Preliminary Study: Profile of Students’ Interpretation Skills on the Topic of Kinematics
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2509Published:
2023-01-31Issue:
Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): JanuaryKeywords:
Graphic Interpretation Ability, Kinematics, Preliminary StudyResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
A graph is a type of representation that is useful in summarizing data, and processing and interpreting new information from complex data. One of the reasons why it is important to understand graphical representation is because graphs can provide quantitative information that is easy to understand. Kinematics is the science of dealing with the movement of an object. Learning can not be separated from pictures and graphics. This study aims to see the initial ability of prospective physics teacher students in interpreting graphs. This mapping is useful for making policy plans for lecturers in planning future physics lessons. This type of research is descriptive research involving 79 respondents. Data collection is done by giving a graph interpretation ability test which consists of 3 indicators, namely graphs interpretation to mathematics, graphs interpretation to descriptions, and graph interpretation to images. From the results of data analysis using descriptive statistics, it was found that the student's ability to interpret graphs was in a low category. This gives information to lecturers that training and strengthening graphic interpretation skills still need to be a concern
References
Anisa, V. N., Tandililing, E., & Mahmuda, D. (2017). Hubungan Kemampuan Siswa Menginterpretasikan Grafik dan Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Soal Gerak Lurus di SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 6(6), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v6i6.20281
Arif, S., & Muthoharoh, A. N. (2021). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Powtoon dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi IPA di Tengah Pandemi Covid 19. Jurnal IPA Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 5(1), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v5i1.19779
Bollen, L., Kampen, P., Baily, C., Kelly, M., & Cock, M. (2017). Student difficulties regarding symbolic and graphical representations of vector fields. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020109
Bunawan, W., Setiawan, A., Rusli, A., & Nahadi. (2015). Penilaian Pemahaman Representasi Grafik Materi Optika Geometri Menggunakan Tes Diagnostik. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 2(2), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v2i2.4830
Chua, Y. P. (2006). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan, Asas Statistik Penyelidikan.Buku 2. McGraw-Hill Sdn. Bhd. Malaysia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277009907_Kaedah_dan_Statistik_Penyelidikan_Kaedah_Penyelidikan
Ergül, N. R. (2018). Pre-service science teachers’ construction and interpretation of graphs. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(1), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060113
Ghozali, I. (2009). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS “. UNDIP. https://adoc.pub/ghozali-imam-2009-aplikasi-analisis-multivariate-dengan-prog.html
Glazer, N. (2011). Challenges with graph interpretation: A review of the literature. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 183–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.605307
Hasibuan, A. T., & Prastowo, A. (2019). Konsep Pendidikan Abad 21: Kepemimpinan Dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia SD/MI. MAGISTRA: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar Dan Keislaman, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.31942/mgs.v10i1.2714
Jackson, S., & L. (2012). Research Methode and Statistics; A Critical Thinking Approach (4th ed.). Wardsworth Cengange Learning. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Research_Methods_and_Statistics_A_Critic.html?id=rTZ-BAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Masgumelar, N. K., & Mustafa, P. S. (2021). Teori Belajar Konstruktivisme: Implementasi dan Implikasinya dalam Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran. GHAITSA : Islamic Education, 2(1), 49–57. http://liyarizkifadillah1997.blogspot.com/2019/01/teori-belajar-konstruktivisme.html
Mole, P. N., Hau, R. R. H., & Elizabeth, A. (2022). Multi Representation Ability of Students in Solving Physics Problems on Straight Motion. Variabel, 5(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.26737/var.v5i1.2592
Murniati, R., Tandililing, E., & Hidayatullah, M. M. S. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Multi Representasi Peserta Didik Pada Materi Usaha Di Madrasah Aliyah. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 2(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.26418/jippf.v2i1.43883
Ningrum, A. S., Susanto, H., & Mindyarto, B. N. (2018). Pengembangan media charta Free Body Diagram (FBD) yang moveable untuk meningkatkan kemampuan multirepresentasi siswa pada materi kesetimbangan dan dinamika rotasi. UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal, 7(3), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.15294/upej.v7i3.27675
Nurdyansyah, N., & Fahyuni, E. F. (2016). Inovasi model pembelajaran sesuai kurikulum 2013. Nizamia Learning Center.
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education, PISA. In OECD Publishing: Paris: Vol. I. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-5-en
Rivaldo, L., Taqwa, M. R. A., Aini, F. N., Shodiqin, M. I., & Saputri, D. E. (2018). Kemampuan Menginterpretasi Grafik dalam Topik Kinematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pembelajaran IPA Ke, 3(May 2019), 6–9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333114481_Kemampuan_Mengintepretasi_Grafik_dalam_Topik_Kinematika
Rosnaeni, R. (2021). Karakteristik dan Asesmen Pembelajaran Abad 21. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(5), 4341–4350. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i5.1548
Sitinjak JR, T., & Sugiarto. (2006). LISREL. Graha Ilmu. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=706387
Sugrah, N. U. (2020). Implementasi teori belajar konstruktivisme dalam pembelajaran sains. Humanika, 19(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v19i2.29274
Sunarti, T. (2022). Research Analysis on Multi Representation in Physical Materials in The Year of 2014 to 2021. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 3(3), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v3i3.218
Suparlan, S. (2019). Teori Konstruktivisme dalam Pembelajaran. Islamika, 1(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.36088/islamika.v1i2.208
Yustiandi, & Saepuzaman, D. (2017). Profil Kemampuan Interpretasi Grafik Kinematika Siswa Sma Kelas X. Gravity: Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Fisika GRAVITY, 3(1), 30–39. http://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/Gravity
Author Biographies
Yennita Yennita, Riau University
Zulirfan Zulirfan, Riau University
Mitri Irianti, Riau University
M Idris Tukan, Riau University
Talia Ananda, Riau University
Khoirul Ahlun Naza, Riau University
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Y Yennita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
