Development of Assessment Instruments in Project-Based Learning to Measure Students Scientific Literacy and Creative Thinking Skills on Work and Energy Materials
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.2421Published:
2023-06-25Issue:
Vol. 9 No. 6 (2023): JuneKeywords:
Assessment instruments, Creative thinking skills, Project-based learning, Scientific literacy skillsResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This study aims to develop a project-based learning assessment instrument to measure scientific literacy and students creative thinking skills on work and energy material that is valid, reliable, and practical to use. The method used is Research and Development (R&D) using 7 development steps adapted from Borg & Gall (1989). The results of the expert validation of the scientific literacy skills assessment instrument and students creative thinking skills were declared valid with a very high category. In the results of the data test analysis, there were 20 questions on the scientific literacy ability instrument and 18 questions on the creative material of the thinking ability instrument which were declared valid. Meanwhile, in the practicality test, this assessment instrument obtained very high criteria. based on the results that have been obtained, the final product is a project-based learning assessment to measure students’ scientific literacy and creative thinking abilities in the developed business and energy material that meets the eligibility standards of the instrument, that is valid, reliable and practical.
References
Asrizal, A., Festiyed, F., & Sumarmin, R. (2017). Analysis of the Need for the Development of Integrated Science Teaching Materials Containing Digital Era Literacy for The Learning of Eighth Grade Junior High School Students. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (JEP, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol1-iss1/27
Bang, L. (2018). In the Maw of the Ouroboros: An Analysis of Scientific Literacy and Democracy. Cult Stud of Sci Educ, 13(1), 807–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9808-2
Bari, A. J. I., Muslimin, I., & Yuliani, Y. (2020). Development of Skills Performance Assessment Instruments to Make a Simple Respirometer Laboratory Tool. JPBIO (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 5(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.31932/jpbio.v5i1.581
Batlolona, J. R., Diantoro, M., Wartono, & Latifah, E. (2019). Creative Thinking Skills Students in Physics on Solid Material Elasticity. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10265a
Benjamin, T. E., Marks, B., Demetrikopoulos, D., K., M., Rose, J., Pollard, E., Thomas, A., Muldrow, M., & L, L. (2017). Development and Validation of Scientific Literacy Scale for College Preparedness in STEM with Freshmen from Diverse Institutions. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 607–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9710-x
Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch Analysis in the Human Science. Springer.
Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1989). Educational Research: An Introduction. New York: Longman Inc.
Erisa, H., Hadiyanti, A. H. D., & Saptoro, A. (2021). Project Based Learning Model to Improve Students Creative Thinking Skills and Learning Outcomes. JPD: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 12(1), 1–11. Retrieved from https://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/jpd/article/view/20754
Fuadi, H., Robbia, A. Z., Jamaluddin, J., & Jufri, A. W. (2020). Analysis of the Factors Causing the Low Ability of Students’ Scientific Literacy. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 5(2), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v5i2.122
Hasana, I., Saptasari, M., & Wulandari, N. (2017). Development of Scientific Literacy Ability Assessment Instruments for Class XI Students on Excretion and Coordination System Materials at SMAN 9 Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Universitas Negeri Malang, 8(2), 52–56. https://doi.org/10.17977/um052v8i2p52-56
Herpiana, R., Rosidin, U., & Abdurrahman, A. (2018). Development of Instrument for Assessing Students’ Critical and Creative Thinking Ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012054
Lin, C. L. (2017). The Development of an Instrument to Measure the Project Competences of College Students in Online Project-Based Learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9708-y
Linacre, J. (2006). A user’s guide to Winsteps: Rasch model computer programs. Winsteps.
Markula, A., & Aksela, M. (2022). The Key Characteristics of Project-Based Learning: How Teachers Implement Projects in K-12 Science Education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00042-x
Munandar, U. (2009). Development of Gifted Children’s Creativity. PT Rineka Cipta.
Rizal, R., Rusdiana, D., Setiawan, W., & Siahaan, P. (2020). Creative thinking skills of prospective physics teacher. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(2), 022012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/2/022012
Rohmah, I., & Hidayati, S. (2021). Analysis of Scientific Literacy of SMPN 1 Gresik Students. Pensa: E-Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 9(3), 363–369. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/pensa/article/view/40178
Rosidin, U. (2017). Learning Evaluation and Assessment. Media Academy.
Rosidin, U., Fitria, D., & Sesunan, F. (2022). Development of Assessment Instruments to Measure Collaboration and Responsibility Skills of Students in Physics Learning on Cased Method-Based. AMPLITUDO: Journal of Science and Technology Innovation, 1(2), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.56566/amplitudo.v1i2.7
Rosidin, U., Kadaritna, N., & Hasnunidah, N. (2019). Can argument-driven inquiry models have impact on critical thinking skills for students with differentpersonality types? Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(3), 511–526. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i3.24725
Rosidin, U., Suyanta, A., & Abdurrahman, A. (2019). A Combined HOTS-Based Assessment/STEM Learning Model to Improve Secondary Students’ Thinking Skills: A Development and Evaluation Study. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 435–448. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.518464
Rusilowati, A. (2018). Assessment of Science Literacy: Analysis of Instrument Characteristics and Student Abilities Using Rasch Model Modern Test Theory. Proceedings of the 3rd Riau University Physics National Converence, 2–15. Retrieved from https://snf.fmipa.unri.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/0.-300B-2-15NI.pdf
Sari, D. N. A., Rusilowati, A., & Nuswowati, M. (2017). The Effect of Project-Based Learning on Students Science Literacy Ability. Pancasakti Science Education Journal, 2(2), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.24905/psej.v2i2.741
Scaradozzi, D., Screpanti, L., Cesaretti, L., Storti, M., & Mazzieri, E. (2019). Correction to: Implementation and Assessment Methodologies of Teachers’ Training Courses for STEM Activities. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24(269), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-019-09406-9
Sıburıan, J., Corebıma, A. D., İbrohim, & Saptasarı, M. (2019). The Correlation Between Critical and Creative Thinking Skills on Cognitive Learning Results. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 19(81), 99–114. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ejer/issue/45577/572934
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Application of Rasch Modeling in Educational Assessment. Tim komunikata.
Suripah, S., & Sthephani, A. (2017). Students Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability in Solving Power Roots of Complex Equations Based on Academic Ability Level. PYTHAGORAS: Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v12i2.16509
Sutrisna, N. (2021). Analysis of Scientific Literacy Capability of High School Students in Sungai penuh City. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 1(12), 2683–2694. https://doi.org/10.47492/jip.v1i12.530
Suyatna, A., Viyanti, V., & Rosidin, U. (2020). Optimizing Computer-Based Hots Instruments: An Analysis of Test Items, Stimulus, and Quiz Setting Based on Physics Teachers’ Perceptions. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(3D), 97 – 105. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081714
Yusnaeni, Y., Corebima, A. D., Susilo, H., & Zubaidah, S. (2017). Creative thinking of low academic student undergoing search solve create and share learning integrated with metacognitive strategy. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.10216a
Zhuang, T., Cheung, A. C. K., Lau, W. W. F., & Tang, Y. (2019). Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure STEM Undergraduate Students’ Comprehensive Educational Process. Frontiers of Education in China, 14(4), 575–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-019-0028-2
Author Biographies
Undang Rosidin, Lampung University, Physics Education, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
Dwi Herliani, Lampung University, Physics Education, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
Viyanti, Lampung University, Physics Education, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Undang Rosidin, Dwi Herliani, Viyanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).