Teachers and Students Needs Analysis for the Development of Subject Specific Pedagogy (SSP) Blended Learning Based on Multiple Representations
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i7.3600Published:
2023-07-25Issue:
Vol. 9 No. 7 (2023): JulyKeywords:
Blended learning, Critical thinking, Multiple representation, Subject specific pedagogyResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This article discusses the needs analysis of the teachers and students towards the development of a multiple-representation-based blended learning Subject Specific Pedagogy (SSP) used in chemistry learning. The subjects of this study consisted of 15 chemistry teachers in Central Java and 34 high school students in class XII IPA. Primary data were obtained by providing teacher questionnaires consisting of the characteristics of reaction rates material, the use of learning media that are usually used, and students' critical thinking skills and learning using SSP blended learning based on multiple representations. While the student questionnaire consists of students' interests and learning methods in understanding chemical material, students' opinions regarding the reaction level material, and students' general critical thinking skills. The results of this need analysis show that teachers and students need integrated learning tools to support learning activities. The conclusion of this study is to develop a multiple-representation-based blended learning Subject Specific Pedagogy (SSP) to improve critical thinking skills and student learning outcomes
References
Afifah, S. N., Mahardiani, L., & Utami, B. (2023). A Content Analysis of Pictorial Material in the Chemistry Textbooks on the Topic Redox Reaction Based on Chemical Representation. JKPK (Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia), 8(1), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.20961/jkpk.v8i1.72885
Anand, AA. (2021). Flipped Pedagogy: Strategies and Technologies in Chemistry Education. Materials Today: Proceedings, 47(1), 240-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.133
Andriani, R., Muhibbudin, Khairil, Safrida, & Pada, A. U. T. (2023). Effect of Implementation of Chat Room-Based Blended Learning on Self-Efficacy and Student Learning Outcomes on Human Movement System Material. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(6), 4535–4543. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.3850
Auliyani, Z. F., Rery, R. U., & Noer, A. M. (2023). The Effect of E-Scaffolding in Guided Inquiry Learning on Concept Understanding in Reaction Rate Material. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(6), 4417-4422. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.3646
Awidi, I. T., & Paynter, M. (2022). An Evaluation of the Impact of Digital Technology Innovations on Students' Learning: Participatory Research Using a Student-Centred Approach. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09619-5
Castro, R. (2019). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Trends and Capabilities. Education and Information Technologies, 24(4), 2523–2546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09886-3
Chowdhury, F. (2020). Blended learning: How to Flip the Classroom at HEIs in Bangladesh? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 13(2), 228-242. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-12-2018-0030
Cosculluela, C. L., Suarez, C., Quiroga, S., Sierra, N. S., Blasco, R. L., & Martinez, A. R. (2021). Flipped Classroom Model Before and During COVID-19: Using Technology to Develop 21st Century Skills. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(2), 189-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2020-0137
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2018). The Use of Mobile Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Computers & Education, 123, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.007
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2008). Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional.
Facione, P. A. (2020). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. California: The California Academic Press.
Ferreira, J. E. V., & Lawrie, G. A. (2019). Profiling the Combinations of Multiple Representations Used in Large-Class Teaching: Pathways to Inclusive Practices. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20, 902-923. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00001A
Fuad, N. M., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Suarsini, E. (2017). Improving Junior High Schools’ Critical Thinking Skills Based on Test Three Different Models of Learning. International Journal of Instruction, 10(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1017a
Lapitan, L. D., Tiangco, C. E., Sumalinog, D. A., Sabarillo, N. S., & Diaz, J. M. (2021). An Effective Blended Online Teaching and Learning Strategy During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Education for Chemical Engineers, 35, 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.01.012
Lestari, D. I., Hasibuan, M. H. E., & Muhammad, D. (2020). The Effect of the Flipped Classroom Approach and Self-Efficacy on a Guided Inquiry on Students' Creative Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 12(2), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v12i2.19435
Lewar, A. K., & Suhartini. (2023). Pengembangan Modul Berbentuk Scrapbook pada Materi Sistem Saraf untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa SMA Kelas XI. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (JPSI), 11(1), 96-112. https://dx.doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v11i1.26980
Maemanah, S., Suryaningsih, S., & Yunita, L. (2019). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Melalui Model Flipped Classroom pada Pembelajaran Kimia Abad ke 21. Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 3(2), 143-154. https://doi.org/10.19109/ojpk.v3i2.4901
Marpaung, N., & Simanjuntak, M. P. (2018). Desain Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dan Multipel Representasi terhadap Hasil Belajar dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Fisika, 6(3), 10-18. Retrieved from https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/inpafi/article/view/11119/9887
Minarni, Afrida, Epinur, & Putri, R. (2022). Improving the Process and Student Learning Outcomes of The Reaction Rate Material with Discovery Learning Model Assisted by Virtual Laboratory. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 6(1), 30-37. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v6i
Muhammad, M. D. P., Ernest, I. Z., Rokhman, M. A. N., Pangastuti, R., Wilujeng, I., & Rejeki, S. (2023). Analysis of Students' Critical Thinking Ability Through Science E-Module Learning Based Google Sites. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9 (6), 4658-4665. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.2793
Paristiowati, M., Nanda, E. V., Hasibuan, N. A. P., & Ilmana, M. Z. (2022). Analysis of Students’ Critical Thinking Skills by Applying Flipped Classroom Learning Model by Using Powtoon Application on the Topic of Salt Hydrolysis. JKPK (Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia), 7(3), 379-393. https://doi.org/10.20961/jkpk.v7i3.67802
Prawita, W., Prayitno, B. A., & Sugiyarto. (2019). Effectiveness of a Generative Learning-Based Biology Module to Improve the Analytical Thinking Skills of the Students with High and Low Reading Motivation. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1459–1476. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12193a
Rushiana, R. A., Sumarna, O., & Anwar, S. (2023). Efforts to Develop Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Chemistry Learning: Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(3), 1425–1435. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i3.2632
Safitri, N. C., Nursa’adah, E., & Wijayanti, I. E. (2019). Analisis Multipel Representasi Kimia Siswa pada Konsep Laju Reaksi. EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan), 4(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.30870/educhemia.v4i1.5023
Saputri, A. C., Sajidan, & Rinanto, Y. (2018). Critical Thinking Skills Profile of Senior High School Students in Biology Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1006, 012002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1006/1/012002
Siahaan, R., Sitorus, M., & Silaban, S. (2021). The Development of Teaching Materials Oriented to Critical Thinking Skills for Chemistry Class XI High School. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 13(1), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v13i1.24145
Sumarmi, Bachri, S., Irawan, L. Y., & Aliman, M. (2021). E-module in Blended Learning: its Impact on Students’ Disaster Preparedness and Innovation in Developing Learning Media. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 187–208. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14412a.
Thonney, T. & Montgomery, J. C. (2019). Defining Critical Thinking Across Disciplines: An Analysis of Community College Faculty Perspectives. College Teaching, 67(3), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2019.1579700
Wardani, D. N., Toenlioe, A. J., & Wedi, A. (2018). Daya Tarik Pembelajaran di Era 21 dengan Blended Learning. Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 1(1), 13-18. Retrieved from http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jktp/article/view/2852/2177
Wijiastuti, D. S., & Muchlis. (2021). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Pogil pada Materi Laju Reaksi untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 10(1), 48-55. https://doi.org/10.26740/ujced.v10n1.p48-55
Author Biographies
Rachma Kharolinasari, Universitas Sebelas Maret
Sri Mulyani, Universitas Sebelas Maret
Elfi Susanti VH, Universitas Sebelas Maret
Nurma Yunita Indriyanti, Universitas Sebelas Maret
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rachma Kharolinasari, Sri Mulyani, Elfi Susanti VH, Nurma Yunita Indriyanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).