of the National Mathematics Seminar, 151–160. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/21635.

Destalia, L., Suratno, & Hariani, S. P. (2014). Improving Problem Solving Skills and Learning Outcomes through the Application of Problem-Based Learning (PBM) with Experimental Methods on Environmental Pollution Materials. Pancaran, 3(4), 213–224. https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/pancaran/article/view/1003.

Fang, Z. (2005). Scientific literacy: A systemic functional linguistics perspective. Science Education, 89(2), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20050

Fang, Z., & Coatoam, S. (2013). Disciplinary literacy: What you want to know about it. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 56(8), 627–632. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.190

Fitriani, Y., & Azis, I. A. (2019). Literacy Era of the Industrial Revolution 4.0. Proceedings of SENASBASA (Seminar Nasional Bahasa Dan Sastra, 100–104. https://doi.org/10.22219/.v3i1.2592.

Goldman, S. R., Britt, M. A., Brown, W., Cribb, G., George, M. A., Greenleaf, C., Lee, C. D., & Shanahan, C. (2016). Disciplinary Literacies and Learning to Read for Understanding: A Conceptual Framework for Disciplinary Literacy. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1168741

Hendri, S., & M, H. (2019). Identifikasi Literasi Sains Mahasiswa (Studi Kasus Mahasiswa STISIP Amal Ilmiah Yapis Wamena). Journal of Natural Science and Integration, 2(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.24014/jnsi.v2i1.7117

Hubbard, K. (2021). Disciplinary literacies in STEM: what do undergraduates read, how do they read it, and can we teach scientific reading more effectively? Higher Education Pedagogies, 6(1), 41–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2021.1882326

Irwan, A. P. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Pesrta Didik Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Soal Fisika Di Sman 2 Bulukumba. Jurnal Sains Dan Pendidikan Fisika, 15(3), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.35580/jspf.v15i3.13494

Kurniasih, W., Wulan, A. R., & Nuraeni, E. (2021). Initial Profile of 21st Century Competencies of High School Students in Skills in Evaluating and Designing Scientific Investigations on Covid-19 Content. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains dan Entrepreneurshiip VII Tahun 2021, 57-62. http://conference.upgris.ac.id/index.php/snse/article/view/2077.

Maysaroh, S., Luliani, E., & Wulandari, A. (2021). The Relationship of Understanding Mathematical Concepts to Chemistry Learning Outcomes. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan STKIP Kusuma Negara III (pp. 214–221). https://jurnal.stkipkusumanegara.ac.id/index.php/semnara2020/article/view/1138.

Merta, I. W., Artayasa, I. P., Kusmiyati, K., Lestari, N., & Setiadi, D. (2020). Profil Literasi Sains dan Model Pembelajaran dapat Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Sains. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 15(3), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v15i3.1889

Minarni, A., Napitupulu, E. E., & Husein, R. (2016). Mathematical understanding and representation ability of public junior high school in North Sumatra. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.7.1.2816.43-56

Novitasari, N. (2018). Profil Kemampuan Literasi Sains Mahasiswa Calon Guru Biologi. Biosfer : Jurnal Tadris Biologi, 9(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.24042/biosf.v9i1.2877

Nudiati, D., & Sudiapermana, E. (2020). Literacy as a 21st Century Life Skill in Students. Indonesian Journal of Learning Education and Counseling, 3(1), 34–40. https://journal.ilininstitute.com/index.php/IJoLEC.

Pratiwi, S. N., Cari, C., & Aminah, N. S. (2019). 21st Century Science Learning With Students’ Scientific Literacy. Journal of Materials and Learning Physics (JMPF), 9(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.20961/jmpf.v9i1.31612.

Rahmawaty, S., Nurhayati, & Arsyad, M. (2020). Kemampuan Menarik Kesimpulan Peserta Didik yang Menggunakan LKPD Pertanyaan Pengarah Kelas XI MIA 2 SMAN 11 Makassar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika PPs UNM, 2, 33–36. https://ojs.unm.ac.id/semnasfisika/issue/view/983

Setiawan, B., Innatesari, D. K., Sabtiawan, W. B., & Sudarmin, S. (2017). The development of local wisdom-based natural science module to improve science literation of students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.9595

Setyowati, D. (2019). Training in Making Graphs in Microsoft Excel for Data Processing and Presentation. Jurnal Dharma Bakti-LPPM IST AKPRIND Yogyakarta, 2(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.34151/dharma.v2i2.2031.

Shanahan, C., Shanahan, T., & Misischia, C. (2011). Analysis of Expert Readers in Three Disciplines: History, Mathematics, and Chemistry. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 393–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X11424071

Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101

Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2012). What Is Disciplinary Literacy and Why Does It Matter? Topics in Language Disorders, 32(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e318244557a

Shepherd, M. D., Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2012). University Students’ Reading of Their First-Year Mathematics Textbooks. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 14(3), 226–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2012.682959

Syofyan, H., & Amir, T. L. (2019). Application of Science Literacy in Science Learning for Prospective Elementary Teachers. Journal Pendidikan Dasar, 10(2), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.21009/10.21009/JPD.081

Widiana, I. W., & Jampel, I. N. (2016). Improving Students’ Creative Thinking and Achievement through The Implementation of Multiple Intelligence Approach with Mind Mapping. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 5(3), 246. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v5i3.4546

Author Biographies

Natalia Peni, Universitas Flores

Melania Priska, Flores University

Yosephina Payu Wao, Flores University

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Natalia Peni, Melania Priska, Yosephina Payu Wao

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).