The Trend of Technology Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Research in 2012-2022: Contribution to Science Learning of 21st Century

Authors

Bahtiar , Yusuf , Aris Doyan , Ibrahim

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.3685

Published:

2023-05-31

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 5 (2023): May

Keywords:

TPACK, science learning, 21st century

Review

Downloads

How to Cite

Bahtiar, B., Yusuf, Y., Doyan, A. ., & Ibrahim, I. (2023). The Trend of Technology Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Research in 2012-2022: Contribution to Science Learning of 21st Century. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.3685

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

The use of TPACK in 21st Century Science learning can facilitate teachers and students to be more active in learning and make it easier for students to have the expected 21st-century competencies. This study aims to identify and analyze TPACK research trends in 21st-century science learning in the form of TPACK documents, classification of journal rankings, classification of authors and their country of origin, and classification of keywords. This research is qualitative research. The data used in this study were obtained from documents indexed by Google Scholar from 2012-2022 using Publish or Perish and dimension.ai. Research procedures using PRISMA guidelines. Methods of data analysis using bibliometric analysis assisted by VOSviewer software. The results of the analysis show that the trend of writing TPACK articles in 21st Century Science learning has increased significantly from 2016 to 2020. Most journals that contain articles about TPACK in 21st Century Science learning are Educational and Information Technologies and Computers & Education. The results of the density mapping analysis show that the themes that are rarely researched are ICT investigation, curriculum, effectiveness, teacher knowledge, foreign language, teacher education, and TPACK instrument.

References

Akyuz, D. (2018). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through performance assessment. Computers & Education, 125, 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.012

Anthonysamy, L., Koo, A. C., & Hew, S. H. (2020). Self-regulated learning strategies in higher education: Fostering digital literacy for sustainable lifelong learning. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 2393–2414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10134-2

Bahtiar, B. (2018). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Fisika Dasar Berbasis Model Pembelajaran P3e Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Program Studi Tadris Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 4(2), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v4i2.780

Bahtiar, B., & Ibrahim, I. (2022). The Science Literacy Profile Based on Students’ Creative Thinking Skill in the Time of Covid-19 Pandemic Using Blended Learning. International Conference on Madrasah Reform 2021 (ICMR 2021), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220104.016

Bahtiar, B., Ibrahim, I., & Maimun, M. (2022). Profile of Student Problem Solving Skills Using Discovery Learning Model with Cognitive Conflict Approach. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1340–1349. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1657

Bahtiar, B., Ibrahim, I., & Maimun, M. (2022). Analysis of Students' Scientific Literacy Skill in terms of Gender Using Science Teaching Materials Discovery Model Assisted by PhET Simulation. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i3.37279

Baran, E., Canbazoglu Bilici, S., Albayrak Sari, A., & Tondeur, J. (2019). Investigating the impact of teacher education strategies on preservice teachers’ TPACK. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12565

Blau, I., Shamir-Inbal, T., & Avdiel, O. (2020). How does the pedagogical design of a technology-enhanced collaborative academic course promote digital literacies, self-regulation, and perceived learning of students? The Internet and Higher Education, 45, 100722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100722

Butler, K. T., Davies, D. W., Cartwright, H., Isayev, O., & Walsh, A. (2018). Machine learning for molecular and materials science. Nature, 559(7715), 547–555. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0337-2

Caena, F., & Redecker, C. (2019). Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (Digcompedu). European Journal of Education, 54(3), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12345

Chai, C. S., Hwee Ling Koh, J., & Teo, Y. H. (2019). Enhancing and modeling teachers’ design beliefs and efficacy of technological pedagogical content knowledge for 21st century quality learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(2), 360–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117752453

Chandra, Y. (2018). Mapping the evolution of entrepreneurship as a field of research (1990–2013): A scientometric analysis. PloS One, 13(1), e0190228. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190228

Chen, C., & Song, M. (2019). Visualizing a field of research: A methodology of systematic scientometric reviews. PloS One, 14(10), e0223994. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223994

Chuntala, A. D. W. (2019). Saintific approach in 21st century learning in indonesian language learning vocational school of pharmacy. International Journal of Active Learning, 4(2), 71–77. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/ijal/article/view/17181

Cote, T., & Milliner, B. (2018). A Survey of EFL Teachers’digital Literacy: A Report From A Japanese University. Teaching English with Technology, 18(4), 71–89. Retrieved from https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=707768

Dakhi, O., JAMA, J., & IRFAN, D. (2020). Blended learning: A 21st century learning model at college. International Journal Of Multi Science, 1(08), 50–65. Retrieved from https://multisciencejournal.com/index.php/ijm/article/view/92/72

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

de Carvalho, G. D. G., Sokulski, C. C., da Silva, W. V., de Carvalho, H. G., de Moura, R. V., de Francisco, A. C., & Da Veiga, C. P. (2020). Bibliometrics and systematic reviews: A comparison between the Proknow-C and the Methodi Ordinatio. Journal of Informetrics, 14(3), 101043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101043

de Moura Jr, P. J. (2021). Is data science a science? The essence of phenomenon and the role of theory in the emerging field. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-03-2021-0205

Dewi, N. R., Rusilowati, A., Saptono, S., Haryani, S., Wiyanto, W., Ridlo, S., Listiaji, P., & Atunnisa, R. (2021). Technological, Pedagogical, Content Knowledge (TPACK) Research Trends: A Systematic Literature Review of Publications between 2010-2020. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(4), 589–604. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1339464

Doncheva, N. T., Morris, J. H., Gorodkin, J., & Jensen, L. J. (2018). Cytoscape StringApp: Network analysis and visualization of proteomics data. Journal of Proteome Research, 18(2), 623–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.06.041

Dong, Y., Xu, C., Chai, C. S., & Zhai, X. (2020). Exploring the structural relationship among teachers’ technostress, technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), computer self-efficacy and school support. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(2), 147–157. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40299-019-00461-5

Dovlatova, G., Smakhtina, A., Bondarenko, O., Yakunina, I., Tishechenko, I., & Agafonov, A. (2022). International monitoring of institutions in overcoming the resource dependence of the Russian sector of the transport economy. Transportation Research Procedia, 63, 502–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.06.041

Emrouznejad, A., & Yang, G. (2018). A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978–2016. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 61, 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2017.01.008

Farghaly, A. (2018). Comparing and Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research Approaches in Education: The Peculiar Situation of Medical Education. Education in Medicine Journal, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2018.10.1.2

Giraldo, P., Benavente, E., Manzano-Agugliaro, F., & Gimenez, E. (2019). Worldwide research trends on wheat and barley: A bibliometric comparative analysis. Agronomy, 9(7), 352. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/24/9549#

Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Nisyah, M., Kusdiastuti, M., Herayanti, L., & Fathoroni, F. (2020). Enhancement Students’ Problem-Solving Ability through Inquiry Learning Model Integrated with Advance Organizers on the Concept of Work and Energy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1471(1), 012035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1471/1/012035

Hallinger, P., & Chatpinyakoop, C. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on higher education for sustainable development, 1998–2018. Sustainability, 11(8), 2401. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2401#

Hallinger, P., & Nguyen, V.-T. (2020). Mapping the landscape and structure of research on education for sustainable development: A bibliometric review. Sustainability, 12(5), 1947. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1947#

Hanif, M. (2020). The Development and Effectiveness of Motion Graphic Animation Videos to Improve Primary School Students’ Sciences Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 247–266. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1270738

Hanushek, E. A., Piopiunik, M., & Wiederhold, S. (2019). The value of smarter teachers international evidence on teacher cognitive skills and student performance. Journal of Human Resources, 54(4), 857–899. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.54.4.0317.8619R1

Jannah, M., Prasojo, L. D., & Jerusalem, M. A. (2020). Elementary school teachers’ perceptions of digital technologybased learning in the 21st century: Promoting digital technology as the proponent learning tools. Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI, 7(1), 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v7i1.6088

Jdaitawi, M. (2020). Does Flipped Learning Promote Positive Emotions in Science Education? A Comparison between Traditional and Flipped Classroom Approaches. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 18(6), 516–524. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1276387

Kaeophanuek, S., Na-Songkhla, J., & Nilsook, P. (2019). A learning process model to enhance digital literacy using critical inquiry through digital storytelling (CIDST). International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i03.8326

Kaur, S., Kumar, R., Kaur, R., Singh, S., Rani, S., & Kaur, A. (2022). Piezoelectric materials in sensors: Bibliometric and visualization analysis. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.484

Khan, A., Goodell, J. W., Hassan, M. K., & Paltrinieri, A. (2022). A bibliometric review of finance bibliometric papers. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.10252

Lachner, A., Fabian, A., Franke, U., Preiß, J., Jacob, L., Führer, C., Küchler, U., Paravicini, W., Randler, C., & Thomas, P. (2021). Fostering pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A quasi-experimental field study. Computers & Education, 174, 104304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104304

Liao, H., Tang, M., Luo, L., Li, C., Chiclana, F., & Zeng, X.-J. (2018). A bibliometric analysis and visualization of medical big data research. Sustainability, 10(1), 166. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/1/166#

Liza, K., & Andriyanti, E. (2020). Digital Literacy Scale of English Pre-Service Teachers and Their Perceived Readiness toward the Application of Digital Technologies. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 14(1), 74–79. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v14i1.13925

Mishra, P. (2019). Considering contextual knowledge: The TPACK diagram gets an upgrade. In Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education (Vol. 35, Issue 2, pp. 76–78). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1588611

Mutiani, M., Supriatna, N., Abbas, E. W., Rini, T. P. W., & Subiyakto, B. (2021). Technological, pedagogical, content knowledge (TPACK): A discursions in learning innovation on social studies. The Innovation of Social Studies Journal, 2(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.20527/iis.v2i2.3073

Puspitarini, Y. D., & Hanif, M. (2019). Using Learning Media to Increase Learning Motivation in Elementary School. Anatolian Journal of Education, 4(2), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2019.426a

Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guà rdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the Covid-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 923–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y

Reinhardt, J., & Thorne, S. (2019). Digital literacies as emergent multifarious repertoires. Engaging Language Learners through CALL: From Theory and Research to Informed Practice, 208–239. Retrieved from https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/

Silber-Varod, V., Eshet-Alkalai, Y., & Geri, N. (2019). Tracing research trends of 21st-century learning skills. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3099–3118. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12753

Sumardi, L., Rohman, A., & Wahyudiati, D. (2020). Does the Teaching and Learning Process in Primary Schools Correspond to the Characteristics of the 21st Century Learning?. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13325a

Suprapto, N., Sukarmin, S., Puspitawati, R. P., Erman, E., Savitri, D., Ku, C.-H., & Mubarok, H. (2021). Research Trend on TPACK through Bibliometric Analysis (2015-2019). International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(4), 1375–1385. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i4.22062

Surya, A., Poerwanti, J. I. S., & Sriyanto, M. I. (2020). The Effectiveness of the Use of Digital-Based Educational Comic Media in Improving Reading Interest in Elementary School Students. 3rd International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education (ICLIQE 2019), 411–415. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200129.052

Tanak, A. (2020). Designing TPACK-based course for preparing student teachers to teach science with technological pedagogical content knowledge. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 41(1), 53–59. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/kjss/article/view/234891/161505

Taopan, L. L., Drajati, N. A., & Sumardi, S. (2020). TPACK framework: Challenges and opportunities in efL classrooms. Research and Innovation in Language Learning, 3(1), 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/rill.v3i1.2763

Tohara, A. J. T. (2021). Exploring Digital Literacy Strategies for Students with Special Educational Needs in the Digital Age. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(9), 3345–3358. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i9.5741

Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2020). Enhancing pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A mixed-method study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 319–343. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11423-019-09692-1

Tseng, J.-J., Chai, C. S., Tan, L., & Park, M. (2020). A critical review of research on technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in language teaching. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1868531

van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J., van Dijk, J. A., & de Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-century skills and 21st-century digital skills for workers: A systematic literature review. Sage Open, 10(1), 2158244019900176. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2158244019900176

Vapniarchuk, V. V., Kaplina, O. V., Shumylo, M. Y., & Tumanyanc, A. R. (2021). Proof in the Science of the Criminal Process in Ukraine: Conceptual Approaches to Understanding the Essence. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 65(2–3), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X20946924

Wang, W., Schmidt-Crawford, D., & Jin, Y. (2018). Preservice teachers’ TPACK development: A review of literature. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(4), 234–258. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/86363

Wang, Y., Lavonen, J., & Tirri, K. (2018). Aims for learning 21st century competencies in national primary science curricula in China and Finland. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/86363

Wen, Q.-J., Ren, Z.-J., Lu, H., & Wu, J.-F. (2021). The progress and trend of BIM research: A bibliometrics-based visualization analysis. Automation in Construction, 124, 103558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103558

Wrahatnolo, T. (2018). 21st centuries skill implication on educational system. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 296(1), 012036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/296/1/012036

Rahayu, Y. S. (2018). Developing Learning Model P3E to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Skills of Islamic Senior High School. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 947(1), 012067. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012067

Zou, D., Huang, X., Kohnke, L., Chen, X., Cheng, G., & Xie, H. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of the trends and research topics of empirical research on TPACK. Education and Information Technologies, 1–25.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00135.x

Author Biographies

Bahtiar, Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Departement of Physics Education

Yusuf, Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Aris Doyan, University of Mataram

Ibrahim, University of Mataram

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Bahtiar, Yusuf, Aris Doyan, Ibrahim

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).