The Effectiveness of the Reading to Learn (R2L) Model on Scientific Literacy Skills on Static Electricity Topic

Authors

Khairil Arif , Olyivia Retdwina Rusma , Aulia Musva Putri , Firda Azzahra

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.3140

Published:

2023-08-25

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 8 (2023): August

Keywords:

N-gain, Reading to learn (R2L), Sains literacy

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Arif, K., Rusma, O. R. ., Putri, A. M. ., & Azzahra, F. . (2023). The Effectiveness of the Reading to Learn (R2L) Model on Scientific Literacy Skills on Static Electricity Topic . Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(8), 6425–6431. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.3140

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the difference in science learning outcomes between groups of students who participated in learning with the Reading to Learn (R2L) model and direct learning, by analyzing the literacy skills of class IX students at Junior High School in Bukittinggi, West Sumatra. The study population was all students of class IX and the sample class was selected by purposive sampling technique, so that class IX-6 was obtained as the experimental group and class IX-4 as the control group, with a sample of 56 students. This research is a quasi-experimental research with a pretest and posttest group design pattern. The data collected is a test of learning outcomes which are analyzed quantitatively to measure students' scientific literacy skills which are grouped into 3 aspects, namely numerical, conceptual, and multidimensional aspects. The instrument used is a scientific literacy test in the form of 10 description questions. The results show that the research hypothesis H1 is accepted because the table shows that t count > t table. This hypothesis test found that the application of the Reading to Learn (R2L) approach had an effect on students' scientific literacy skills. While the results of the experimental group N-Gain was 0.44 or 44% in the medium category (less effective). So we look at some of the factors causing it by giving questionnaires to students. Based on statistical calculations, the scores for each indicator in the questionnaire are 87.5% of students using local languages in daily conversation, reading time of 10-30 minutes is 46.88%, and courses or tutoring outside school hours are 28.13%.

References

Ali, L. U. (2018). Pengelolaan Pembelajaran IPA Ditinjau Dari Hakikat Sains Pada SMP Di Kabupaten Lombok Timur. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 6(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v6i2.1020

Deviana, E., & Sabri, T. (2017). Korelasi Minat Baca dengan Hasil Belajar pada Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Siswa Kelas III SD. . . Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa (JPPK), 6(2). Retrieved from https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/article/view/18762%0Ahttps://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/article/download/18762/15802

Fitriani, A., Kartini, A., Maulani, M., & Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, P. (2022). Peran Guru dan Strategi Pembelajaran dalam Memenuhi Kompetensi Siswa Abad 21. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 6(2), 16491–16498. Retrieved from https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/5056

Fitriyana, N., Wiyarsi, A., Ikhsan, J., & Sugiyarto, K. H. (2020). Android-based-game and blended learning in chemistry: Effect on students’ self-efficacy and achievement. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(3), 507–521. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i3.28335

Hake, R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores.AREA-D American Education Research Association’s Devision.D. Measurement and Reasearch Methodology.

Kiang, K. M., & Colanero, K. (2020). A Classics Reading approach to nurture Epistemic Insight in a multidisciplinary and Higher Education context. In Science Education in the 21st Century (pp. 51–65). Springer.

Lestari, P. W., Imansyah, F., & Kuswidyanarko, A. (2022). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Kelas V SD. Indonesian Research Journal On Education, 2(2), 471–477. https://doi.org/10.31004/irje.v2i2.287

Martínez, J. A., & Milagro, F. I. (2015). Genetics of weight loss: A basis for personalized obesity management. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 42(2), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2014.12.007

Mualimah, E. N., & Usmaedi, U. (2018). Pengaruh Kebiasaan Membaca Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Bahasa Indonesia Siswa Kelas V Sdn Kubanglaban. In Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar (Vol. 4, Issue 1, p. 43). https://doi.org/10.30870/jpsd.v4i1.2459

Muttaqiin, A., & Sopandi, W. (2016). Pengaruh Model Discovery Learning Dengan Sisipan Membaca Kritis Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Edusains, 8(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v8i1.1752

Nani, N., & Hendriana, E. C. (2019). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Di Kelas V SDN 12 Singkawang. Journal of Educational Review and Research, 2(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.26737/jerr.v2i1.1853

Nasriyanti, R., Cahyaningsih, U., & Nahdi, D. S. (2021). Pentingnya Model CORE Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Pada Mata Pelajaran IPA. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, 3, 104–110. Retrieved from https://prosiding.unma.ac.id/index.php/semnasfkip/article/view/569

Nurcholis, R. A., & Istiningsih, G. (2021). Problematika dan Solusi Program Literasi Baca-Tulis Siswa Kelas Rendah di SD Negeri Butuh. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 6(2), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v6i2.206

OECD. (2019). Programme for international student assessment (PISA) results from PISA 2018. In Oecd. OECD. Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2018-results-volumeiii_%0Abd69f805-en%0A

Puskurbuk. (2017). Konsep Literasi Sains dalam Kurikulum 2013. Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan.

Rose, D. (2021). What is Reading to Learn (R2L). Retrieved from https://readingtolearn.com.au/

Sari, P. A. P. (2020). Hubungan literasi baca tulis dan minat membaca dengan hasil belajar bahasa indonesia. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 3(1), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v3i1.24324

Septiani, D. A., Junaidi, E., & Purwoko, A. A. (2019). Hubungan Antara Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Kemampuan Literasi Sains Pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia di Universitas Mataram. Prosiding Seminar Nasional FKIP Universitas Mataram Mataram, 11-12 Oktober 2019, 1, 15–19. Retrieved from https://jurnalfkip.unram.ac.id/index.php/PSN/article/view/1579

Sianturi, R. (2022). Uji homogenitas sebagai syarat pengujian analisis. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains Sosial, Dan Agama, 8(1), 386–397. https://doi.org/10.53565/pssa.v8i1.507

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. PT Alfabeta Sukaridhoto.

Sundayana, R. (2016). Statistikan Penelitian Pendidikan. Alfabet.

Supangat, A. (2007). Statistika dalam Kajian Deskriptif, Inferensi, dan Nonparametik. Kencana penada media group.

Suparya, I. K., I Wayan Suastra, & Putu Arnyana, I. B. (2022). Rendahnya Literasi Sains: Faktor Penyebab Dan Alternatif Solusinya. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Citra Bakti, 9(1), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.38048/jipcb.v9i1.580

Thahir, R., Magfirah, N., & Anisa, A. (2021). Pengembangan Penuntun Praktikum Keanekaragaman Hewan Berbasis Contextual Teaching and Learning Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi. Jurnal Biotek, 9(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.24252/jb.v9i1.20936

Trisnani, N., & Sari, E. F. (2021). Keefektifan Model Realistic Mathematics Education Berbantuan Media Dakon Terhadap Hasil Belajar Perkalian. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 11(2), 173–178. Retrieved from https://ejournal.uksw.edu/scholaria/article/view/3642

Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253

Wahab, A., Syahid, A., & Junaedi. (2021). Penyajian data dalam tabel distribusi frekuensi dan aplikasinya pada Ilmu pendidikan. Education and Learning Journal, 2(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.33096/eljour.v2i1.91

Zulaiha, F., & Kusuma, D. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta didik SMP di Kota Cirebon. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 7(2), 190–201. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v7i2.3049

Author Biographies

Khairil Arif, Universitas Negeri Padang

Olyivia Retdwina Rusma, Universitas Negeri Padang

Aulia Musva Putri, Universitas Negeri Padang

Firda Azzahra, Universitas Negeri Padang

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Khairil Arif, Olyivia Retdwina Rusma, Aulia Musva Putri, Firda Azzahra

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).