Development of Inquiry Learning Model-Oriented Learning Tools on Plant Tissue Structure and Function Materials to Train Students' Creative Thinking Ability

Authors

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i7.3101

Published:

2023-07-25

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 7 (2023): July

Keywords:

Creative thinking, Inquiry, Learning tools

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Latjompoh, M., Ahmad, J., & Jusuf, W. M. . (2023). Development of Inquiry Learning Model-Oriented Learning Tools on Plant Tissue Structure and Function Materials to Train Students’ Creative Thinking Ability. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(7), 5653–5659. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i7.3101

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This research is a development research that aims to produce learning tools in the form of Learning Implementation Plans (RPP), Student Worksheets (LKPD) and Creative Thinking Tests oriented to inquiry learning models that are, practical and effective, so that they can be used in the learning process. The results showed that the quality of the products produced based on practicality aspects in limited trials met very practical criteria with an average value of 95. In the broad trial it met very practical criteria with an average score of 100 and the response assessment of learners got a score of 50 on the limited trial and a score of 101 on the broad trial. The results of the creative thinking test field test are limited to the average value of the pretest answers, namely the Elaboration indicator at 5.3%, then the Fluency indicator at 3.3%, then Flexibility at 3.1% and the lowest is Originality at 0.2%. The average results of the post-test answers to students' creative thinking ability in the limited test found that the most percentage was the Fluency indicator at 15.9%, then the Elaboration indicator at 12.6%, then Flexibility at 6.3% and the lowest was Originality at 1%. In the main field test, the average value of the pretest answer is the Fluency indicator of 2.9%, then the Elaboration indicator of 2.6%, then Flexibility of 2.4% and the lowest is Originality, which is 0.1%. The average result of the post-test answers to the creative thinking ability of students in the main field test was found that the most percentage was the Fluency indicator of 5.2%, then the Elaboration indicator of 4.8%, then Flexibility of 3.9% and the lowest was Originality, which was 1%.

References

Amtiningsih, S., Dwiastuti, S., & Sari, D. P. (2016). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kreatif melalui guided inkuiri dipadu brainstorming pada materi pencemaran air. Procceding Biology Education Conference, 13(1), 868–872. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosbi/article/view/5944

Armandita, P. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Pembelajaran Fisika di Kelas XI MIA 3 SMA Negeri 11 KOTA JAMBI. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 10(2), 129. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v10i2.17906

Asyafah, A. (2019). Menimbang Model Pembelajaran (Kajian Teoretis-Kritis atas Model Pembelajaran dalam Pendidikan Islam). TARBAWY: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Education, 6(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.17509/t.v6i1.20569

Avsec, S., & Kocijancic, S. (2016). A path model of effective technology-intensive inquiry-based learning. Educational Technology and Society, 19(1), 308–320. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.1.308

Daryanto, & Karim, S. (2017). Pembelajaran abad 21. Gava Media.

Dewi, H. R., Mayasari, T., & Handhika, J. (2019). Increasing creative thinking skills and understanding of physics concepts through application of stem-based inquiry. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 4(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.26740/jppipa.v4n1.p25-30

Djonomiarjo, T. (2020). Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar. Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal, 5(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.37905/aksara.5.1.39-46.2019

Fadilah, S. I., Kardi, S., & Supardi, Z. A. I. (2017). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Biologi Berbasis Inkuiri Materi Sistem Ekskresi Manusia untuk Melatih Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Kerjasama Siswa SMA. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains), 5(1), 779. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v5n1.p779-787

Fatkhurrokhman, M., Permata, E., Ekawati, R., & Rizal, S. U. (2017). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran teknik digital berbasis project based learning di jurusan pendidikan teknik elektro. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 7(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v7i1.12547

Febrianti, Y., Djahir, Y., & Fatimah, S. (2018). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif peserta didik dengan memanfaatkan lingkungan pada mata pelajaran ekonomi di SMA Negeri 6 Palembang. Jurnal PROFIT: Kajian Pendidikan Ekonomi Dan Ilmu Ekonomi, 3(1), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.36706/jp.v3i1.5561

Firdaus, H. M., Widodo, A., & Rochintaniawati, D. (2018). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan proses pengembangan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa SMP pada pembelajaran Biologi. Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 1(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.17509/aijbe.v1i1.11452

Haryanti, Y. D., & Saputra, D. S. (2019). Instrumen Penilaian Berpikir Kreatif pada Pendidikan Abad 21. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 5(2), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v5i2.1350

Irham, M., & Wiyani, N. A. (2017). Psikologi Pendidikan: Teori dan aplikasi dalam proses pembelajaran. Ar-Ruzz Media.

Jundu, R., Tuwa, P. H., & Seliman, R. (2020). Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa SD di Daerah Tertinggal dengan Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 10(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2020.v10.i2.p103-111

Marwiyah, S., Kamid, K., & Risnita, R. (2015). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif pada Mata Pelajaran IPA Terpadu Materi Atom, Ion, dan Molekul SMP Islam Al Falah. Edu-Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 4(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.22437/jmpmipa.v4i1.2365

Munandar, U. (2009). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Depdikbud dan Rineka Cipta.

Ngalimun. (2017). Strategi pembelajaran. Dua Satria Offet.

Purba, E. C. (2020). Kelor (Moringa oleifera Lam.): Pemanfaatan dan Bioaktivitas. Pro-Life, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33541/jpvol6Iss2pp102

Putra, R. D., Rinanto, Y., Dwiastuti, S., & Irfa’I, I. (2016). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa melalui model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing pada siswa kelas XI MIA 1 SMA Negeri Colomadu Karanganyar tahun pembelajaran 2015/2016. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 13(1), 330–334. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosbi/article/view/5738

Qomariyah, D., & Subekti, H. (2021). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif. Pensa: E-Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 9(2), 242–246. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/pensa/article/view/38250

Rasyid, A. (2017). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Biologi Bervisi SETS Kompetensi Ekologi dan Kerusakan Lingkungan Sekolah enengah Atas. Jurnal Bio Educatio, 2(2), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.31949/be.v2i1.580

Rinarta, I. N., Yuanita, L., & Widodo, W. (2014). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Model Inkuiri untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Penguasaan Konsep Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 2(2), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.24127/jpf.v2i2.125

Ritter, S. M., X., G., M., C., & Biekens, P. (2020). Fostering students’ creative thinking skills by means of a one-year creativity training program. PLoS ONE, 15(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229773.

Rodríguez, G., Pérez, N., Núñez, G., Baños, J.-E., & Carrió, M. (2019). Developing creative and research skills through an open and interprofessional inquiry-based learning course. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 134. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1563-5

Samura, A. O. (2019). Kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kreatif matematis melalui pembelajaran berbasis masalah. MES: Journal of Mathematics Education and Science, 5(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.30743/mes.v5i1.1934

Sanjaya, W. (2009). Perencanaan dan desain sistem pembelajaran. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Sekar, D. K., Pudjawan, K., & Margunayasa, I. G. (2015). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif dalam pembelajaran IPA pada siswa kelas IV di SD Negeri 2 Pemaron kecamatan Buleleng. Mimbar PGSD Undiksha, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v3i1.5823

Sugiyono, S. (2019). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan (Research and Development). Alfabeta.

Ulandari, N., Putri, R., Ningsih, F., & Putra, A. (2019). Efektivitas model pembelajaran inquiry terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa pada materi Teorema Pythagoras. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v3i2.99

Warif, M. (2019). Strategi Guru Kelas dalam Menghadapi Peserta Didik yang Malas Belajar. TARBAWI : Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 4(01), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.26618/jtw.v4i01.2130

Author Biographies

Masra Latjompoh, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Jusna Ahmad, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Winda Minarti Jusuf, Gorontalo State University

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Masra Latjompoh, Jusna Ahmad, Winda Minarti Jusuf

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).