Development and Validation of Physics Learning Motivation Survey (PLMS) using Rasch Analysis
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.3481Published:
2023-05-31Issue:
Vol. 9 No. 5 (2023): MayKeywords:
Motivation, Physics learning, Rasch analysis, SurveyResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
Motivation can affect the success of students’ learning. Teachers need a valid instrument to measure students’ motivation while learning physis. This study aims to describe the process of developing and validating of physics learning motivation survey (PLMS) for senior high school. Research and development approach is implemented in this study by following stages: define, design, develop, and disseminate. In the previous study, the survey has been generated 40 items with eight factors including teachers’ factor, carrier plan, learning strategy, self-efficacy, instructional media, learning environment, learning interest, and online/offline instruction. The present study is to validate empirically the survey using Rach analysis by involving 947 senior high school students in Kalimantan Barat. The results from Rach analysis show that 35 items are acceptable which have infit and outfit mean square value from 0.5 to 1.5 logits. Then item reliability and person reliability are 0.99 and 0.91 respectively. This indicates that the PLMS is valid and reliable to measure students’ motivation in learning physics
References
Abraham, J., & Barker, K. (2015). An Expectancy-Value Model for Sustained Enrolment Intentions of Senior Secondary Physics Students. Research in Science Education. 45:509–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9434-x
Abraham, J., & Barker, K. (2020). Motivation and Engagement with Physics: a Comparative Study of Females in Single-Sex and Co-educational Classrooms. Research in Science Education. 50:2227–2242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9770-3
Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. (2022). Capaian Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah Pada Kurikulum Merdeka.
Balta, N., Japashov, N., SalibaÅ¡ić GlamoÄić, D., & MeÅ¡ić, V. (2022). Development of the High School Wave Optics Test. Journal of Turkish Science Education. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.123
Ceberio, M., AlmudÃ, J. M., & Franco, Ã. (2016). Design and Application of Interactive Simulations in Problem-Solving in University-Level Physics Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 590–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9615-7
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & MOrrison, K. 2018. Research Methods in Education, 8th edition, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London.
Cvenic, K. M., Planinic, M., Susac, M., Ivanjek, L., Jelicic, K., & Hopf, M. (2022). Development and validation of the conceptual survey on the wave optics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(1), 010103. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.010103.
Docktor, J. L., Strand, N. E., Mestre, J. P., & Ross, B. H. (2015). Conceptual problem solving in high school physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020106.
Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2009). Science motivation questionnaire: Construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20267
Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159–1176. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20442
Hsu, L., Brewe, E., Foster, T. M., & Harper, K. A. (2004). Resource Letter RPS-1: Research in problem solving. American Journal of Physics, 72(9), 1147–1156. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1763175
Kirschner, S., Borowski, A., Fischer, H. E., Gess-Newsome, J., & von Aufschnaiter, C. (2016). Developing and evaluating a paper and pencil test to assess components of physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 38(8): 1347-1372. https: //doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1190479
Kuo, E., Hull, M. M., Gupta, A., & Elby, A. (2013). How students blend conceptual and formal mathematical reasoning in solving physics problems. Science Education, 97(1), 32–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21043
Linacre, J. M. (2022). A user’s guide to WINSTEP, MINISTEP, Rasch model computer programs, Program Manual 5.3.3. Retrieved from http://www.winstep.com/manuals.htm
Liu, X. (2010). Using and developing measurement instruments in science education: a rasch modelling approach. Information Age Publishing.
Luo, T., Wang, J., Liu, X., & Zhou, J. (2019). Development and application of a scale to measure students’ STEM continuing motivation. International Journal of Science Education, 41(14):1885-1904. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09500693.2019.1647472
Neumann, I., Neumann, K., & Nehm, R. (2011). Evaluating Instrument Quality in Science Education: Raschâ€based analyses of a Nature of Science test. International Journal of Science Education, 33(10): 1373-1405. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09500693.2010.511297
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results (volume I): excellence and equity in education. PISA, OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
Planinic, M., Boone, W. J., Susac, A., & Ivanjek, L. R. (2019). Rasch analysis in physics education research: Why measurement matters. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), 020111. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020111
Podolefsky, N. S., Perkins, K. K., & Adams, W. K. (2010). Factors promoting engaged exploration with computer simulations. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020117
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Satria, R., Adiprima, P., Wulan, K. S., & Harjatanaya, T. Y. (2022). Panduan pengembangan projek penguatan profil pelajar pancasila. Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia.
Scheid, J., Müller, A., Hettmannsperger, R., & Schnotz, W. (2019). Improving learners’ representational coherence ability with experiment-related representational activity tasks. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.15.010142
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60(December 2019), 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
Sirait, J., Sutrisno, L., Balta, N., & Mason, A. (2017). The development of questionnaire to investigate students' attitudes and approaches in physics problem solving. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 13(2), 79-87. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v13i2.6592
Sirait, J., & Oktavianty, E. (2021). Pengembangan dan validasi angket motivasi belajar fisika (AMBF): studi pilot. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 5(3), 305-316. https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v5i3.3829
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel. M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. Leadership Training Institute/Special Education University of Minnesota.
Tuan, H. L., Chin, C. C., & Shieh, S. H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000323737
Velayutham, S., Aldridge, J., & Fraser, B. (2011). Development and validation of an instrument to measure students’ motivation and self-regulation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 33(15), 2159–2179. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.541529
Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8:3. Retrieved from https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt83.htm
Žák, V., & Kolář, P. (2023). Physics curriculum in upper secondary schools: What leading physicists want. Science Education, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21785
Zoechling, S., Hopf, M., Woithe, J., & Schmeling, S. (2022). Students’ interest in particle physics: conceptualisation, instrument development, and evaluation using Rasch theory and analysis. International Journal of Science Education 44(15), 2353-2380. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2122897
Author Biography
Judyanto Sirait, Universitas Tanjungpura
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Judyanto Sirait
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
