The Effect of Differentiated Approach in Inquiry-based Learning on Senior High School Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Work and Energy Topic

Authors

Devi Ayu Nur'aini , Winny Liliawati , Hera Novia

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2374

Published:

2023-01-31

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): January

Keywords:

Conceptual Understanding, Differentiated Approach, Inquiry-based Learning

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Nur'aini, D. A., Liliawati, W. ., & Novia, H. . (2023). The Effect of Differentiated Approach in Inquiry-based Learning on Senior High School Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Work and Energy Topic. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2374
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the effect of the differentiated approach on high school students' conceptual understanding of the work and energy topic. The research method used is a quantitative method. Two classes of 10th graders in one of the Senior High Schools in the Tangerang districts were chosen to be research participants with cluster random sampling. Data collection was done with learning style questionnaire and conceptual understanding item with a reliability 0.73. The experimental class applied Inquiry-based Learning with differentiation, while the control class applied Inquiry-based Learning without differentiation. The results of the different tests of students' conceptual understanding after learning showed a significant difference in the understanding of students' concepts in the two classes. The effect size score showed a large effect of a differentiated approach on students' conceptual understanding. The analysis of the level of students' conceptual understanding for each subtopic showed the Law of Conservation of Mechanical Energy having the most students at irresponsiveness level, while the subtopics with the highest number of students at the understanding level was the work subtopic. The percentage of students who studied with a differentiated approach at the highest understanding level is more than students without a differentiated approach in all subtopics. Although the application of the differentiated approach had obstacles in online learning, the differentiated approach applied in Inquiry based Learning has a positive impact in facilitating the diversity of student learning styles.

References

Akbaş, Y., Uzunöz, A., & Gençtürk, E. (2010). High school 9th grade student’s understanding level of conceptions related to atmosphere and misconceptions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1699–1704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.387

Ariani, S., Rahayu, Y. S., & Susantini, E. (2018). The Influence of Inquiry Method on Student Learning Result with Different Class Learning Style on Plantae Material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012036

Blessing, A., Emmanuel, N., & Chinyere, E. (2021). Effect of Differentiated Instruction on Students’ Achievement in Geometry. International Journal for Research in Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.31033/ijrasb.8.3.2

Borovay, L. A., Shore, B. M., Caccese, C., Yang, E., & Hua, O. L. (2019). Flow, Achievement Level, and Inquiry-Based Learning. Journal of Advanced Academic, 30(1), 74–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X18809659

Box, C. (2015). Formative Assessment in United States Classrooms. Springer Nature: Switzerland.

Demirbag, M., & Gunel, M. (2014). Integrating Argument-Based Science Inquiry with Modal Representations: Impact on Science Achievement, Argumentation, and Writing Skills. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(1), 386–391. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.1.1632

Dienyati, N. H., Werdhiana, I. K., & Wahyono, U. (2020). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Siswa berdasarkan Multirepresentasi pada Materi Usaha dan Energi Kelas XI SMAN 1 Banawa Tengah. Jurnal Kreatif Online, 8(1), 74–84. Retrieved from: http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/JKTO/article/view/15683/11541

Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum: A Vision. Topoi, 37(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4

Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple Intelligences. Basic Book: Newyork.

Hariyanto, Joyoatmojo, S., Nurkamto, J., & Gunarhadi. (2019). Developing inquiry-based learning materials to promote students’ academic achievement. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.1.4

Herawati, A., Astra, I. M., & Supriyati, Y. 2021. The effect of inquiry learning model and logical mathematical intelligence on the learning outcomes of high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1816(012010). https://doi.org/0.1088/1742-6596/1816/1/012010

Hermawati, N. W. M. (2012). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Biologi Dan Sikap Ilmiah Siswa Sma Ditinjau Dari Minat Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 2(2), 1–30. Retrieved from https://ejournal-pasca.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_ipa/article/view/488/280

Idrus, F., Asri, N. A. Z., & Baharom, N. N. (2021). Has differentiated instruction gone ‘awry’ in online teaching and learning? Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(3), 501–510. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1203.21

Kado, K., Dorji, N., Dem, N., & Om, D. (2021). The effect of differentiated instruction on academic achievement of grade eleven students in the field of derivative in Bhutan. International Journal of Educational Studies in Social Sciences, 2(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.53402/ijesss.v2i1.37

Kassiavera, S., Suparmi, A., Cari, C., & Sukarmin, S. (2019). Student’s understanding profile about work-energy concept based on multirepresentation skills. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2202(020060). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5141673

Kumar Shah, R. (2019). Effective Constructivist Teaching Learning in the Classroom. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 7(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v7i4.600

Lazonder, A. W., Janssen, N., Gijlers, H., & Walraven, A. (2021). Patterns of Development in Children’s Scientific Reasoning: Results from a Three-Year Longitudinal Study. Journal of Cognition and Development, 22(1), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2020.1814293

Piraksa, C., Srisawasdi, N., & Koul, R. (2014). Effect of Gender on Student’s Scientific Reasoning Ability: A Case Study in Thailand. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 486–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.245

Pramesti, Y. S., Mahmudi, H., & Setyowidodo, I. 2020. Analyzing Students’ Understanding of Work-Energy Concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(022016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/2/022016

Putra, U. S., & Masruri, M. S. (2019). The Effectiveness Comparison Between Inquiry and Problem Based Learning Towards Geography Learning Outcomes. Geosfera Indonesia, 4(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.19184/geosi.v4i2.10849

Malacapay, M. C. (2019). Differentiated Instruction in Relation to Pupils’ Learning Style. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 625–638. doi: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12440a

Magableh, I. S. I., & Abdullah, A. (2020). On the effectiveness of differentiated instruction in the enhancement of jordanian students’ overall achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 533–548. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13237a

Maison, M., Lestari, N., & Windyaningtyas, A. (2020). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi Usaha Dan Energi. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v6i1.314

Mello, P. S., Natale, C. C., Trivelato, S. L. F., Marzin-Janvier, P., Vieira, L. Q., & Manzoni-de-Almeida, D. (2019). Exploring the inquiry-based learning structure to promote scientific culture in the classrooms of higher education sciences. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 47(6), 672–680. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21301

Mills, S. (2016). Conceptual understanding: A concept analysis. Qualitative Report, 21(3), 546–557. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2308

Moore, J. C., & Rubbo, L. J. (2012). Scientific reasoning abilities of nonscience majors in physics-based courses. Physics Education Research. 8(010106). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010106

Muchoyimah, S., Kusairi, S., & Mufti, N. (2016). Identifikasi Kesulitan Siswa pada Topik Usaha dan Energi. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Fisika, 1, 492–500. Retrieved from http://pasca.um.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Surayatum-Muchoyimah-492-500.pdf

Muchoyimah, S., Kusairi, S., & Mufti, N. (2020). Korelasi Penalaran Ilmiah dengan Penguasaan Konsep Siswa pada Topik Usaha dan Energi. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Fisika, 4(2), 104–109. Retrieved from: http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jrpf/

Nasar, A., & Kurniati, K. (2020). Comparing Students’ Learning Outcomes Using Problem Based Learning Model and Inquiry Based Learning Model. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v8i1.2127

Rivaldo, L., Taqwa, M. R. A., Zainuddin, A., & Faizah, R. (2020). Analysis of students’ difficulties about work and energy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(032088). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/3/032088

Rais, M. A., Amin, M., & Lukiati, B. (2021). Inquiry Based on Research Results of Gene Variation Analysis To Increase Cognitive Learning Outcomes Undergraduate Biology. BIOEDUKASI: Jurnal Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 19(1), 9–14. Retrieved from https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/BIOED/article/view/20722

Samsudin, A., Afif, N. F., Nugraha, M. G., Suhandi, A., Fratiwi, N. J., Aminudin, A. H., Adimayuda, R., Linuwih, S., & Costu, B. (2021). Reconstructing Students’ Misconceptions on Work and Energy through the PDEODE*E Tasks with Think-Pair-Share. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(1), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.56

Santika, R., & Herdi, H. (2020). Using A Constructivist Approach to Improve Students’ Comprehension in Reading Descriptive Text at The Seventh Grade of SMP Negeri 24 Pekanbaru. Elsya : Journal of English Language Studies, 2(2), 62–66. Retrieved from: http://ojs.journal.unilak.ac.id/index.php/elsya.

Serafín, Č., Dostál, J., & Havelka, M. (2015). Inquiry-Based Instruction in the Context of Constructivism. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 592–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.050

Sochibin, A., Dwijananti, P., & Marwoto, P. (2009). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terpimpin Untuk Peningkatan Pemahaman Dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SD. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 5, 96–101. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v5i2.1017

Song, Y. (2018). Improving primary students’ collaborative problem solving competency in project-based science learning with productive failure instructional design in a seamless learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(4), 979–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9600-3

Sternberg, R. J., & Zhang, L. (2010). Styles of Thinking as a Basis of Differentiated Instruction. Theory into Practice, 4(3), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4403_9

Taras, M. (2010). Assessment for learning: Assessing the theory and evidence. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3015–3022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.457

Tiruneh, D. T., De Cock, M., Weldeslassie, A. G., Elen, J., & Janssen, R. (2017). Measuring Critical Thinking in Physics: Development and Validation of a Critical Thinking Test in Electricity and Magnetism. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 663–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9723-0

Tulbure, C. (2013). The Effects of Differentiated Approach in Higher Education: An Experimental Investigation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 76, 832–836. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.215

Tomlinson, C. A., & Moon, T. R. (2013). Assessment and Student Success in a Differentiated Classroom. ASCD: Virginia.

Xenofontos, N. A., Hovardas, T., Zacharia, Z. C., & de Jong, T. (2020). Inquiry-based learning and retrospective action: Problematizing student work in a computer-supported learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12384

Yusrizal, A Halim, & Junike. (2017). the Development of Questionnaire To Investigate Students’ Attitudes and Approaches in Physics Problem Solving. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 13(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v13i2.10152

Author Biographies

Devi Ayu Nur'aini, UPI

Winny Liliawati, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Hera Novia, Unversitas Pendidikan Indonesia

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Devi Ayu Nur'aini, Winny Liliawati, Hera Novia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).