Tolerance Some Soybean Cultivars to Stress Drought at Vegetative to Generative Phase
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v8iSpecialIssue.2487Published:
2022-12-12Issue:
Vol. 8 No. SpecialIssue (2022): DecemberKeywords:
Soybean Cultivar, Stres drought, Vegetative to Generative phase, Content prolineReview
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
Soybean is one of crop which many conducting in Jambi province, where this area is one of sentra soybean producer in Indonesia. Main constraint in expansion of soybean in Jambi province is ability of adaptation of low crop to condition of area that is partly are consisted of area of marjinal with level of low fertility , applies strains or cultivar indication by drought tolerance to earn is one of the solutions forplies strains or cultivar indication by drought tolerant to earn is one of alternative of trouble-shooting. Examination of soybean cultivar tolerance to stres drought at vegetative to generative phase (15 - 45 Day After Plants / DAP) done in glasshouse by using Split Plout Design. Treatment of stres drought as main check and soybean cultivar as child of check. From result of observation, treatment of stres dryness at vegetative phase and generative can reduce and pursues growth and result of soybean cultivar tested. But for soybean cultivar Derap-1, Dena-2, Deja-2, Dering-1, Grobogan, Detam-1 and Dega-1, treatment of stres drought exactly causes improvement of root length to range from 7,14 - 60,57%. Based on variable dry weigh seed,seven soybean cultivars tested canot be classified in group of tolerant and tolerant medium to stres drought at vegetative to generative phase that is var. Argo Mulyo, Dena-1, Derap-1, Dena-2, Deja-2, Dering-1, Grobogan dan Detam-1. Stres drought causes improvement can of leaf prthe mechanism of soybean tolerance to stres drought can improve root length as mechanism of tolerance in morphology and or improveprovement of root length as mechanism of tolerance in morphology and or through improvement of proline content as mechanism of tolerance physiologically
References
Anne B. Alerding, Matthew R. Waalkes, Emily S. Hill, Richard A. Rowe & Garrett Parsons. (2018). Stem growth during seed production in soybean: Implications for pod yield, Journal of Crop Improvement, 32:2, 156-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2017.1381866
Abraham, Cecile Hourton-Cabassa, Laszlo Erdei. (2010). Chapter : Methods for Determination of Proline in Plants. Plant Stress Tolerance. Volume 639. pp 317–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-702-0_20
Borges, C.L.T, Pinto. R.J. (2008). Small Hydro Power Plants Energy Availability Modeling for Generation Reliability Evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 23, 1125–1135.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2008.926713
Buezo, J., Sanzâ€Saez, Ã., Moran, J. F., Soba, D., Aranjuelo, I., & Esteban, R. (2019). Drought tolerance response of highâ€yielding soybean varieties to mild drought: physiological and photochemical adjustments. Physiologia plantarum, 166(1), 88-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12864
Chen. M, Xia. L, Xue. P. (2007). “Enzimatic hydrolisis of corncob and ethanol production from cellulosic hydrolisateâ€. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 59 (2): 85-89.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2006.07.011
Dababat AA, Imren M, Erginbas-Orakci G, Ashrafi S, Yavuzaslanoglu E, Toktay H, Pariyar S R, Elekcioglu H I, Morgounov A & Mekete T. (2015). The importance and management strategies of cereal cyst nematodes, Heterodera spp., in Turkey. Euphytica 202(2): 173-188.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10681-014-1269-z
Dogan, E., Kirnak, H., & Copur, O. (2007). Deficit irrigations during soybean reproductive stages and CROPGRO-soybean simulations under semi-arid climatic conditions. Field Crops Research, 103(2), 154-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2007.05.009
Dong, S., Jiang, Y., Dong, Y., Wang, L., Wang, W., Ma, Z., Yan, C., Ma, C., Liu L. (2019). A study on soybean responses to drought stress and rehydration. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 26(8): 2006-2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.sjbs.2019.08.005
Ozturk. M, Unal. BT, GarcÃa-Caparros. P, Khursheed. A, Gul. A, Hasanuzzaman, M. (2021). Osmoregulation and its actions during the drought stress in plants. Physiol Plant. 172(2):1321-1335. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13297
Hapsoh, Yahya. S, Oelim. TMH, Purwoko. BS. (2006). The Physiological Response of Soybean Genotypes to VAM Inoculation on Selected Drought Stress Levels. HAYATI Journal of Biosciences 13(2):43-48. https://doi.org/10.4308/hjb.13.2.43
Singh, G. (2010). Water management in soybean. The Soybean: Botany, Production and Uses. 191-208. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1079/9781845936440.0191
Kavi Kishor. PB, Sangam. S, Amrutha. RN, Laxmi. PS, Naidu. KR, Rao. KRSS, Rao. S, Reddy. KJ, Theriappan. P, and Sreenivasulu. N. (2005). Regulation of proline biosynthesis, degradation, uptake and transport in higher plants: its implications in plant growth and abiotic stress tolerance. Curr Sci 88, 424–438. Retrieved from https://www.currentscience.ac.in/Volumes/88/03/0424.pdf
Kementerian Pertanian. (2021). Produksi tanaman hortikultura di Indonesia tahun 1995-2020. Jakarta.
Manavalan, L. P., Guttikonda, S. K., Phan Tran, L.-S., & Nguyen, H. T. (2009). Physiological and Molecular Approaches to Improve Drought Resistance in Soybean. Plant and cell physiology, 50(7), 1260-1276. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcp082
Patriyawaty. NR, Anggara. GW. (2020). Growth and yield of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merril) genotypes at three levels of drought stress. Jurnal Agromix. Vol 11 No 2: 151-165.
https://doi.org/10.35891/agx.v11i2.2024
Pratiwi P, Kastono D, Indradewa D. (2019). Root Comparison of Five Soybean Cultivars (Glycine max L.) in Drought Condition with Different Measurement Methods. Vegetalika. 2019. 8(4): 276-291. https://doi.org/10.22146/veg.42714
Riduan. A, Aswidinnoor. H, Koswara. J, Sudarsono. (2005). Tolerance of Several Peanut Cultivars against Drought Stress. Hayati 12 (1); 28-34. https://doi.org/10.4308/hjb.12.1.28
Sacita. A. S., June. T, & Impron. (2018). Soybean adaptation to water stress on vegetative and generative phases. Agrotech Journal, 3 (2): 42 – 45. Retrieved from
Saxena, N P and O'Toole, J C (2002). Field screening for drought in crop plants with emphasis on rice. Proceeding of an International Workshop on Field Screening for Drought Tolerance in Rice. ICRISAT. India. Retrieved from
http://oar.icrisat.org/id/eprint/1102
Yanli Du, Zhao. Q, Chen. L, Yao. X, Zhang. W, Zhang. B, Xie. F. (2020). Effect of drought stress on sugar metabolism in leaves and roots of soybean seedlings. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. Volume 146. p 1-12
Author Biographies
Ahmad Riduan, Staf pengajar Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Jambi Jl. Raya Jambi Muara Bulian Km 15 Mendalo Indah, Jambi Kode Pos 36361
Soybean is one of crop which many conducting in Jambi province, where this area is one of sentra soybean producer in Indonesia. Main constraint in expansion of soybean in Jambi province is ability of adaptation of low crop to condition of area that is partly are consisted of area of marjinal with level of low fertility and has water supply internal issue. Plant breeding, especially repair of genetic quality applies strains or cultivar indication by drought tolerant to earn is one of alternative of trouble-shooting.
Examination of soybean cultivar tolerance to stres drought at vegetative to generative phase ( 15 - 45 Day After Plants / DAP) done in glasshouse by using Split Plout Design. Treatment of stres drought as main check and soybean cultivar as child of check. From result of observation, treatment of stres dryness at vegetative phase and generative can reduce and pursues growth and result of soybean cultivar tested. But for soybean cultivar Derap-1, Dena-2, Deja-2, Dering-1, Grobogan, Detam-1 and Dega-1, treatment of stres drought exactly causes improvement of root length to range from 7,14 - 60,57%. Based on variable dry weigh seed, there are seven soybean cultivars tested able to be classified in group of tolerant and tolerant medium to stres drought at vegetative to generative phase that is var. Argo Mulyo, Dena-1, Derap-1, Dena-2, Deja-2, Dering-1, Grobogan dan Detam-1.
Stres drought causes improvement can of leaf proline content at some soybean cultivars tested with different improvement pattern. Therefore mechanism of soybean tolerance to stres drought can through improvement of root length as mechanism of tolerance in morphology and or through improvement of proline content as mechanism of tolerance physiologically.
Rainiyati Rainiyati, Staf pengajar Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Jambi Jl. Raya Jambi Muara Bulian Km 15 Mendalo Indah, Jambi Kode Pos 36361
Yuia Alia, Staf pengajar Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Jambi Jl. Raya Jambi Muara Bulian Km 15 Mendalo Indah, Jambi Kode Pos 36361
Sosiawan Nusifera, Staf pengajar Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Jambi Jl. Raya Jambi Muara Bulian Km 15 Mendalo Indah, Jambi Kode Pos 36361
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ahmad Riduan, Rainiyati Rainiyati, Yuia Alia, Sosiawan Nusifera
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
