Application of Guided Inquiry Model Using Self-Regulated Learning Approach to Improve Student's Creative Disposition and Creative Thinking Skill in Biology Subject
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2836Published:
2023-01-31Issue:
Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): JanuaryKeywords:
Creative dispositions, Creative Thinking Skill, Guided Inquiry Model, Self Regulated LearningResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
Given the importance of globalization and the need to train students' thinking skills and broad knowledge to prepare them to face the demands of the 21st century work, education from the start needs to look more critically at educational practices and learning methods that should be directed. This study seeks to examine the effect of applying the guided inquiry model with the Self Regulated Learning approach to students' creative dispositions and creative thinking skills in high school biology learning. To achieve this goal, a sample of 70 students at one of the State Senior High Schools in Mataram, NTB. Subjects were purposively grouped into the experimental class, namely learning using the Guided Inquiry Model with the Self Regulated Learning (IT-SRL) Approach and the control class using the Ordinary Guided Inquiry (IT) model. Data on students' creative dispositions were obtained from a creative disposition questionnaire while data on students' creative thinking skills were obtained from tests of creative thinking skills which were compiled based on indicators of creative thinking skills. Hypothesis testing in this study uses. The results of the ANCOVA test showed that students who were taught using the guided inquiry model using the self-regulated learning (IT-SRL) approach had better creative dispositions and creative thinking skills than students who were taught using the inquiry method (IT).
References
Agogué, M., Kazakçi, A., Hatchuel, A., Masson, P. Le, Weil, B., Poirel, N., & Cassotti, M. (2013). The impact of type of examples on originality: Explaining fixation and stimulation effects. The Journal of CreaTive Behavior, 48(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/jocb.37
Ahmar, D. S. (2016). Hubungan antara regulasi diri dengan kemampuan berpikir kreatif dalam kimia peserta didik kelas XI IPA se-kabupaten takalar. Jurnal Sainsmat, 5(1), 7–23.
Amirullah, G., Akbar, B., Suciati, R., & Susilo. (2021). Mapping association: Analysis of elaboration skills trough creative mind mapping on the subject of environment change. Pyschological and Education, 58(1), 4741–4749. https://doi.org/ISSN: 00333077
Andrini, V. (2016). The effectiveness of inquiry learning method to enhance students’ learning outcome: A theoritical and empirical review. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(3), 38–42.
Arikunto, S. (2012). Prosedur Penelitian. Rineka Cipta.
Bardone, E., & Secchi, D. (2017). Inquisitiveness: distributing rational thinking. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 23(1/2), 66–81. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/TPM-10-2015-0044
Faradillah, A., & Maulida, A. (2022). Student’s creative thinking ability assisted augmented reality based on visualizer-verbalizer cognitive style. Jurnal Elemen, 8(2), 659–674. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v8i2.5693
Fatmawati, B., Miftahul Jannah, B., & Sasmita, M. (2022). Students creative thinking ability through creative problem solving based learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 2384–2388. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa .v8i4.1846
Fawcett, L. M., & Garton, A. F. (2005). The effect of peer collaboration on children’s problem-solving ability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 157–169.
Ferrándiz, C., Ferrando, M., Soto, G., Sáinz, M., & Prieto, M. D. (2017). Divergent thinking and its dimensions: What we talk about and what we evaluate? Anales de Psicologia, 33(1), 40–47.
Glassner, A., & Schwarz, B. B. (2007). What stands and develops between creative and critical thinking?. Argumentation? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(1), 10–18.
Graham, M. J., Frederick, J., Byars-Winston, A., & Anne-Barrie Hunter, Handelsman, J. (2013). Increasing persistence of college students in STEM. Science, 341(6153), 1455–1456. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240487
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2016). Imaginative Thinking in Science and Science Education (pp. 1–31). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29526-8_1
Jung, K.-R., Zhou, A. Q., & Lee, R. M. (2017). Self-efficacy, self-discipline and academic performance: Testing a context_specific mediation mod. Learning and Individual Differences, 60, 33–39. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.lindif.2017.10.004
Lucas, B., Claxton, G., & Spencer, E. (2016). A five-dimensional model of creativity and its assessment in schools. Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 278–290. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/08957347.2016.1209206
Manullang, B. (2013). Grand desain pendidikan karakter generasi emas 2045. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 3(1), 1–14.
Moeed, A. (2013). Science investigation that best supports student learning: Teachers understanding of science investigation. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 8(4), 537–559.
Mufiannoor, E., Hidayat, M., & Soetjipto. (2017). Melatih Kemampuan Berfikir kreatif dan pemahaman konsep dengan pembelajaran berbasis inkuiri terbimbing pada materi interaksi makhlik hidup dengan lingkungan. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pendidikan Sains, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v5n2.p934-941
Nurisalfah, R., Fadiawati, N., & T Jalmo. (2018). Enhancement of students’ creative thinking skills on mixture separation topic using project based student worksheet. 4th International Seminar of Mathematics, Science and Computer Science Education, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012085
Octavia, L. (2016). Mind map sebagai model pembelajaran menilai penguasaan konsep dan alat evaluasi menilai kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dan Saintek 2016: Isu-Isu Kontemporer Sains, Lingkungan Dan Inovasi Pembelajarannya, 629–634. ISSN: 2557-533X
Pluck, G., & Johnson, H. (2011). Stimulating curiosity to enhance learning. GESJ: Education Science and Psychology, 2(19), 24–31.
Ramdani, A., & Artayasa, I. P. (2020). Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Mahasiswa dalam Pembelajaran IPA Menggunakan Model Inkuiri Terbuka. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/ 10.24815/jpsi.v8i1.15394
Ramdani, A., Artayasa, I. P., Yustiqvar, M., & Nisrina, N. (2021). Enhancing prospective teachers’ creative thinking skills: A study of the transition from structured to open inquiry classes. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(3), 637–649. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i3.41758
Robson, S., & Rowe, V. (2012). Observing young children’s creative thinking: engagement, involvement and persistence. International Journal of Early Years Education, 20(4), 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2012.743098
Sannomiya, M., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2016). Creativity training in causal inference using the idea post-exposure paradigm: Effects on idea generation in junior high school students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.006
Septiani, D., & Susanti. (2021). Urgensi pembelajaran inkuiri di abad ke-21: Kajian literatur. Jurnal SAP, 6(1), 126–133. https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v6i1.7784
Silmi, M., & Kusmarni, Y. (2017). Menumbuhkan karakter rasa ingin tahu siswa dalam pembelajaran sejarah melalui media puzzle. FACTUM, 6(2), 230–242.
Sugilar, H. (2013). Meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan disposisi matematik siswa madrasah tsanawiyah melalui pembelajaran generaif. Infinity:Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Matematika, 2(2), 156–168.
Sukarso, A., Artayasa, I. P., Bahri, S., & Azizah, A. (2022). Provision of creative teaching materials in improving creative disposition and creative thinking skills of high school students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(6), 2728–2736. https://doi.org/10.29303/ jppipa.v8i6.2514
Sukarso, A., & Muslihatun. (2021). Mengembangkan keterampilan berpikir kreatif, sikap dan kemampuan bekerja ilmiah melalui pembelajaran praktikum proyek riset otentik. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 6(3), 467–475. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v6i3.268
Sukarso, A., Widodo, A., Rochintaniawati, D., & Purwianingsih, W. (2019). The potential of students’ creative disposition as a perspective to develop creative teaching and learning for senior high school biological science. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1–6. https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022092
Sukarso, A., Widodo, A., Rochintaniawati, D., & Purwianingsih, W. (2020). The contribution of biological practicum learning model based on creative research projects in forming scientific creativity of high school students. STEMEIF, 361–369.
Susetyarini, E., Endrik, N., & Husamah, H. (2022). Analysis of students’ collaborative, communication, critical thingking and creative abilities through problem based learning. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmu PendIdikan, 6(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/ 10.36312/esantika.v6i1.584
Thompson S., P., & Jacue, V. (2017). Self-Regulation, emotion, and resilience. In Creativity and the Performing Artist (p. 225). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/ B978-0-12-804051-5.00014-7
Torrance, E. P. (1979). An Instructional Model for Enhancing Incubation. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 13(1), 23–35.
Warsono, T., & Hariyanto, H. (2017). Pembelajaran Aktif: Teori dan Aplikasi. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Watson, L. (2017). Curiosity and Inquisitiveness : In Handbook of Virtue Epistemology (pp. 1–22). University of Edinburgh.
Widodo, A. (2015). Mengembangkan Keterampilan Berpikir Siswa. Mengembangkan Keterampilan Berpikir Siswa. Proceedings of Seminar Nasional Pendidikan MIPA 2015, 1–8.
Wijayati, N., Sumarni, W., & Supanti, S. (2019). Improving student creative thinking skills through project based learning. KnE Social Sciences, 3(18), 408–421. https://doi.org/ 10.18502/kss.v3i18.4732
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Spring, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421 tip4102_2
Zohar, A., & Barzilia, S. (2013). A review of research on metacognition in science education: current and future directions. Studied in Science Education, 49(2), 121–169. https://doi.org/htps://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.847261
Author Biographies
Shabilla Ramadhita Algiani, Universitas Mataram
I Putu Artayasa, University of Mataram
AA Sukarso, Universitas Mataram
Agus Ramdani, University of Mataram
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Shabilla Ramadhita Algiani, I Putu Artayasa, AA Sukarso, Agus Ramdani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
