Development of Electronic Worksheet Guided Inquiry to Reduce Misconceptions and Improve High School Students' Concept Mastery on Straight Motion Material

Authors

M. Ibnusaputra , Insih Wilujeng , Heru Kuswanto

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.2738

Published:

2023-05-31

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 5 (2023): May

Keywords:

Electronic worksheet guided inquiry, Straight Motion, Misconception, Mastery of Concept

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Ibnusaputra, M. ., Wilujeng, I. ., & Kuswanto, H. . (2023). Development of Electronic Worksheet Guided Inquiry to Reduce Misconceptions and Improve High School Students’ Concept Mastery on Straight Motion Material. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 2653–2663. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.2738

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This study aims to develop guided inquiry electronic worksheets that are suitable for use. Another objective is to determine the level of effectiveness of guided inquiry electronic worksheet products in reducing misconceptions and improving the mastering physics concepts in straight motion material. This Research and Development (R&D) research adapts the stages of development research from Borg and Gall. The research was conducted at SMAN 1 Gerung, West Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara. A total of 60 students in class XI MIPA for empirical trials of test instruments, and 94 students in class X MIPA for extensive trials. The data analysis technique uses 1 way ANOVA with advanced testing using partial ETA square for analyzing concept mastery, while misconceptions use Certainty Response Index (CRI) analysis. The results of expert validation on guided inquiry student worksheet development products, and supporting products in the form of lesson plans and conceptual mastery skills test instruments are included in the category of proper use and very valid. The empirical test results of the test instrument have also been categorized as valid. The application of guided inquiry electronic worksheet products based on CRI analysis effectively reduces misconceptions by 42.31%. Based on the results of the 1st ANOVA inferential statistical analysis, it was significant at 0.039, indicating that there were differences in concept mastery between students who applied guided inquiry worksheets and students in the control class. Further test results with partial ETA square also show the effectiveness of the product in the form of influence on concept mastery with a significant 0.039, which is a moderate leve

References

Aji, S. D., Bernadino, A., & Hudha, N. M. (2017). Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Pendekatan Saintifik (Scientific Approach) untuk Meningkatkan Berpikir Kritis. Jurnal Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 1(2): 140-147. http://ejournal.unikama.ac.id/index.php/momentum/index

Barniol, P., & Zavala, G. (2016). A tutorial worksheet to help students develop the ability to interpret the dot product as a projection. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9): 2387–2398. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1271a

Borg, W. R. & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational Research: An Introduction, Fifth Edition. New York: Longman.

Busyairi, A., & Zuhdi, M. (2020). Profil Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Calon Guru Fisika Ditinjau Dari Berbagai Representasi Pada Materi Gerak Lurus Dan Gerak Parabola. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 6(1): 90–98. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v6i1.1683

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences; Second Edition. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Daesang, K., Dong-Joong K., &Woo-Hyung W. (2013). Cognitive Synergy in Multimedia Learning. International Education Studies, 6(4): 76-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n4p76

Firma, Y. K., Agustinigsih, A., & Aguk, A. W. (2021). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Elektronik (E-LKPD) Berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS). Jurnal Edustream: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 5(2): 143-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.22032/jpd.v3a1.5537

Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & Mcdermott, L. C. (2015). A Review And Comparison Of Diagnostic Instruments To Identify Students’ Misconceptions In Science. Eurasia Journal Of Mathematics, Science And Technology Education, 11(5): 989–1008. https://doi.Org/10.12973/Eurasia.2015.1369a

Habibbulloh, M., Jatmiko, B., & Widodo, W. (2017). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Model Guided Discovery Berbasis Lab Virtual untuk Mereduksi Miskonsepsi Siswa SMK Topik Efek Fotolistrik. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya, 7(1): 27-42. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v7n1.p27-43

Herliandry, L. D., & Harjono, A. (2019). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Fisika Peserta Didik Kelas X Dengan Model Brain Based Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 5(1): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v5i1.166

Hidayatullah, Z. (2021). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis CCM Bermuatan Konflik Kognitif untuk Mereduksi Miskonsepsi dan Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Kadir, K. (2018). Statistika Terapan: Konsep, Contoh, dan Analisis Data dengan Program SPSS/Lisrel dalam Penelitian. Depok: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Laliyo, L. A. R., Botutihe, D. N., & Panirogo, C. (2019). The Development of Two-Tier Instrument Based on Difractor to Asses Conceptual Understanding Level and Student Misconceptions in Explaining Redox Reactions. International Journal of Learning, Teaching, and Educational Research, 18(9), 216-237. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.9.12

Masson, S., Potvin, P., Riopel, M., & Foisy, L (2014). Differences in Brain Activation Between Novices and Expert in Sciences During a Task Involving a Common Misconception in Electricity. International Mind, Brain, and Education Society and Wiley Periodical, 8(1): 44-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12043

Nana, N. (2020). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuri Terbimbing untuk Mereduksi Miskonsepsi pada Konsep Gerak Lurus Siswa SMA Kelas X. Jurnal DIFFRACTION: Journal for Physics Education and Applied Physics, 2(1): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.37058/diffraction.v2i1.1799

Neidorf, T., Arora, A., Erberber, E., Tsokodayi, Y., & Mai, T. (2020). Student Misconceptions and Errors in Physics and Mathematics. Switzerland: Springer Nature.

Pramudyawan, M. T. S., Doyan, A., &ʻArdhuha, J. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbantuan Kit Alat Percobaan Usaha dan Energi terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Fisika Peserta Didik. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 6(1): 40-44. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v6i1.290

Rettob, J., Poluakan, C., Tulandi, D.A., Mongan, S. W., and Polii, J. (2020). Students Learning Difficulties In Understanding The Lorentz Force. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021(012041). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1968/1/012041

Rosdianto, H., Murdani, E., & Hendra, H. (2017). The Implementation of POE (Predict Observe Explain) Model to Improve Student's Concept Understanding on Newton's Law. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Unimed, 6(1): 55-57. https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/jpf/article/view/6899/5924

Sahara, L., Fayanto, S., Nafarudin, N., & Tairjanovna, B. A. (2020). Analysis of Improving Students' Physics Conceptual Understanding through Discovery Learning Models Supported by Multi-representation: Measurement Topic. journal Indonesian Review of Physics, 3(2): 57-65. https://doi.org/10.12928/irip.v3i2.3064

Silviani, R., Muliyani, R., & Kurniawan, Y. (2017). Penerapan Three Tier-Test untuk Mengidentifikasi Kuantitas Siswa yang Miskonsepsi Pada Materi Magnet. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan fisika, 2(1): 10-11. https://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v2i1.197

Sugiyono, S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Uzun, S., Alev, N., & Karal, I. S. (2013). A Cross-Age Study of sn Understanding of Light and Sight Concepts in Physics. Science Education International,24(2):129-149. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1015829.pdf.

Volfson, A., Eshach, H., & Ben, Y. A. (2019). Identifying physics misconceptions at the circus: The case of circular motion. Jurnal Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1): 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010134

Yuliani, H., Mariati, M., Yulianti, R., & Herianto, C. (2017). Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Di Palangka Raya Menggunakan Pendekatan Saintifik. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Keilmuan (JPFK). 3(1), 48-56. http://doi.org/10.25273/jpfk.v3i1.1134

Yusuf, I., & Subaer, S. (2013). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Media Laboratorium Virtual Pada Materi Dualisme Gelombang Partikel Di SMA Tut Wuri Handayani Makassar. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia 2(2): 189-194. https://dx.doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v2i2.2722

Author Biographies

M. Ibnusaputra, University of Yogyakarta

Insih Wilujeng, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Heru Kuswanto, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

License

Copyright (c) 2023 M. Ibnusaputra, Insih Wilujeng, Heru Kuswanto

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).