Analysis of Elementary and Junior High School Teachers’ Understanding of National Assessment in the Kuningan District
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.2454Published:
2023-05-31Issue:
Vol. 9 No. 5 (2023): MayKeywords:
Evaluation, Literacy, National assessment, NumeracyResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
The Merdeka Belajar policy essentially aims to accelerate the achievement of national goals of education. One of the major changes in the policy is the implementation of the National Assessment (NA) which substitutes national exams and changes the focus of assessment into literacy and numeracy skills. This leads to a demand for teacher to adapt learning process and classroom assessment for facilitating students’ literacy and numeracy skills. Therefore, teacher understanding about the element in national assessment is a very important factor in the implementation of National Assessment. As the response, this study collects data about teacher understanding from 100 elementary and junior high school teachers in the Kuningan Regency area. The results shows that the elementary and junior high school teachers already have a good understanding of the objectives of NA and awareness that the implementation of NA would have an impact on providing a more varied learning and assessment experience. However, it is shown that the good understanding and awareness is not supported by capability to develop literacy and numeracy questions. The support for improving capability in making questions that align with the NA is needed in order to provide appropriate measurement and assessment of student learning outcomes and provide the basis for decision making in the classroom learning process.
References
Ackermans, K., Rusman, E., Nadolski, R., Specht, M., & Brand-Gruwel, S. (2021). Video-enhanced or textual rubrics: Does the Viewbrics’ formative assessment methodology support the mastery of complex (21st century) skills?. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12525
Arikunto, S. (2008). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. PT bumi aksara.
Asad, Mujtaba; Sherwani, Fahad; Hasan, Razali; Churi, P. (2022). Innovative Education Technologies for 21 st Century Teaching and Learning (1St Editi). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003143796
Barbrook-Johnson, P., Proctor, A., Giorgi, S., & Phillipson, J. (2020). How do policy evaluators understand complexity?. Evaluation, 26(3), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389020930053
Barnes, M., & Cross, R. (2020). Teacher education policy to improve teacher quality: Substantive reform or just another hurdle?. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 26(3–4), 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2020.1832061
Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2021). Can a rubric do more than be transparent? Invitation as a new metaphor for assessment criteria. Studies in Higher Education, 46(2), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1637842
Bukit, B., Malusa, T., & Rahmat, A. (2017). Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia: Teori, Dimensi Pengukuran, dan Implementasi dalam Organisasi. Yogyakarta: Zahir Publishing.
Deneen, C. C., Fulmer, G. W., Brown, G. T. L., Tan, K., Leong, W. S., & Tay, H. Y. (2019). Value, practice and proficiency: Teachers’ complex relationship with assessment for learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 80, 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.12.022
Fauziah, A., Fitriani, E., Sobari, D., & Robandi, B. (2021). Analisis Pemahaman Guru Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP) Mengenai Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum (AKM). Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(4), 1550–1558. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i4.608
Hidayah, I., & Kadarwati, S. (2021). Persepsi dan Kesiapan Guru dalam Menghadapi Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum Pendahuluan. CJPE: Cokroaminoto Juornal of Primary Education, 4, 78–83.https://doi.org/10.30605/cjpe.412021.1294
Hindriana, A. F., & Setiawati, I. (2018). the Development of Authentic Asessment Rubric for Assesing Undergraduate Students Learning and Performance. Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.25134/ijli.v1i1.1279
Kemendikbud. (2021). Kebijakan Asesmen Nasional Tahun 2021. Kementerian pendidikan dan kebudayaan, Indonesia.
Kulgemeyer, B., Buschhüter, Enkrott, Kempin, Reinhold, Riese, S., & Vogelsang, J. S. (2020). J Res Sci Teach - 2020 - Kulgemeyer - Professional knowledge affects actionâ€related skills The development of preservice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(10), 154–1582. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/tea.21632
Lestari, N., Mertha, I. W., & Kusmiyati, K. (2019). Profil Assessmen Autentik Pada Guru-Guru Di Smp Negeri Se-Kota Mataram. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v5i1.186
Li, T., Wang, W., Li, Z., Wang, H., & Liu, X. (2022). Problem-based or lecture-based learning, old topic in the new field: a meta-analysis on the effects of PBL teaching method in Chinese standardized residency training. BMC Medical Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03254-5
Meriana, T., Murniarti, E., & Dasar Kanaan, S. (2021). Analisis Pelatihan Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum. Jurnal Dinamika Pendidikan, 14(2), 110–116. Retrieved from http://ejournal.fkipuki.org/index.php/jdp/
Murtiyasa, B., & Perwita, W. R. G. (2020). Analysis of mathematics literation ability of students in completing PISA-oriented mathematics problems with changes and relationships content. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(7), 3160–3172. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080745
Oktaviani, N. M., Wulandari, I., Acesta, A., Ramdhania, R., & Arifin, S. (2021). The Readiness of Elementary School Teachers to Implemented the Independent Learning Policy in Determining Student Graduation in the Kuningan Sub-District. In Proceedings of the 1st Universitas Kuningan International Conference on Social Science, Environment and Technology, 130-140. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.12-12-2020.2305122
Pusmenjar. (2020). Desain Pengembangan Soal AKM. Pembelajaran Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Raselimo, M., & Mahao, M. (2015). The Lesotho curriculum and assessment policy: Opportunities and threats. South African Journal of Education, 35(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.15700/201503070025
Reder, S., Gauly, B., & Lechner, C. (2020). Practice makes perfect: Practice engagement theory and the development of adult literacy and numeracy proficiency. International Review of Education, 66(2–3), 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-020-09830-5
Sakız, H., Ekinci, A., & Sarıçam, H. (2020). Teachers’ perceptions of their school managers’ skills and their own self-efficacy levels. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 23(5), 585–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2018.1562094
Schut, S., Heeneman, S., Bierer, B., Driessen, E., van Tartwijk, J., & van der Vleuten, C. (2020). Between trust and control: Teachers’ assessment conceptualisations within programmatic assessment. Medical Education, 54(6), 528–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14075
Suliyanah, Adelia, B. D., Jauhariyah, M. N. R., Misbah, Mahtari, S., Saregar, A., & Deta, U. A. (2020). A Bibliometric Analysis of Minimum Competency Assessment Research with VOSViewer Related to the Impact in Physics Education on 2019-2020. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2110(1), 012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/17426596/2110/1/012022
Sukmadinata. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. PT Rosdakarya
Tractenberg, R. E. (2021). The assessment evaluation rubric: Promoting learning and learner-centered teaching through assessment in face-to-face or distanced higher education. Education Sciences, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080441
Umi, I., Sri, N., Setyaningsih, R., & Mardhiyana, D. (2021). Minimum Competency Assessment: Designing Tasks to Support Students’ Numeracy. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(14), 3268–3277. Retrieved from https://turcomat.org/index.php/turkbilmat/article/view/10898
Yamtinah, S., Utami, B., Masykuri, M., Mulyani, B., & Syahidul, A. (2022). Secondary School Science Teacher Response to Minimum Competency Assessment: Challenges and Opportunities. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 124-131. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.1075
Author Biographies
Anna Fitri Hindriana, Universitas Kuningan
Asep Jejen Jaelani, Universitas Kuningan
Ina Setiawati, Universitas Kuningan
Isnaini Wulandari, Universitas Kuningan
Rio Priantama, Universitas Kuningan
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Anna Fitri Hindriana, Asep Jejen Jaelani, Ina Setiawati, Isnaini Wulandari, Rio Priantama
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
