Development of H5P Moodle-Based Interactive STEM-Loaded Videos to Grow Performance Skills as an Effort to Overcome Learning Loss in Electrical Measuring Materials

Authors

Ida Susanti , Agus Suyatna , Kartini Herlina

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.3546

Published:

2023-09-25

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 9 (2023): September

Keywords:

H5P, Interactive videos, Learning loss, STEM, Work method

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Susanti, I. ., Suyatna, A. ., & Herlina, K. (2023). Development of H5P Moodle-Based Interactive STEM-Loaded Videos to Grow Performance Skills as an Effort to Overcome Learning Loss in Electrical Measuring Materials. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 6974–6984. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.3546
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This study aims to develop an interactive STEM-based video based on H5P Moodle that is valid, practical, and effective for cultivating performance skills as an effort to overcome learning loss in the material for measuring instruments. The research method used in this development is the R & D method using the ADDIE model which consists of five development steps namely: analyze, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The data collection instruments used include: needs analysis questionnaires, validation test questionnaires, practicality test questionnaires, and effectiveness test questionnaires. The trial design using research products shows that the H5P Moodle-based Interactive Video developed is valid, practical, effectively used in the closed-eye learning process (PTTM) through blended learning to foster performance skills as an effort to overcome learning loss. The results of the validity test obtained an average percentage of construction validity of 92.00% and content validation obtained an average percentage of 87.00%. The results of the practicality questionnaire analysis showed that the STEM-based Interactive Video based on the H5P Moodle was stated to be practical with product legibility obtaining a percentage of 96.00% in the very good category. The results of the teacher's response test using Interactive Video with STEM-based H5P Moodle obtained a percentage of 87.60% in the very good category. For student responses the percentage is 87.00%, this indicates an interactive video with STEM content based on the H5P Moodle that was developed practically. Effectiveness is shown by the results of the analysis of the average percentage of achievement of performance skills in the experimental class of 87.50 and 73.00% in the control class. An increase in performance skills of 14.50% shows that Interactive Video with STEM content based on Moodle's H5P is very effective for growing performance skills as an effort to overcome learning loss.

References

Afify, M. K. (2020). Effect of interactive video length within e-learning environments on cognitive load, cognitive achievement and retention of learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(4), 68–89. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.803360

Agustini, K., & Ngarti, J. G. (2020). Pengembangan video pembelajaran untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar siswa menggunakan model R&D. Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v4i1.18403

Albay, E. M., & Eisma, D. V. (2021). Performance task assessment supported by the design thinking process: Results from a true experimental research. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100116

Barman, M., & Jena, A. K. (2021). Effect of interactive video-based instruction on learning performance in relation to social skills of children with intellectual disability. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2021.2004535

Bennett, G. S. (2017). Comparison of interactive video test performance to overall class performance in a biomechanics course. Journal of Chiropractic Education, 32(1), 32–35. https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-16-00013

Bétrancourt, M., & Benetos, K. (2018). Why and when does instructional video facilitate learning? A commentary to the special issue “developments and trends in learning with instructional video.†Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 471–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.035

Biard, N., Cojean, S., & Jamet, E. (2018). Effects of segmentation and pacing on procedural learning by video. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.002

Cerelia, J. J., Sitepu, A. A., & Toharudin, T. (2021, December). Learning loss akibat pembelajaran jarak jauh selama pandemi Covid-19 di Indonesia. In E-Prosiding Seminar Nasional Statistika| Departemen Statistika FMIPA Universitas Padjadjaran (Vol. 10, pp. 27-27). Retrieved from https://semnas.statistics.unpad.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/erf_uploads/2021/11/Learning-Loss-Akibat-Pembelajaran-Jarak-Jauh-Selama-Pandemi-Covid-19-di-Indonesia.pdf

Cohen, S. S., Madsen, J., Touchan, G., Robles, D., Lima, S. F. A., Henin, S., & Parra, L. C. (2018). Neural engagement with online educational videos predicts learning performance for individual students. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 155, 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2018.06.011

Desai, T. S., & Kulkarni, D. C. (2022). Assessment of Interactive Video to Enhance Learning Experience: A Case Study. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 35, 74-80. Retrieved from https://journaleet.in/download-article.php?Article_Unique_Id=JPR1618&Full_Text_Pdf_Download=True

Diansah, I., & Suyatna, A. (2021). STEM-based physics multimedia design for stimulating HOTS on water and wind energy topic: Physics teacher perception. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1796(1), 012002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012002

Garber, G., Shumate, S., & Chester-Fangman, C. (2021). Interactive Video Tutorials from Scratch: Experiences and Lessons Learned Six Years On. Georgia International Conference on Information Literacy. 19. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/gaintlit/2021/2021/19

Gedera, D. S. P., & Zalipour, A. (2021). Conceptualising Video Pedagogy. Video Pedagogy: Theory and Practice, 1–17. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4009-1_1

González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of Education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: systematic review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493

Gürsoy, G. (2021). Digital Storytelling: Developing 21st Century Skills in Science Education. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 97–113. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1284122.pdf

Hameed, S., Badii, A., & Cullen, A. J. (2008). Effective e-learning integration with traditional learning in a blended learning environment. European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems, 60, 14. Retrieved from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=c90a14c315f33b961f5caf7d65491c5f7159a259

Kashyap, A. M., Sailaja, S. V., Srinivas, K. V. R., & Raju, S. S. (2021). Challenges in online teaching amidst covid crisis: Impact on engineering educators of different levels. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 34, 38–43. Retrieved from https://sciresol.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/srs-j/jeet/pdf/volume34/specialissue/JEET569.pdf

Khoiri, A., Komariah, N., Utami, R. T., Paramarta, V., & Sunarsi, D. (2021). 4Cs analysis of 21st century skills-based school areas. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1764(1), 012142. DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/1764/1/012142

Kuba, R., Rahimi, S., Smith, G., Shute, V., & Dai, C.-P. (2021). Using the first principles of instruction and multimedia learning principles to design and develop in-game learning support videos. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 1201–1220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09994-3

Leisner, D., Zahn, C., Ruf, A., & Cattaneo, A. (2020). Different ways of interacting with videos during learning in secondary physics lessons. HCI International 2020-Posters: 22nd International Conference, HCII 2020, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 19–24, 2020, Proceedings, Part II, 284–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50729-9_40

Lestari, S. (2021). Pengembangan Orientasi Keterampilan Abad 21 pada Pembelajaran Fisika melalui Pembelajaran PjBL-STEAM Berbantuan Spectra-Plus. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 6(3), 272–279. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v6i3.243

Mauliana, M. I., Shifiyah, N., Rahmawati, Y., & Nisa, K. (2022). Practicum E-Module Development to Improve Distance Learning Efficiency in Basic Physics Courses in the Pandemic Period. Acitya: Journal of Teaching and Education, 4(1), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.30650/ajte.v4i1.3212

Muskita, N. S., Ramadhani, V. M., Sallo’Padidi, A., Nurrochmah, D., & Kusumaningtyas, P. (2022). Blended Learning: Solusi Mengatasi Learning Loss dalam Pembelajaran. SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan), 7(2), 187–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/sap.v7i2.13368

Ntemngwa, C., & Oliver, J. S. (2018). The Implementation of Integrated Science Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Instruction Using Robotics in the Middle School Science Classroom. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 6(1), 12–40. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.380617

Pal, S., Pramanik, P. K. D., & Choudhury, P. (2019). A step towards smart learning: designing an interactive video-based m-learning system for educational institutes. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 14(4), 26–48. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.2019100102

Papadopoulou, A., & Palaigeorgiou, G. (2016). Interactive Video, Tablets and Self-Paced Learning in the Classroom: Preservice Teachers Perceptions. International Association for Development of the Information Society. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED571422.pdf

Preradovic, N. M., Lauc, T., & Panev, I. (2020). Investigating interactivity in instructional video tutorials for an undergraduate informatics course. Issues in Educational Research, 30(1), 203–223. Retrieved from https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/informit.086102978810594

Priyakanth, R., Abburi, R., & Praveena, M. (2021). Design and impact of interactive video content for the improvement of student engagement and learning. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 34, 518–523. Retrieved from https://sciresol.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/srs-j/jeet/pdf/volume34/specialissue/JEET639.pdf

Richtberg, S., & Girwidz, R. (2019). Learning physics with interactive videos–possibilities, perception, and challenges. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1287(1), 012057. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1287/1/012057

Shavelson, R. J., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Beck, K., Schmidt, S., & Marino, J. P. (2019). Assessment of university students’ critical thinking: Next generation performance assessment. International Journal of Testing, 19(4), 337–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2018.1543309

Singgih, S. (2021). Video-based learning for “learning from home†solution in pandemic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1760(1), 012011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1760/1/012011

Singleton, R., & Charlton, A. (2020). Creating H5P content for active learning. Pacific Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(1), 13–14. https://doi.org/10.24135/pjtel.v2i1.32

Sinnayah, P., Salcedo, A., & Rekhari, S. (2021). Reimagining physiology education with interactive content developed in H5P. Advances in Physiology Education, 45(1), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00021.2020

Sözeri, M. C., & Kert, S. B. (2021). Ineffectiveness of online interactive video content developed for programming education. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 4(3), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.21585/ijcses.v4i3.99

Stanley, T. (2021). When smart kids underachieve in school: Practical solutions for teachers. Routledge.

Thomas, J. E., & Graham, C. R. (2019). Online teaching competencies in observational rubrics: What are institutions evaluating? Distance Education, 40(1), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553564

Tomlin, G. (2005). The use of interactive video client simulation scores to predict clinical performance of occupational therapy students. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59(1), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.59.1.50

Author Biographies

Ida Susanti, Lampung University

Agus Suyatna, Lampung University

Kartini Herlina, Lampung University

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Ida Susanti, Agus Suyatna, Kartini Herlina

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).