Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): January
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

The Implementation of English for Biology Based on CLIL Student Handbook to Improve English Proficiency of Prospective Student Biology Teacher

Authors

A Wahab Jufri , Bachtiar Imam , Aulia Dwi Amalina Wahab , Andra Ade Riyanto

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2437

Published:

2023-01-31

Downloads

Abstract

The ability to communicate using English is an important pillar in establishing international cooperation in the era of Society 5,0. The Faculty of Teacher Training and Education (FKIP) serves as one of the faculty that must facilitate prospective educators. This study aims to examine the contribution of the implementation of English for Biology: Student Handbook through a Content Language Integrated Learning (CLIL)-based learning approach to improve the English proficiency of prospective teacher students in the Biology Education study program, FKIP. The research was carried out with a quasi-experimental approach (quasi-experimental research) with a multiple-group pretest-posttest pattern. The test subjects and the unit of analysis are all second-semester students who take English for Biology lectures at the Biology Education Study Program, FKIP in the 2021/2022 academic year with a total of 6 classes (A, B, C, D, E, and F). The results of the analysis show that there is an increase in students' English proficiency which is in the quite effective category with the acquisition of N-gain scores for classes A, B, C, D, E, and F of 68, 58, 60, 62, 58, and 61. The average value The average N-gain of the English language proficiency of biology education students is 68 with a fairly effective category. Therefore, the use of English for Biology: Student Handbook through a CLIL-based learning approach is quite effective in increasing the English proficiency of prospective educators in the Biology Education Study Program, FKIP, University of Mataram.

Keywords:

CLIL English proficiency Prospective student

References

Chostelidou, D., & Griva, E. (2014). Measuring the Effect of Implementing CLIL in Higher Education: An Experimental Research Project. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2169–2174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.538

Cimermanová, I. (2020). On Developing Materials for CLIL. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 1, 86. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol1.4809

Coletta, V. P., & Steinert, J. J. (2020). Why normalized gain should continue to be used in analyzing preinstruction and postinstruction scores on concept inventories. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010108

Hendroanto, A., Istiandaru, A., Syakrina, N., Setyawan, F., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Hidayat, A. S. E. (2018). How Students Solves PISA Tasks: An Overview of Students’ Mathematical Literacy. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 2(2), 129. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v2i2.10713

Heras, A., & Lasagabaster, D. (2015). The impact of CLIL on affective factors and vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 19(1), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541736

Hudson, P. (2009). Learning to teach science using English as the medium of instruction. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(2), 165–170. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75268

Hurajova, A. (2019). Contribution of CLIL methodology to the development of bilingualism and bilingual language competence of slovak secondary-school students. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 905–919. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.905

Kulamikhina, I., Kamysheva, E., Samylova, O., Balobanova, A., & Rakhmetova, E. (2020). Development of Professional Communication Skills in Students in the ESP Class: Integration of Communicative and Critical Thinking Approaches. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on Philosophy of Education, Law and Science in the Era of Globalization PELSEG, 210 –215. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200723.043

Lee, O., & Buxton, C. A. (2013). Integrating Science And English Proficiency For English Language Learners. Theory into Practice, 52(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2013.743772

Moghadam, N. Z., & Fatemipour, H. (2014). The Effect of CLIL on Vocabulary Development by Iranian Secondary School EFL Learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 2004–2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.635

Musikhin, I. A. (2016). English for Specific Purposes: Teaching English for Science and Technology. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 3(6), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-III-6-29-2016

Pérez, M. L., & Malagón, C. G. (2017). Creating Materials with ICT for CLIL Lessons: A Didactic Proposal. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 633–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.029

Rahman, M. (2015). English for Specific Purposes (ESP): A Holistic Review. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 24–31. https://www.hrpub.org/journals/article_info.php?aid=2200.

Rao, V. C. S. (2014). Teaching Strategies Of English For Science And Technology ( EST ) Research Methods of data collection Research findings. International Conference on English Language and Literature (ICELL – 2014, 27–30. https://www.academia.edu/

Author Biographies

A Wahab Jufri, SCOPUS ID: 57194385050, Mataram University, Magister of Science Education

Author Origin : Indonesia

Bachtiar Imam, University of Mataram

Author Origin : Indonesia

Aulia Dwi Amalina Wahab, University of Mataram

Author Origin : Indonesia

Andra Ade Riyanto, University of Mataram

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Jufri, A. W., Imam, B. ., Wahab, A. D. A. ., & Riyanto, A. A. . (2023). The Implementation of English for Biology Based on CLIL Student Handbook to Improve English Proficiency of Prospective Student Biology Teacher. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 346–349. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2437