Vol. 9 No. 4 (2023): April
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

Development of Student Worksheets (LKPD) to Measure Student Creativity

Authors

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i4.2674

Published:

2023-04-30

Downloads

Abstract

This research is a development research which aims to develop valid project based learning worksheets, practical project based learning worksheets, effective project based learning worksheets for measuring creativity. The subjects of this research trial were 32 students of class XI MIPA 2 SMAN 3 Polewali. This study uses the development of a 4-D model. The instruments used in this study were LKPD validation sheets, practitioner response questionnaires (educators/teachers), creativity test instruments and non-creativity test instruments (cognitive dimension creativity assessment sheets, affective dimension creativity questionnaires, psychomotor dimension creativity assessment sheets). LKPD eligibility criteria seen from the aspect of validity. The practicality criteria are seen from practitioners' assessment of LKPD, and the effectiveness criteria are seen from the level of creativity of students after being given project-based learning LKPD. Based on the results of the analysis, it was concluded that the developed project based learning LKPD, based on expert judgment using Aiken V index analysis, obtained a V value of 0.77 meaning that the LKPD was declared valid and feasible to use with minor revisions, then the project based learning based LKPD in terms of response physics teacher practitioners obtained an average score of 3.5 meaning that the LKPD is in the very good category and the effectiveness of project based learning LKPD is seen from the results of the analysis of student creativity, after being analyzed it is found that the average percentage of students' creativity scores on the cognitive dimension is 78.22%, the average percentage of creativity in the affective dimension is 79.25%, and the average percentage of creativity in the psychomotor dimension is 77.50% so that it can be said that the project based learning worksheets developed are effective for measuring student creativity because they have the average creativity score is above 75%.

Keywords:

Creativity Model 4-D Project based learning Student worksheets

References

Abidin, Y. (2014). Desain Sistem Pembelajaran Dalam Konteks Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.

Afriana, J., Permanasari, A., & Fitriani, A. (2016). Project based learning integrated to stem to enhance elementary school’s students scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 261–267. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i2.5493

Amalia, T., & Purwanto, J. (2017). Pengaruh Model Project Based Learning Berbasis Integrasi-Interkoneksi terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor. COMPTON: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 4(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.30738/cjipf.v4i2.3084

Anjarwati, P. G. P., Sajidan, S., & Prayitno, B. A. (2018). Problem-Based Learning Module of Environmental Changes to Enhance Students’ Creative Thinking Skill. Biosaintifika: Journal of Biology & Biology Education, 10(2), 313–319. https://doi.org/10.15294/biosaintifika.v10i2.12598

Astuti, D. R., Saputro, S., & Mulyani, S. (2016). Pengembangan Modul Kimia Berbasis Scientific Approach Pada Materi Ikatan Kimia Kelas X SMA/MA Semester 1. Jurnal Inkuiri, 5(2), 71–78. Retrieved from https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/inkuiri/article/view/9664

Bell, S. (2010). Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415

Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, J. R. (2013). STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach (second). Sense.

Christensen, C. (2011). The innovator’s DNA: matering the five skills of disruptive innovators. USA. Harvard Business School.

Dong, Y., Lin, J., Li, H., Cheng, L., Niu, W., & Tong, Z. (2022). How parenting styles affect children’s creativity: Through the lens of self. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45, 101045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101045

Gunawan, G., Sahidu, H., Harjono, A., & Suranti, N. M. Y. (2017). The Effect of Project Based Learning With Virtual Media Assistance on Student’s Creativity in Physics. Jurnal Cakrawal Pendidikan, 36(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v36i2.13514

Morney, E. (2022). Creative prerequisites for innovation in group collaboration A case study of slow-TV, the genesis of a Norwegian television genre. Journal of Creativity, 32(3), 100031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2022.100031

Nugraheni, D. (2018). Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek (Project Based Learning) Materi Kalor dan Perpindahannya untuk Meningkatkan Kreativitas Siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 9(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v9i2.2798

Rochmad, R. (2012). Desain Model Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 3(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v3i1.2613

Sambada, D. (2012). Peranan Kreativitas Siswa Terhadap Kemampuan Memecahkan Masalah Fisika Dalam Pembelajaran Kontekstual. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 2(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v2n2.p37-47

Santyasa, I. W., Rapi, N. K., & Sara, I. W. W. (2020). Project Based Learning and Academic Procrastination of Students in Learning Physics. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13132a

Song, Y. (2018). Improving primary students’ collaborative problem solving competency in projectbased science learning with productive failure instructional design in a seamless learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(4), 979–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9600-3

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. PT Alfabeta. Sukaridhoto.

Sunarto, S. (2018). Pengembangan Kreativitas-Inovatif Dalam Pendidikan Seni Melalui Pembelajaran Mukidi. Refleksi Edukatika: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.24176/re.v8i2.2348

Syefrinando, B., Sukarno, Ariawijaya, M., & Nasukha, A. (2022). the Effect of Digital Literacy Capabilities and Self-Regulation on the Student’S Creativity in Online Physics Teaching. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(3), 489–499. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i3.31811

Trianto. (2018). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu Sequenced. Bumi Aksara.

Trianto, I. B. (2014). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif, Progresif, dan Kontekstual. Prenadamedia Group.

Wahyudi, A. T. (2016). Pengembangan LKPD Berbasis Project Based Learning Guna Melihat Kreativitas Peserta Didik pada Materi Mengoperasikan Softwere Proteus Kelas X Teknik Audio Video di SMK Muhammadiyah 3 Yogyakarta. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Wahyuni, A. (2013). Pengembangan Kreativitas Guru Sebagai Modal Penerapan Kurikulum 2013. Proseding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan : Guru Kreatif Kunci Sukses Pendidikan Berkemajuan, December. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-012-2902-1

Widiarini, P., Pramadi, I. P. W. Y., & Mardana, I. B. P. (2021). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Berbantu Lab Virtual Terhadap Kreativitas Mahasiswa. Orbita, 7(1), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.31764/orbita.v7i1.4649

Wurdinger, S., & Qureshi, M. (2015). Enhancing college students’ life skills through project based learning. Innovative Higher Education, 40(3), 279– 286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-014-9314-3

Yulianti, E. (2014). Pengembangan Lembar Kerjas Siswa (LKS) Berbasis Project Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kreativitas Sains dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Materi Pokok Fluida di SMA Negeri 1 Sleman. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Author Biographies

Ummi Chalsum, UmmiChalsum

Author Origin : Indonesia

Muhammad Arsyad, Makassar State University

Author Origin : Indonesia

Helmi Helmi, Makassar State University

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Chalsum, U. ., Arsyad, M. ., & Helmi, H. (2023). Development of Student Worksheets (LKPD) to Measure Student Creativity. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(4), 1861–1867. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i4.2674