Identification of Physics Misconceptions Using Five-tier Diagnostic Test: Newton’s Law of Gravitation Context

Authors

Zikra Juita , Putri Dwi Sundari , Silvi Yulia Sari , Fanny Rahmatina Rahim

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.3147

Published:

2023-08-25

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 8 (2023): August

Keywords:

Five-tier diagnostic test, Newton’s law of gravitation, Physics misconceptions

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Juita, Z. ., Sundari, P. D. ., Sari, S. Y. ., & Rahim, F. R. . (2023). Identification of Physics Misconceptions Using Five-tier Diagnostic Test: Newton’s Law of Gravitation Context . Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(8), 5954–5963. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.3147
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Metrics

PDF views
352
Aug 25 '23Aug 28 '23Aug 31 '23Sep 01 '23Sep 04 '23Sep 07 '23Sep 10 '23Sep 13 '23Sep 16 '23Sep 19 '23Sep 22 '234.0
|

Abstract

Students' understanding of several topics in physics is still low. The teachers only focus on completing curriculum targets without considering their student's understanding and most of them have misconceptions. The study aimed to identify students' misconceptions of physics concepts using the five-tier diagnostic test. Data was collected once using a descriptive-quantitative method. The research sample consisted of 18 students from one of the high schools in West Sumatra. A total of 17 questions was used to identify students' understanding of Newton's law of gravitation. The results showed that students had misconceptions as follows: gravitational attraction is only caused by planets; there is no gravitational force in space, and the direction of the gravitational force is determined by the direction of the gravitational attraction by some objects; two objects have different gravitational force strengths; all planets revolve around one another, the orbit of the solar system is perfectly circular, the shape of the earth is round, and the strength of the gravitational field is affected by the mass of the object. In conclusion, the highest percentage of misconceptions occurs in the influence of the gravitational field strength, which was 23%.

References

Anam, R. S., Widodo, A., Sopandi, W., & Wu, H. K. (2019). Developing a five-tier diagnostic test to identify students’ misconceptions in science: an example of the heat transfer concepts. Elementary Education Online, 18(3), 1014–1029. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2019.609690

Aulia, S., Diana, N., & Yuberti, Y. (2018). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Smp Pada Materi Fisika Analysis of Misconception of Junior High School Students in Physical Materials. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 01(2), 155–161. Retrieved from https://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/IJSME/index

Bayuni, T. C., Sopandi, W., & Sujana, A. (2018). Identification misconception of primary school teacher education students in changes of matters using a five-tier diagnostic test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012086

Cakmakci, G. (2010). Identifying alternative conceptions of chemical kinetics among secondary school and undergraduate students in Turkey. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(4), 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed8001336

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. In Educational Research (Vol. 4). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Dendodi, Maria, H. T., & Hamdani. (2020). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Four Tier Test Dilengkapi Dengan Self-Diagnosis Sheet Tentang Energi Di Sma. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 1(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.26418/jippf.v1i1.41854

Fariyani, Q., Rusilowati, A., & Sugianto. (2015). Pengembangan Four-tier Diagnostic Test untuk Mengungkap Miskonsepsi Fisika Siswa SMA Kelas X. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 4(2), 41–49. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jise/article/view/9903

Gardner, M., Greeno, J. ., Reif, F., Schoendeld, A. ., & Stage, E. (2009). Toward a Scientific Practice of Science Education. New York: Routledge.

Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2021). Students’ Reactions to Natural and Physical Phenomena: Documenting Wonder and Engagement with Science Content Knowledge. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(1), e2261. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11340

Halliday, D., Resnick, R., & Bowen, G. H. (2014). Fundamentals of Physics, 10th edition. United States of America: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3070817

Handhika, J., Cari, C., Soeparmi, A., & Sunarno, W. (2015). Exsternal representation to overcome misconception in physics. International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education 2015, 2015(Icmse), 34–37. Retrieved from http://icmseunnes.com/2015/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/76_PE.pdf

Kaltakci-Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2017). Development and application of a four-tier test to assess pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions about geometrical optics. Research in Science and Technological Education, 35(2), 238–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1310094

Kaniawati, I., Samsudin, A., Hasopa, Y., Sutrisno, A. D., & Suhendi, E. (2016). The Influence of Using Momentum and Impulse Computer Simulation to Senior High School Students’ Concept Mastery. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 739(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/739/1/012060

Leinonen, R., Asikainen, M. A., & Hirvonen, P. E. (2013). Overcoming students’ misconceptions concerning thermal physics with the aid of hints and peer interaction during a lecture course. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 9(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.020112

Liu, O. L., Lee, H. S., & Linn, M. C. (2011). An investigation of explanation multiple-choice items in science assessment. Educational Assessment, 16(3), 164–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2011.611702

Low, D., & Kate, W. (2017). Weight, the Normal Force and Newton’s Third Law: Dislodging a Deeply Embedded Misconception. Teaching Science: The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 63(2), 17–26. Retrieved from https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/INFORMIT.941951039775720

Meyer, H. (2004). Novice and expert teachers’ conceptions of learners’ prior knowledge. Science Education, 88(6), 970–983. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20006

Ozdem, Y., & Bilican, K. (2020). Discovery Learning—Jerome Bruner. In B. Akpan and T. Kennedy (Ed.), Science Education: Theory and Practice (pp. 177–190). Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.5748/9contecsi2012/rf-456

Putra, A. S. U., Hamidah, I., & Nahadi. (2020). The development of five-tier diagnostic test to identify misconceptions and causes of students’ misconceptions in waves and optics materials. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/2/022020

Putri, W. K., & Ermawati, F. U. (2021). Pengembangan, Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Tes Diagnostik Five-Tier untuk Materi Getaran Harmonis Sederhana beserta Hasil Uji Coba. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.5.1.92-101

Rehalat, A. (2014). Model Pembelajaran Pemrosesan Informasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial, 23(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpis.v23i2.1625

Renner, J. W., Abraham, M. R., Grzybowski, E. B., & Marek, E. A. (1992). Understandings and Misunderstandings of Eighth Graders of Four Physics Concepts Found in Textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270105

Rodriguez, M. C. (2003). Construct equivalence of multiple-choice and constructed-response items: A random effects synthesis of correlations. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2003.tb01102.x

Roediger, H. L., & Marsh, E. J. (2005). The Positive and Negative Consequences of Multiple-Choice Testing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 31(5), 1155–1159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1155

Rosita, I., Liliawati, W., & Samsudin, A. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Five-Tier Newton’s Laws Test (5TNLT) Untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi dan Penyebab Miskonsepsi Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 6(2), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v6i2.2018

Sarkity, D., & Sundari, P. D. (2020). Pemahaman Konsep Fisika Calon Guru Biologi Pada Topik Kinematika. Jurnal Pedagogi Hayati, 4(2), 106–116. Retrieved from https://ojs.umrah.ac.id/index.php/pedagogihayati/article/view/2569

Shidik, M. A. (2020). Hubungan Antara Motivasi Belajar Dengan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika Peserta Didik Man Baraka. Jurnal Kumparan Fisika, 3(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.33369/jkf.3.2.91-98

Smith, M. A., & Karpicke, J. D. (2014). Retrieval practice with short-answer, multiple-choice, and hybrid tests. Memory, 22(7), 784–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2013.831454

Syuhendri, S. (2019). Student teachers’ misconceptions about gravity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012047

Yu, K. C., Lin, K. Y., & Fan, S. C. (2015). An exploratory study on the application of conceptual knowledge and critical thinking to technological issues. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(3), 339–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9289-5

Author Biographies

Zikra Juita, Universitas Negeri Padang

Putri Dwi Sundari, Universitas Negeri Padang

Silvi Yulia Sari, Universitas Negeri Padang

Fanny Rahmatina Rahim, Universitas Negeri Padang

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Zikra Juita, Putri Dwi Sundari, Silvi Yulia Sari, Fanny Rahmatina Rahim

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).