The Practicality and Effectiveness of the Physics Independent Learning (PIL) Model Toolkit in Online Tutorials to Improve Physics Independent Learning Skills and Physics Problem-Solving Skills

Authors

Paken Pandiangan

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.3711

Published:

2023-05-31

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 5 (2023): May

Keywords:

Distance learning, Independent learning skills, Physics problem solving skills, PIL model, Quantum physics

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Pandiangan, P. (2023). The Practicality and Effectiveness of the Physics Independent Learning (PIL) Model Toolkit in Online Tutorials to Improve Physics Independent Learning Skills and Physics Problem-Solving Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 4008–4014. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.3711
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the practicality and effectiveness of the PIL model tool in online tutorials to improve self-learning and problem-solving skills in DL physics students in introductory quantum physics courses. This type of research is educational development research with a sample of 75 undergraduate physics education students at Universitas Terbuka in Indonesia. This research was carried out in three stages, namely preliminary and development studies, limited trials, and extensive trials. The results showed that tutors could carry out all stages of online tutorial activities using the PIL model very well with the percentage of implementation of syntax, social systems, and reaction principles. There was an increase in students' problem-solving abilities and independent learning abilities in each class after taking PIL with high N-gain categories. It can be concluded that the PIL model set is valid, practical, and effectively applied to improve problem solving skills and students' independent skills in learning Introduction to Quantum Physics.

References

Bao, L., & Koenig, K. (2019). Physics education research for 21st century learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0007-8

Barbieri, C. A., Booth, J. L., & Chawla, K. (2023). Let’s be rational: worked examples supplemented textbooks improve conceptual and fraction knowledge. Educational Psychology, 43(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2022.2144142

Bhandari, B., Chopra, D., & Singh, K. (2020). Self-directed learning: assessment of students’ abilities and their perspective. Advances in physiology education, 44(3), 383-386. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00010.2020

Brockett, R. G., & Hiemstra, R. (2018). Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429457319

Budiastra, A. K., Wicaksono, I., & Erlina, N. (2022). The effect of science kit and supervision models on the implementation and implications on the evaluation of science practicum distance learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(5), 2443-2450. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i5.1610

Bungum, B., Bøe, M. V., & Henriksen, E. K. (2018). Quantum talk: How small-group discussions may enhance students’ understanding in quantum physics. Science Education, 102(4), 856–877. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21447

Caena, F., & Redecker, C. (2019). Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (Digcompedu). European Journal of Education, 54(3), 356-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12345

Engeness, I. (2021). Developing teachers’ digital identity: towards the pedagogic design principles of digital environments to enhance students’ learning in the 21st century. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), 96-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1849129

Eveline, E., Wilujeng, I., & Kuswanto, H. (2019, June). The effect of scaffolding approach assisted by PhET simulation on students’ conceptual understanding and students’ learning independence in Physics. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1233, No. 1, p. 012036). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012036

Fajriah, Y. N., & Septiyanti, S. N. A. (2021). The challenges encountered by EFL teachers in developing students’ 4c skills in 21st-Century education. JEPAL (Journal of English Pedagogy and Applied Linguistics), 1(2), 106-121. https://doi.org/10.32627/jepal.v1i2.38

Fandiño, F. G. E., & Velandia, A. J. S. (2020). How an online tutor motivates E-learning English. Heliyon, 6(8), e04630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04630

Geng, S., Law, K. M., & Niu, B. (2019). Investigating self-directed learning and technology readiness in blending learning environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0147-0

Gündüzalp, S. (2021). 21 st century skills for sustainable education: Prediction level of teachers’ information literacy skills on their digital literacy skills. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 12(1), 85-101. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2021-0007

Hursen, C. (2021). The effect of problem-based learning method supported by web 2.0 tools on academic achievement and critical thinking skills in teacher education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26, 515-533. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10758-020-09458-2

Keebaugh, C., Marshman, E., & Singh, C. (2019). Improving student understanding of corrections to the energy spectrum of the hydrogen atom for the Zeeman effect. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1), 010113.1-010113.14. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010113

Laloë, Franck. Do we really understand quantum mechanics?. Cambridge University Press, 2019. Retrieved from http://webéducation.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Franck-Laloe-Do-We-Really-Understand-Quantum-Mechanics_-Cambridge-University-Press-2019.pdf

Lee, H., & Choi, H. S. (2022). Independent self-concept promotes group creativity in a collectivistic cultural context only when the group norm supports collectivism. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 26(1), 71-84. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/gdn0000129

Loeng, S. (2020). Self-directed learning: A core concept in adult education. Education Research International, 2020, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3816132

Nadya, N., & Sari, D. (2021). Analysis of Distance Learning (PJJ) in PGSD Umsu Students. EJoES (Educational Journal of Elementary School), 2(1), 13-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.30596%2Fejoes.v2i1.6612

Pandiangan, P., Sanjaya, M., Gusti, I., & Jatmiko, B. (2017). The validity and effectiveness of physics independent learning model to improve physics problem solving and self-directed learning skills of students in open and distance education systems. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(5). 651-665. http://dx.doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.651

Pandiangan, P. (2022). The Validity and Practicality of The PEPSA Teaching Model to Improve Critical Thinking Skills through Online Tutorials in Open and Distance Education. International Journal on Research in STEM Education, 4(1), 39-54. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijrse.v4i1.930

Pandiangan, P. (2023). The Power of the Physics Independent Learning Model Instrument in Online Tutorials to Enhance Independent Learning Skills and Critical Thinking Skills. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 10(4), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.104.14564

Kemdikbud No.73. (2013). Application of the Indonesian national qualification’s framework. Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia. Retrieved from http://kkni.kemdikbud.go.id/asset/pdf/permendikbud_no_73_tahun_2013.pdf

Robinson, J. D., & Persky, A. M. (2020). Developing self-directed learners. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(3), 292-296. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe847512

Ross, B. H. (2007). Cognitive science: problem solving and learning for physics education. Physics Education Research, 951, 11-18.

Schweder, S. (2020). Mastery goals, positive emotions and learning behavior in self-directed vs. teacher-directed learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 35(1), 205-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00421-z

Sedikides, C. (2021). Self-construction, self-protection, and self-enhancement: A homeostatic model of identity protection. Psychological Inquiry, 32(4), 197-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2021.2004812

Shahroom, A. A., & Hussin, N. (2018). Industrial revolution 4.0 and education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(9), 314-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i9/4593

Singh, C., Maries, A., Heller, K., & Heller, P. (2023). Instructional strategies that foster effective problem-solving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.05585. https://doi.org/10.1063/9780735425477_017

Sun, Z., Xie, K., & Anderman, L. H. (2018). The role of self-regulated learning in students' success in flipped undergraduate math courses. The internet and higher education, 36, 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.09.003

Syaharuddin, S., Mutiani, M., Handy, M. R. N., Abbas, E. W., & Jumriani, J. (2022). Putting transformative learning in higher education based on linking capital. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 16(1), 58-64. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v16i1.20373

Umaralieva, M. (2021). Some challenges in encouraging independent learning. Academic research in educational sciences, 2(4), 1878-1882. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/some-challenges-in-encouraging-independent-learning

Viberg, O., Grönlund, Å., & Andersson, A. (2023). Integrating digital technology in mathematics education: a Swedish case study. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 232-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12818

Wong, J., Baars, M., Davis, D., Van Der Zee, T., Houben, G. J., & Paas, F. (2019). Supporting self-regulated learning in online learning environments and MOOCs: A systematic review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(4-5), 356-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1543084

Yang, F., & Gu, S. (2021). Industry 4.0, a revolution that requires technology and national strategies. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 7(3), 1311-1325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-020-00267-9

Author Biography

Paken Pandiangan, Universitas Terbuka

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Paken Pandiangan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).