Understanding the Framework of Sustainable Rural Livelihoods in the Implementation of Market-led Rural Development
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.3572Published:
2023-05-31Downloads
Abstract
Several studies have shown that market-driven rural development projects usually fall short of accurately understanding the complexity of the difficulties smallholder farmers experience in maintaining their livelihoods. It is also recommended that policies and research on rural development consider using the framework for sustainable livelihoods to examine the consequences of market-driven rural development initiatives. In order to comprehend the complexity of rural livelihoods and make policies and development programs implementing market-led rural development more empowering, this article attempts to explore the theories now accessible on sustainable livelihoods. This article offers a theoretical foundation for sustainable means of subsistence. This combines information from several sources to create more complete notions by providing a definition, potential significant justifications, and examples. The framework’s basic elements identified from the literature review are the context of livelihood, assets, institutions (transforming structures and processes), strategies, and outcomes.
Keywords:
Livelihoods Rural livelihoods Sustainable livelihoods Theoretical frameworkReferences
Batterbury, S. (2016). Scoones, Ian. 2015. Sustainable rural livelihoods and rural development. UK: Practical Action Publishing and Winnipeg, CA: Fernwood Publishing. Reviewed by Simon Batterbury. Journal of Political Ecology, 23(1), 492-494. http://dx.doi.org/10.2458/v23i1.20254
Bonnin, C., & Turner, S. (2012). At what price rice? Food security, livelihood vulnerability, and state interventions in upland northern Vietnam. Geoforum, 43(1), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.07.006
Borras Jr, S. M., Carranza, D., & Franco, J. C. (2007). Anti-poverty or anti-poor? The World Bank's market-led agrarian reform experiment in the Philippines. Third World Quarterly, 28(8), 1557-1576. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590701637409
Budisatria, I. G. S., & Udo, H. M. J. (2013). Goat-based aid programme in Central Java: An effective intervention for the poor and vulnerable? Small Ruminant Research, 109, 76-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2012.07.019
Challies, E. R., & Murray, W. E. (2011). The interaction of global value chains and rural livelihoods: The case of smallholder raspberry growers in Chile. Journal of agrarian change, 11(1), 29-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2010.00282.x
Chambers, R., & Conway, G. (1992). Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st century: Institute of Development Studies (UK).
Chiwaula, L. S., Witt, R., & Waibel, H. (2011). An asset-based approach to vulnerability: The case of small-scale fishing areas in Cameroon and Nigeria. The Journal of Development Studies, 47(2), 338-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220381003599410
Devaux, A., Torero, M., Donovan, J., & Horton, D. (2018). Agricultural innovation and inclusive value-chain development: a review. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 8(1), 99-123. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-06-2017-0065
Devereux, S., Sabates-Wheeler, R., & Longhurst, R. (2013). Seasonality, rural livelihoods and development: Routledge.
DFID UK. (1999). Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets. Retrieved from http://www.eldis.org/vfile/upload/1/document/0901/section2.pdf
Diniz, F. H., Hoogstra-Klein, M. A., Kok, K., & Arts, B. (2013). Livelihood strategies in settlement projects in the Brazilian Amazon: Determining drivers and factors within the Agrarian Reform Program. Journal of rural studies, 32, 196-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.06.005
Dorward, A. R., Anderson, S., Bernal, Y. N., Vera, E. S., Rushton, J., Pattison, J., & Paz, R. (2009). Hanging in, stepping up and stepping out: livelihood aspirations and strategies of the poor. Development in Practice, 19(2), 240-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09614520802689535
Dorward, A. R., Anderson, S., & Paz, R. (2005). A guide to indicators and methods for assessing the contribution of livestock keeping to livelihoods of the poor. Department of Agricultural Sciences, Imperial College London.
Dorward, A. R., Poole, N., Morrison, J., Kydd, J., & Urey, I. (2003). Markets, Institutions and Technology: Missing Links in Livelihoods Analysis. Development Policy Review, 21(3), 319-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-7679.00213
Ellis, F., & Mdoe, N. (2003). Livelihoods and rural poverty reduction in Tanzania. World Development, 31(8), 1367-1384.
Elizondo, D. (2017). Guidance Note: Application of the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework in Development Project. Panama: United Nation Development Programme,. Retrieved from http://www.latinamerica.undp.org/
Gayatri, S., & Vaarst, M. (2015). The Implementation of Indonesia's Beef Self-Sufficiency Programme (BSSP) as Seen from a Farmer-Family Perspective. Journal of Rural & Community Development, 10(2).
Haymes, S., de Haymes, M. V., & Miller, R. (2014). The Routledge Handbook of Poverty in the United States: Routledge.
Kent, R., & Dorward, A. R. (2012). Conceptualizing assets and asset services in livelihoods and ecosystem analyses for poverty reduction. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/display/9550652?utm_source=pdf&utm_medium=banner&utm_campaign=pdf-decoration-v1
Lapeyre, R. (2011). The Grootberg lodge partnership in Namibia: towards poverty alleviation and empowerment for long-term sustainability? Current Issues in Tourism, 14(3), 221-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2011.555521
Liu, Z., Chen, Q., & Xie, H. (2018). Influence of the farmer’s livelihood assets on livelihood strategies in the Western Mountainous Area, China. Sustainability, 10(3), 875. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030875
Lubungu, M., Sitko, N. J., & Hichaambwa, M. (2015). Analysis of Beef Value Chain in Zambia: Challenges and Opportunities of Linking Smallholders to Markets. Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
Lynch, K. (2006). Neo-liberalism and marketisation: The implications for higher education. European Educational Research Journal, 5(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2006.5.1.1
Meinzen-Dick, R., Johnson, N., Quisumbing, A. R., Njuki, J., Behrman, J. A., Rubin, D., . . . Waithanji, E. (2014). The gender asset gap and its implications for agricultural and rural development. In Agnes R. Quisumbing, Ruth Meinzen- Dick, Terri L. Raney, André Croppenstedt, Julia A. Behrman, & A. Peterman (Eds.), Gender in Agriculture: Closing the Knowledge Gap (pp. 91-116). Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London: The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Springer Science + Business Media B.V., Dordrecht 2014.
Mensah, E. J. (2011). The sustainable livelihood framework: A reconstruction. MPRA Paper, 46733.
Morse, S., & McNamara, N. (2013). Sustainable livelihood approach. [electronic resource]: a critique of theory and practice: Dordrecht; New York: Springer, c2013.
Minato, Curtis, & Allan. (2012). Understanding the role and influence of social norms: lessons for NRM. Local Environment, 17(8), 863-877. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2012.714758
Murugani, V. G., & Thamaga-Chitja, J. M. (2018). Livelihood assets and institutions for smallholder irrigation farmer market access in Limpopo, South Africa. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 34(2), 259-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2017.1301249
Neilson, J., & Shonk, F. (2014). Chained to Development? Livelihoods and global value chains in the coffee-producing Toraja region of Indonesia. Australian Geographer, 45(3), 269-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2014.929998
Pandey, R., Jha, S. K., Alatalo, J. M., Archie, K. M., & Gupta, A. K. (2017). Sustainable livelihood framework-based indicators for assessing climate change vulnerability and adaptation for Himalayan communities. Ecological Indicators, 79, 338-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.047
Pour, M. D., Barati, A. A., Azadi, H., & Scheffran, J. (2018). Revealing the role of livelihood assets in livelihood strategies: Towards enhancing conservation and livelihood development in the Hara Biosphere Reserve, Iran. Ecological Indicators, 94, 336-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.074
Priyanti, A., Hanifah, V. W., Mahendri, I., Cahyadi, F., & Cramb, R. A. (2012). Small-scale beef cattle production in East Java, Indonesia. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society annual conference’.(AARES: Fremantle, WA).
Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis. IDS Working paper.
Scoones, I. (2009). Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(1), 171-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150902820503
Stoian, D., Donovan, J., Fisk, J., & Muldoon, M. (2012). Value chain development for rural poverty reduction: a reality check and a warning. Enterprise Development and Microfinance, 23(1), 54-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.3362/1755-1986.2012.006
Stronza, A. L. (2010). Commons management and ecotourism: Ethnographic evidence from the Amazon. International Journal of the Commons, 4(1), 56-77. Retrieved from https://thecommonsjournal.org/articles/10.18352/ijc.137
Tao, T. C., & Wall, G. (2009). A livelihood approach to sustainability. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 14(2), 137-152.
Thennakoon, S. (2004). Rural livelihood strategies and the five capitals: a comparative study in selected villages of Sri Lanka. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 18th European conference on modern South Asian Studies. Lund, Sweden, July.
Turner, S. (2007). Small-Scale Enterprise Livelihoods and Social Capital in Eastern Indonesia: Ethnic Embeddedness and Exclusion. Professional Geographer, 59(4), 407-420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00631.x
Vandamme, E., D’Haese, M., Speelman, S., & D’Haese, D. (2010). Livestock against Risk and Vulnerability: Multifunctionality of Livestock Keeping in Burundi. In F. Swanepoel, A. Stroebel, & S. Moyo (Eds.), The role of livestock in developing communities: Enhancing multifunctionality (Vol. 3, pp. 107). South Africa: The Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA).
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Baiq Yulfia Elsadewi Yanuartati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
