Analysis of Validation of Instruments to Measure Student’s Critical Thinking Ability and Science Literation

Autor(s): Tomi Widiatmo, A Wahab Jufri, Jamaluddin Jamaluddin
DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v5i2.272

Abstract

Abstrak: This study aims to produce a valid and reliable instrument to measure the influence of guided inquiry learning models on students' critical thinking skills and scientific literacy through assignment techniques. The instruments of this study are a syllabus, learning implementation plan (RPP), questions of critical thinking and scientific literacy. An analysis of validity is carried out by proving the content and criteria validity. The results of the analysis of validity, reliability, level of difficulty, and differentiation indicate that the instrument has met the criteria that are feasible and valid for measuring students' critical thinking and literacy skills.

Keywords: Validity; Research Instruments; Critical Thinking; Science Literacy; Guided Inquiry.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anwar, H. 2015. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran IPA Model 5e dan Analisis Implikasinya terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik di SMP Negeri 2 Kopang. Tesis. Universitas Mataram.

Bilgin, I. 2009. The effects of guided inquiry instruction incorporating a cooperative learning approach on university students’ achievement of acid and bases concepts and attitude toward guided inquiry instruction. Scientific Research and Essay 4(10): 1038- 1046.

Ennis, R. H. 1985. A Logical basic for Measuring Critical Thinking skills. Educational Leadership, 43 (2): 44-48.

Firman, H. 2007. Laporan Analisis Literasi Sains Berdasarkan Hasil PISA Nasional. Jakarta: Puspendik.

Hanson, D. M. 2012. Designing Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Activities. Diakses dari http://quarknet.fnal.gov/fellows/TLDownloads/Designing_POGIL_Activities.pdf

Kemendikbud. 2013. Pedoman Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Martondang, Z. 2009. Pengantar Evaluasi. Medan: PPS Unimed.

OECD. 2016. PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic and Financial Literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Puspendik. 2018. Capaian Nilai Ujian Nasional Provinsi NTB Tahun 2017/2018. Diakses dari puspendik.kemendikbud.go.id

Retnawati, H. 2016. Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian (Panduan Peneliti, Mahasiswa, dan Psikometrian). Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.

Setiadi, D., 2013. Pengembangan Model pembelajaran Pembelajaran Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik SMP. Disertasi. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Sugiyono. 2018. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Susetyo, B. 2015. Prosedur Penyusunan & Analisis Tes: Untuk Penilaian Hasil Belajar Bidang Kognitif. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Udi, E. A., & Cheng, D. 2015. Developing Critical Thinking Skills from Dispositions to Abilities: Mathematics Education from Early Childhood to High School. Creative Education, 6: 455-462.

Wiersma, W. 1986. Research methods in education: an introduction. Massachussets: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.

Zohar, A., & Dori, Y.J. 2003. Higher Order Thinking Skills and Low Achieving Students: Are They Mutually Exclusive?. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12: 145-181.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v5i2.272

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.