Systematic Literature Review: Multiple-tier Diagnostic Instruments in Measuring Student Chemistry Misconceptions

Authors

Muthmainnah Damsi , Slamet Suyanto

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.2600

Published:

2023-05-31

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 5 (2023): May

Keywords:

Misconception, Systematic literature review, Multiple-tier diagnostic instruments

Review

Downloads

How to Cite

Damsi, M., & Suyanto, S. . (2023). Systematic Literature Review: Multiple-tier Diagnostic Instruments in Measuring Student Chemistry Misconceptions. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.2600
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Misconception is a conception of someone who is not by scientific concepts recognized by experts. One way to identify students' misconceptions is by conducting tests using diagnostic instruments. This study aims to identify misconceptions in chemistry learning as well as the most widely used types of multiple-tier diagnostic instruments. The research method used is a systematic literature review (SLR) by analyzing relevant research results from the Google Scholar and ERIC databases of 47 articles based on their suitability with the research theme within the last seven years (2016-2022). The systematic literature review method reviews articles systematically by following the steps that have been determined. The research findings show that students' misconceptions mostly occur in the buffer solution material with the most widely used diagnostic instrument, namely the three-tier multiple-choice (50%). The dominant cause of students' chemical misconceptions occurs due to students' internal factors in the form of a mismatch between students' preconceptions and the concepts taught by experts and strategies for applying learning models that are often used as a method to reduce students' chemical misconceptions such as the application of the Dual Situated Learning Model (DSLM) as well as implementing the Elicit, Confront, Identify, Resolve, Reinforce (ECIRR) model.

References

Ade Monita, F., & Suharto, D. B. (2016). Identifikasi dan analisisi miskonsepsi siswa menggunakan three-tier multiplechoice diagnostic instrumen pada konsep kesetimbangan kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains, 7(1), 27–38. Retrieved from https:// https://ppjp.ulm.ac.id/journal/index.php/quantum/article/view/3538/3067

Akbar, Z. D., Herdini, H., & Abdullah, A. (2019). Identifikasi miskonsepsi materi kesetimbangan kimia menggunakan tes diagnostik pilihan ganda tiga tingkat (three-tier multiple choice) pada peserta didik kelas XI MIA SMA Negeri 2 Pekanbaru. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Universitas Riau, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.33578/jpk-unri.v4i1.7082

Andrianie, D., Sudarmin, & Wardani, S. (2018). Representasi kimia untuk mereduksi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi redoks melalui penerapan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing berbantuan LKS. Chemistry in Education, 7(2), 69–76. Retrieved from http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/chemined

Antari, W. D., Sumarni, W., Harjito, & Basuki, J. (2020). Model instrumen test diagnostik two tiers choice untuk analisis miskonsepsi materi larutan penyangga. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 14(1), 2536–2546. https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v14i1.15882

Anugrah, I. R. (2019). Telaah topik stoikiometri sma: miskonsepsi dan strategi pembelajarannya. Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.19109/ojpk.v3i2.4892

Apriadi, N. N. S., Redhana, I. W., & Suardana, I. N. (2019). Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa kelas X pada topik reaksi redoks. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 2(2), 70. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v2i2.16617

Ardiansah, M. M., & Rahardjo, S. B. (2017). Kelayakan instrumen diagnostik pada materi asam-basa dan kesetimbangan kelarutan. Prosiding SNPS (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains), 21, 104–111. Retrieved from https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/snps/article/view/11399/8084

Arsyad, M., Sihaloho, M., & Kilo, A. La. (2016). Analisis miskonsepsi pada konsep hidrolisis garam siswa kelas XI SMAN 1 Telaga. Jurnal Entropi Inovasi Penelitian, Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Sains, 11(2), 190–195. Retrieved from https://repository.ung.ac.id/skripsi/show/441411022/analisis-miskonsepsi-pada-konsep-hidrolisis-garam-siswa-kelas-xi-sman-1-telaga.html

Ayu, L. E., Susilaningsih, E., & Nanik WIjayati, dan. (2021). Analisis miskonsepsi menggunakan tes diagnosa three-tier multiple choice pada materi stoikiometri. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia 15(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v15i2.29171

Damayanti, K., Susilogati, S., & Kadarwati, S. (2021). Analisis miskonsepsi peserta didik pada materi hidrolisis garam dalam pembelajaran dengan model guided inquiry. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 15(1), 2731–2744. https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v15i1.22534

Ebiati, E., Asrial, A., & Effendi-Hasibuan, M. H. (2020). Sensitivity of two-tier and three-tier tests in detecting student’s misconceptions of chemical bonding. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 12(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v12i2.19405

Fitria, P, S., & Kasmui. (2016). Penggunaan multimedia interaktif dalam meminimalisasi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi pokok larutan penyangga. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 10(1), 1641–1650. https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v10i1.6010

Gazali, F., & Yusmaita, E. (2018). Analisis prior knowledge konsep asam basa siswa kelas xi sma untuk merancang modul kimia berbasis REACT. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (JEP), 2(2), 202. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol2-iss2/249

Gultom, M., Fitriyani, D., Paristiowati, M., Moersilah, Yusmaniar, & Rahmawati, Y. (2019). Analisis miskonsepsi pada materi larutan penyangga menggunakan two-tier diagnostic test. JRPK: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia, 9(2), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpk.092.01

Handayani, L. (2020). Peningkatan motivasi belajar ipa melalui model pembelajaran project based learning pada masa pandemi covid-19 bagi siswa SMP Negeri 4 Gunungsari. Jurnal Paedagogy, 7(3), 168. https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v7i3.2726

Hidayah, U. L., Supardi, K. I., & Sumarni, W. (2018). Penggunaan instrumen lembar wawancara pendukung tes diagnostik pendeteksi miskonsepsi untuk analisis pemahaman konsep buffer-hidrolisis. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 12(1), 2075–2085. https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v12i1.13299

Jannah, M., Ningsih, P., & Ratman, R. (2017). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Banawa tengah pada pembelajaran larutan penyangga dengan CRI (Certainty of Response Index). Jurnal Akademika Kimia, 5(2), 85. https://doi.org/10.22487/j24775185.2016.v5.i2.8019

Jusniar, J., Effendy, E., Budiasih, E., & Sutrisno, S. (2020a). Eliminating misconceptions on reaction rate to enhance conceptual understanding of chemical equilibrium using EMBE-R strategy. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.29333/IJI.2021.1416A

Jusniar, J., Effendy, E., Budiasih, E., & Sutrisno, S. (2020b). Misconceptions in rate of reaction and their impact on misconceptions in chemical equilibrium. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1405–1423. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1405

Karim, F., Ischak, N. I., Mohamad, E., & Aman, L. O. (2022). Identifikasi miskonsepsi ikatan kimia menggunakan diagnostic test multiple choice berbantuan certainty of response index. Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry, 4(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.34312/jjec.v4i1.13239

Khairunnisa, K., & Prodjosantoso, A. (2020). Analysis of students misconception in chemical equilibrium material using three tier test. JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya), 5(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v5i1.7661

Khomaria, I. N., & Nasrudin, H. (2016). Penerapan model pembelajaran ecirr untuk mereduksi miskonsepsi pada materi kesetimbangan kimia kelas XI MIA di SMA Negeri 1 Pacet. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, 5(1), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.26740/ujced.v5n1.p%25p

Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele: Software Engineering Group Department of Computer Science Keele University Keele.

Kustiarini, F. T., Susanti VH, E., & Saputro, A. N. C. (2019). Penggunaan tes diagnostik three-tier test alasan terbuka untuk mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi larutan. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 8(2), 171. https://doi.org/10.20961/jpkim.v8i2.25236

Lestari, E. A., Harjito, H., Susilaningsih, E., & Wijayati, N. (2021). Analisis miskonsepsi menggunakan tes diagnosa three-tier multiple choice pada materi stoikiometri. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 15(2), 2824–2830. https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v15i2.29171

Lestari, L. A., Subandi, S., & Habiddin, H. (2021). Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi laju reaksi dan perbaikannya menggunakan model pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E dengan strategi konflik kognitif. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 6(6), 888. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v6i6.14876

M. Maison., N. Lestari., A. Widaningtyas. Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi usaha dan energi. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA. 6(1), 32-39. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v6i1.314

Maksum, M. J., Sihaloho, M., & La Kilo, A. (2017). Analisis kemampuan pemahaman siswa pada konsep larutan penyangga menggunakan three tier multiple choice tes. Jurnal Entropi, 12(1), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.34312/jjec

Maratusholihah, N. F., Rahayu, S., & Fajaroh, F. (2017). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa SMA pada materi hidrolisis garam dan larutan penyangga. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 2(7), 919–926. Retrieved from http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/

Mapada, S., Roro Ariessanty Alicia Kusuma Wardhani, R., Khairunnisa, Y., & Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari, U. (2022). Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa kelas XI IPA pada materi larutan penyangga menggunakan two-tier diagnostic instrument di SMA Sabilal Muhtadin Banjarmasin. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia dan Ilmu Kimia, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.31602/dl.v5i1.7520

Maulidiyah, F., Widarti, H. R., & Utomo, Y. (2021). Analisis kesalahan konsep mahasiswa kimia pada kajian pokok hidrolisis garam menggunakan tes pilihan ganda empat tingkat. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 6(7), 1044. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v6i7.14921

Monoarfa, Z., Kilo, A. La, & Botutihe, D. N. (2017). Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa kelas XI IPA 1 di SMA Negeri 3 Gorontalo Utara pada konsep larutan penyangga. Jurnal Entropi, 12(2), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.34312/jjec

Mubarokah, F. D., Mulyani, S., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2018). Identifying students’ misconceptions of acid-base concepts using a three-tier diagnostic test: A case of Indonesia and Thailand. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(Special Issue), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10256a

Muderawan, I. W., Wiratma, I. G. L., & Nabila, M. Z. (2019). Analisis faktor-faktor penyebab kesulitan belajar pada bidang studi akuntansi. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 3(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v3i1.20944

Mukhlisa, N. (2021). Miskonsepsi pada peserta didik. SPEED Journal : Journal of Special Education, 4(2), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.31537/speed.v4i2.403

Nahadi, N., Siswaningsih, W., & Kurnia M, H. (2020). Misconception profile of high school student on electrolyte and non-electrolyte solution using pictorial-based two-tier multiple choices diagnostic test. JKPK (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan Kimia), 5(3), 264. https://doi.org/10.20961/jkpk.v5i3.46739

Ni’mah, M., Subandi, S., & Munzil, M. (2020b). Keefektifan pembelajaran pogil dengan strategi konflik kognitif untuk mengurangi miskonsepsi pada materi laju reaksi kelas XI SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 5(9), 1257. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i9.14010

Noprianti, E., & Utami, L. (2017). Penggunaan two-tier multiple choice diagnostic test disertai cri untuk menganalisis miskonsepsi siswa. JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya), 2(2), 124–129. https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v2i2.1876

Noviani, M. W., & Istiyadji, M. (2017). Miskonsepsi ditinjau dari penguasaan pengetahuan prasyarat untuk materi ikatan kimia pada kelas X. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains, 8(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/quantum.v8i1.3860

Nurhidayatulah, N., & Prodjosantoso, A. K. (2018). Miskonsepsi materi larutan penyangga. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 4(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v4i1.10029

Nurhujaimah, R., Kartika, I. R., & Nurjaydi, M. (2016). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa kelas XI SMA pada materi larutan penyangga menggunakan instrumen tes three tier multiple choice. Jurnal Paedagogia, 19(1), 15–28. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/paedagogia/article/view/36090

Nurulwati, N., & Rahmadani, A. (2020). Perbandingan hasil diagnostik miskonsepsi menggunakan threetier dan fourtier diagnostic test pada materi gerak lurus. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 7(2), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v7i2.14436

Permatasari, M. B., Muchson, M., Hakimah, N., Rokhim, D. A., Herunata, H., & Yahmin, M. (2022). Identifikasi miskonsepsi materi kesetimbangan kimia pada siswa sma menggunakan tes three tier berbasis web. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 16(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v16i1.29407

Prianti, T., Susanti VH, E., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2020). Misconceptions of High School Students in salt hydrolysis topic using a three-tier diagnostic test (TTDT). JKPK (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan Kimia), 5(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.20961/jkpk.v5i1.34502

Priliyanti, A., Muderawan, I. W., & Maryam, S. (2021). Analisis kesulitan belajar siswa dalam mempelajari kimia kelas XI. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Undiksha, 5(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpk.v5i1.32402

Prodjosantoso, A. K., Hertina, A. M., & Irwanto. (2019). The misconception diagnosis on ionic and covalent bonds concepts with three-tier diagnostic test. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1477–1488. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12194a

Qadri, R. A. Al, Alhaq, P. M., Muthmainnah, N., Irpadilla, M. A., Herlina, Aulia, N., & Scholten, A. R. (2019). Analisis miskonsepsi peserta didik kelas XI SMAN 1 Gowa pada materi larutan penyangga menggunakan instrumen three tier diagnostic test. Jurnal Nalar Pendidikan, 7(1), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.26858/jnp.v7i1.9388

Qodriyah, N. R. L., Rokhim, D. A., Widarti, H. R., & Habiddin. (2020). Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa kelas XI SMA Negeri 4 Malang pada materi hidrokarbon menggunakan instrumen diagnostik three tier. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 14(2), 2642–2651. https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v14i2.24293

Sariati, N. K., Suardana, I. N., & Wiratini, N. M. (2020). Analisis kesulitan belajar kimia siswa kelas XI pada materi larutan penyangga. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan & Pembelajaran, 4(1), 86–97. Retrieved from https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JIPP/article/view/15469

Setiawan, D., Cahyono, E., & Kurniawan, C. (2017). Identifikasi dan analisis miskonsepsi pada materi ikatan kimia menggunakan instrumen tes diagnostik three-tier. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 6(2), 197–204. Retrieved from http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jise

Sihaloho, M., Hadis, S. S., Kilo, A. K., & Kilo, A. La. (2021). Diagnosa miskonsepsi siswa sma negeri 1 telaga gorontalo pada materi termokimia. Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.34312/jjec.v3i1.7133

Siswanto. (2010). Systematic review sebagai metode penelitian untuk mensintasis hasil-hasil penelitian (sebuah pengantar) (systematic review as a research method to synthesize research results (an introduction). Buletin Penelitian Sistem Kesehatan, 13(4), 326–333. https://doi.org/10.22435/bpsk.v13i4 Okt.2766

Wahab, M., Isa, I., & Laliyo, L. A. R. (2022). Analisis miskonsepsi larutan penyangga dengan tes pilihan ganda empat tingkat pada siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains, 13(1), 118–130. http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/quantum.v13i1.12263

Wahyuningtyas, W., Sumarti, S. S., Susilaningsih, E., & Wijayati, N. (2020). Analisis miskonsepsi asam basa menggunakan instrumen diagnostic test terintegrasi multirepresentasi berbasis web. Chemistry in Education, 9(1), 84–90. Retrieved from http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/chemined

Warsito, J., Subandi, S., & Parlan, P. (2021). Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa pada topik ikatan kimia serta perbaikannya dengan pembelajaran model ECIRR (elicit, confront, identify, resolve, reinforce). Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 5(11), 1563. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i11.14158

Wati, W., & Novita, D. (2021). Mereduksi miskonsepsi materi kesetimbangan kimia melalui penerapan strategi predict discuss explain observe discuss explain (PDEODE). Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Undiksha, 5, 1–10. Retrieved from https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPK

Wutsqo Amry, U., Rahayu, S., & Yahmin. (2017). Analisis miskonsepsi asam basa pada pembelajaran konvensional dan dual situated learning model (DSLM). Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 2(3), 385–391. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/article/view/8636

Zakiyah, Ibnu, S., & Subandi. (2018). Analisis dampak kesulitan siswa pada materi stoikiometri terhadap hasil belajar termokimia. EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan), 3(1), 119–134. http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/educhemia.v3i1.1784

Author Biographies

Muthmainnah Damsi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Slamet Suyanto, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Muthmainnah Damsi, Slamet Suyanto

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).