Student’s Computational Thinking Ability in Solving Trigonometry Problems in the Review of Self-Regulated Learning
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i2.2821Published:
2023-02-28Issue:
Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): FebruaryKeywords:
Computational thinking, Problem-solving, Self-regulated learning, TrigonometryResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This research is motivated by the habits we often encounter in learning, especially in mathematics. Each student has different computational thinking abilities. Computational thinking ability is a thinking ability that supports problem-solving solutions. Computational thinking components include decomposition, pattern recognition, abstraction, and algorithm design. This research aims to: 1) Describe the computational thinking abilities of students with high self-regulated learning in solving trigonometry problems, 2) Describe the computational thinking abilities of students with moderate self-regulated learning in solving trigonometry problems, 3) Describe the computational thinking abilities of students with low self-regulated learning in solving trigonometry problems. This research used a qualitative approach with a case study type of research. This research was conducted at SMKN 2 Tulungagung which was attended by all students of class XI TKRO 3, totaling 32 students. Of the 32 students, 6 students will be selected as subjects who are classified based on the level of self-regulated learning. Data collection techniques used are observation, tests, interviews, and documentation. Data analysis techniques were carried out through the stages of data collection, data presentation, and conclusion. The results of this research indicate that: 1) students with high self-regulated learning can fulfill 3-4 indicators of computational thinking skills in solving trigonometry problems, 2) students with moderate self-regulated learning can fulfill 2-3 indicators of computational thinking skills in solving trigonometry problems, 3) and students with low self-regulated learning can fulfill 0-1 indicators of computational thinking skills in solving trigonometry problems
References
Agustina, L., Putri, A., & Lestari, I. (2020). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika dengan Metode Problem Posing. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains, 1(22), 425–432. https://www.proceeding.unindra.ac.id/index.php/sinasis/article/view/4059
Akhdiyat, A. M., & Hidayat, W. (2018). Pengaruh Kemandirian Belajar Matematik Siswa Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa Sma. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 1(6), 1045. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v1i6.p1045-1054
Angeli, C., Voogt, J., Fluck, A., Webb, M., Cox, M., Malyn-Smith, J., & Zagami, J. (2016). A K-6 computational thinking curriculum framework: Implications for teacher knowledge. Educational Technology and Society, 19(3), 47–57. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.3.47
Anthonysamy, L., Koo, A. C., & Hew, S. H. (2020). Self-regulated learning strategies and non-academic outcomes in higher education blended learning environments: A one decade review. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 3677–3704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10134-2
Badrulaini. (2018). Hubungan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dan Kemandirian Belajar terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Peserta Didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 2(4), 847–855. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v2i4.32
Barcelos, T. S., Munoz, R., Villarroel, R., Merino, E., & Silveira, I. F. (2018). Mathematics learning through computational thinking activities: A systematic literature review. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 24(7), 815–845. https://www.jucs.org/jucs_24_7/mathematics_learning_through_computational/jucs_24_07_0815_0845_barcelos.pdf
Cahdriyana, R. A., & Richardo, R. (2020). Berpikir Komputasi Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. LITERASI (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan), 11(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.21927/literasi.2020.11(1).50-56
Danindra, L. S., & Masriyah. (2020). Proses Berpikir Komputasi Siswa Smp Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Pola Bilangan Ditinjau Dari Perbedaan Jenis Kelamin. MATHEdunesa, 9(1), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v9n1.p95-103
Denning, & Tedre. (2019). Computational Thinking. Library of Congress Under Grant.
Hakiki, S. N., & Sundayana, R. (2022). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis pada Materi Kubus dan Balok Berdasarkan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v2i1.1582
Hong, J. C., Lee, Y. F., & Ye, J. H. (2021). Procrastination predicts online self-regulated learning and online learning ineffectiveness during the coronavirus lockdown. Personality and Individual Differences, 174, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110673
Imanisa, N., & Effendi, K. N. S. (2022). Kemandirian Belajar Siswa SMP Kelas Vll Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Matematika. Seminar Nasional Matematika, 661–668. https://conference.unsika.ac.id/cgi-sys/suspendedpage.cgi
Lee, T. Y., Mauriello, M. L., Ahn, J., & Bederson, B. B. (2014). CTArcade: Computational thinking with games in school age children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 2(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2014.06.003
Makur, A. P., Jehadus, E., Fedi, S., Jelatu, S., Murni, V., & Raga, P. (2021). Kemandirian Belajar Mahasiswa dalam Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Selama Masa Pandemi. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v10i1.862
Mania, S. (2021). Pengembangan instrumen tes untuk mengukur kemampuan berpikir komputasi siswa. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 4(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v4i1.17-26
Maraza-Quispe, B., Sotelo-Jump, A. M., Alejandro-Oviedo, O. M., Quispe-Flores, L. M., Cari-Mogrovejo, L. H., Fernandez-Gambarini, W. C., & Cuadros-Paz, L. E. (2021). Towards the Development of Computational Thinking and Mathematical Logic through Scratch. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 12(2), 332–338. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0120242
Maryono, M. (2020). Proses Berpikir Mahasiswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Berstandar PISA (Programme for International Student Assesment). Journal of Education and Learning Mathematics Research (JELMaR), 1(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.37303/jelmar.v1i1.1
Murti, E. D., Nasir, N., & Negara, H. S. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis : Dampak Model Pembelajaran SAVI ditinjau dari Kemandirian Belajar Matematis. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 2(2), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v2i2.4072
Nuraisa, D., Saleh, H., & Raharjo, S. (2021). Profile of Students’ Computational Thinking Based on Self-Regulated Learning in Completing Bebras Tasks. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 40. https://doi.org/10.31000/prima.v5i2.4173
Pratiwi, A. A., Effendi, M. M., & Ummah, S. K. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi Pembelajaran Matematika Tipe PISA Berkarakteristik Kebudayaan Lokal. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika RAFA, 6(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.19109/jpmrafa.v6i1.4985
Rahmadhani, L. I. P., & Mariani, S. (2021). Kemampuan Komputasional Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika SMP Melalui Digital Project Based Learning Ditinjau Dari Self Efficacy. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 4, 289–297. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/45048/18330
Santoso, H. A. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasional Siswa Sma Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Ditinjau Dari Perbedaan Jenis Kelamin. Maju, 8(1), 299–303. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339617033_ANALISIS_KEMAMPUAN_BERPIKIR_KOMPUTASIONAL_SISWA_SMA
Septiyana, W., & Pujiastuti, H. (2018). Model Pembelajaran Matematika Knisley Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman Konseptual Matematis Siswa Smp. KALAMATIKA Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.22236/kalamatika.vol3no2.2018pp155-174
Setiana, D. S. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Matematika Untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis. Jurnal Pendidikan Surya Edukasi (JPSE), 4(2), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v1i1.17-26
Shadiq, F. (2014). Pembelajaran Matematika cara meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir siswa. Graha Ilmu. https://docplayer.info/47279522-Pembelajaran-matematika-cara-meningkatkan-kemampuan-berpikir-siswa-oleh-fadjar-shadiq-m-app-sc-hak-cipta-2014-pada-penulis.html
Supiarmo, M. G. (2021). Transformasi Proses Berfikir Komputasional Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas Pada Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Melalaui Refleksi. In Tesis Universitas Negeri Malang.
Supiarmo, M. G., Turmudi, & Susanti, E. (2021). Proses Berpikir Komputasional Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pisa Konten Change and Relationship Berdasarkan Self-Regulated Learning. Numeracy, 8(1), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.46244/numeracy.v8i1.1378
Zhang, L. C., & Nouri, J. (2019). A systematic review of learning computational thinking through Scratch in K-9. Computers and Education, 141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103607
Author Biographies
Ummu Sholihah, Universitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah, Tulungagung
Mathematical Tadris
Alfi Inayatul Firdaus, Universitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ummu Sholihah, Alfi Inayatul Firdaus
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
