Development of Inquiry-Based Teaching Materials to Improve the Creativity of Prospective Physics Teachers
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i2.3007Published:
2023-02-28Issue:
Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): FebruaryKeywords:
Creativity, Inquiry, Teaching materialResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This research is part of development research at the development stage. Inquiry-based teaching materials developed to increase the creativity of physics teacher candidates have been validated by experts and declared fit for use. At this stage, the aim is to determine the effectiveness of the developed teaching materials in increasing the creativity of prospective physics teachers. The effectiveness of teaching materials developed by researchers can be known by increasing students' creativity based on the results of the N-Gain test after being given a pretest and posttest. The creativity instrument used is a description test which is divided into verbal and figural creativity tests. The pretest average score for the verbal and figural creativity instruments was 62.71 and the posttest average score for creativity was 93.50 both verbal and visual. This value was then analyzed using the N-Gain test with a calculation result of 82.07%, which means that this value is classified into the high increase category. So it can be concluded that the development of inquiry-based teaching materials to increase the creativity of prospective physics teachers is valid and effective
References
Akpur, U. (2020). Critical, reflective, creative thinking and their reflections on academic achievement. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100683
Arends, R. (2012). Learning to Teach. (9th Ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Boronat, B. C., & Choueiry, H. (2022). Transforming creativity skills into creative habits. Arab Economic and Business Journal, 14(1), 80-93. https://doi.org/10.38039/2214-4625.1006
Byrge, C., & Gómez, P. N. (2019). New Perspectives for the role of Creativity in Education. Journal of Creativity and Business Innovation, 5(2019. Retrieved from https://www.journalcbi.com/new-perspectives-for-role-of-creativity-in-education.html
Cheng, K. K., Thacker. B. A., Cardenas, R. L., & Crouch, C. (2004). Using An Online Homework System Enhances Students’ Learning of Physics Concepts in An Introductory Physics Course. American Journal of Physics, 72(11) pp 1447-1453. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1768555
Chiappetta, E., L., & Koballa, T., R., Jr. (2010). Science instruction in the middle andsecondary schools (7thed). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc
Conradty, C., & Bogner, F. X. (2019). From STEM to STEAM: How to monitor creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 30(3), 233-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1488195
Conradty, C., & Bogner, F. X. (2020). STEAM teaching professional development works: Effects on students’ creativity and motivation. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00132-9
Glaveanu, V. P., Hanchett Hanson, M., Baer, J., Barbot, B., Clapp, E. P., Corazza, G. E., ... & Sternberg, R. J. (2020). Advancing creativity theory and research: A socioâ€cultural manifesto. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 741-745. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.395
Greenstein, L. M. (2012). Assessing 21st century skills: A guide to evaluating mastery and authentic learning. Corwin Press.
Gündoğdu, B., & Ali, M. E. R. Ç. (2022). A Systematic review of tech-supported collaborative creativity Practices in the field of education. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 7(1), 76-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.53850/joltida.953760
Henriksen, D., Richardson, C., & Shack, K. (2020). Mindfulness and creativity: Implications for thinking and learning. Thinking skills and creativity, 37, 100689. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.tsc.2020.100689
Jahnke, I., & Liebscher, J. (2020). Three types of integrated course designs for using mobile technologies to support creativity in higher education. Computers & Education, 146, 103782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103782
Kaplan, D. E. (2019). Creativity in Education: Teaching for Creativity Development. Psychology, 10(2), 140-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/psych.2019.102012
Kim, S., Choe, I., & Kaufman, J. C. (2019). The development and evaluation of the effect of creative problem-solving program on young children’s creativity and character. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100590
Kusdiastuti, M., Harjono, A., Sahidu, H., & Gunawan, G. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Berbantuan Laboratorium Virtual Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Fisika Peserta Didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 2(3), 116-122. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v2i3.298
Lian, B., Kristiawan, M., & Fitriya, R. (2020). Giving creativity room to students through the friendly school’s program. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 7 (7).
Mierdel, J., & Bogner, F. X. (2019). Is creativity, hands-on modeling and cognitive learning gender-dependent?. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 91-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.11.001
Mardianti, F., Yulkifli, Y., & Asrizal, A. (2020). Metaanalisis Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Literasi Saintifik. Sainstek: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi, 12(2), 91-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.31958/js.v12i2.2435
Munandar, M. R. (2014). Pengaruh keselamatan, kesehatan kerja (K3) dan insentif terhadap motivasi dan kinerja karyawan (studi pada pekerja bagian produksi PT. Sekawan Karyatama Mandiri Sidoarjo) (Doctoral dissertation, Brawijaya University).
Nurmayani, L., & Doyan, A. (2018). Pengaruh model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing terhadap hasil belajar fisika peserta didik. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v4i2.113
Puccio, G. J., Burnett, C., Acar, S., Yudess, J. A., Holinger, M., & Cabra, J. F. (2020). Creative problem solving in small groups: The effects of creativity training on idea generation, solution creativity, and leadership effectiveness. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(2), 453-471. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.381
Saguni, F. (2019). The Effect of Cognitive, Affective and Psychomotor Development on Children's Creativity in Education Games of Al-Khairaat Kindergrten at Palu City. Journal of Education and Practice, 10(4), 47-53. Retrieved from https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/46474
Satria, H., Yulkifli, & Ramli. (2019). Development Of Natural Science Books Inquiry Based Learning Model With Character Contents. Journal Of Research And Method In Education, 9(3), 49–56. Retrieved from http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jrme/papers/Vol-9%20Issue-3/Series-1/I0903014956.pdf
Siburian, J., Corebima, A. D., & Saptasari, M. (2019). The correlation between critical and creative thinking skills on cognitive learning results. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 19(81), 99-114. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1217299
Sutiani, A. (2021). Implementation of an inquiry learning model with science literacy to improve student critical thinking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 117-138. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1290975
Suyidno, S., Susilowati, E., Arifuddin, M., Misbah, M., Sunarti, T. and Dwikoranto, D. (2019) “Increasing Students Responsibility and Scientific Creativity through Creative Responsibility Based Learningâ€, Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 9(2), pp. 178–188. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v9n2.p178-188.
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmuel, M. I. (1974). Instructional Develoment for Training Teacher of Exceptional Children. Washinton DC. National Center for Improvement Educational System.
Vincent-Lancrin, S., González-Sancho, C., Bouckaert, M., de Luca, F., Fernández-Barrerra, M., Jacotin, G., ... & Vidal, Q. (2019). Fostering Students' Creativity and Critical Thinking: What It Means in School. Educational Research and Innovation. OECD Publishing. 2, rue Andre Pascal, F-75775 Paris Cedex 16, France
Walia, C. (2019). A dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 31(3), 237-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1641787
Yang, Y., Long, Y., Sun, D., Van Aalst, J., & Cheng, S. (2020). Fostering students’ creativity via educational robotics: An investigation of teachers’ pedagogical practices based on teacher interviews. British journal of educational technology, 51(5), 1826-1842. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12985
Yulkifli, Yanto, E., Agustia, R., Ihsan, I., & Yohandri. (2020). Development Of Electronic Physics Module For Class Xi High School Semester 2 Using Model Inquiry Based Learning Integrated Approach Contextual Teaching And Learning. Journal Of Research And Method In Education, 10(2), 41–52.
Author Biographies
Lovy Herayanti, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika
Habibi Habibi, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika
Baiq Azmi Sukroyanti, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Lovy Herayanti, Habibi Habibi, Baiq Azmi Sukroyanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
