Students' Mental Model Profiles on Chemical Bonding Concept Using a Two-Tier Mental Model Diagnostic Test (TDM-Two-Tier)
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.3811Published:
2023-11-25Issue:
Vol. 9 No. 11 (2023): NovemberKeywords:
chemical bonding concept, mental model profiles, two-tier diagnostic testResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This study aims to analyze students' mental models on the concept of chemical bonds using a two-tier mental model diagnostic test. A test with the first tier asking the content and the second tier asking the reasons for the answers at the first tier. The test used has been developed and declared valid with a degree of reliability 0.751. This research is qualitative research with a case study design. Students' mental models are categorized into complete mental models, partial mental models, mental models with misconceptions, and mental models with inconsistencies. In the concept of chemical bonds found 17, 9, 15, and 59% of students with complete, partial, misconceptions, and inconsistencies in mental models respectively. Most students have misconceptions by stating that ionic bonds are formed through atomization and the formation of bonding electrons by reason of the sharing of electrons in ionic crystals. In addition, students understand that the process of forming covalent bonds in oxygen and fluorine occurs because of the attraction between atoms which is greater than the repulsion between bonded atoms. Among the inconsistent concepts found are students explaining the phenomenon of solubility, boiling point, and melting point based on the concept of the electron cloud.
References
Adodo, S. O. (2013). Effects of Two-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Assessment Items on Students’ Learning Outcome in Basic Science Technology (BST. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(2), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.5901/ajis.2013.v2n2p201
Andriani, Y., Mulyani, S., & Wiji, W. (2021). Misconceptions and troublesome knowledge on chemical equilibrium. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012184
Barke, H. D., Hazari, A., & Yitbarek, S. (2008). Misconceptions in Chemistry. Springer.
Coll, R. K., & Taylor, N. (2002). Mental Models in Chemistry: Senior Chemistry Students Mental Models of Chemical Bonding. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 3(2), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1039/b2rp90014a
Damanhuri, M. I. M., Treagust, D. F., Won, M., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2016). High school students’ understanding of acid-base concepts: An ongoing challenge for teachers. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2015.284a
Delisma, D., Wiji, & Widhiyanti, T. (2020). Conception, threshold concept, and troublesome knowledge in redox reaction. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042070
Hunter, K. H., Rodriguez, J. M. G., & Becker, N. M. (2022). A review of research on the teaching and learning of chemical bonding. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(7), 2451–2464. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00034
Johnstone, A. H. (2000). Teaching of Chemistry - Logical or Psychological? Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 1(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1039/a9rp90001b
Kurnaz, M. A., & Emen, A. Y. (2014). Mental Models of the High School Students Related To the Contraction of Matter. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 7(1), 59–67. Retrieved from https://soeagra.com/ijert/ijertmarch2013/1.pdf
Meltafina, M., Wiji, W., & Mulyani, S. (2019). Misconceptions and threshold concepts in chemical bonding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042030
Mulyani, S., Yuliani, G., & Rudina Okvasari, D. (2016). Tes Diagnostik Model Mental Tipe Pilihan Ganda Multi Tingkat Pada Materi Koloid (Tdm-Pmt- Koloid). Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Paedagogia, 19(1), 29–37. Retrieved from https://www.neliti.com/id/publications/155642/tes-diagnostik-model-mental-tipe-pilihan-ganda-multi-tingkat-pada-materi-koloid
Mutlu, A., & Şeşen, B. A. (2016). Evaluating of preservice science teachers’ understanding DF general chemistry cdncepts by using twd tier diagnostic test. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.79
Nordholm, S., & Bacskay, G. B. (2020). The basics of covalent bonding in terms of energy and dynamics. Molecules, 25(11), 2667. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25112667
Pagán, B. (2006). Positive Contributions of Constructivism to Educational Design. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v2i1.318
Park, E. J. (2015). Impact of teachers’ overcoming experience of threshold concepts in chemistry on pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) development. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 59(4), 308–319. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2015.59.4.308
Pérez, J. R. B., Pérez, M. E. B., Calatayud, M. L., & Sabater, J. V. (2017). Student ’ s Misconceptions on Chemical Bonding : A Comparative Study between High School and First Year University Students (Vol. 05, Issue 01, pp. 1–15). https://doi.org/https://www.ajouronline.com/
Rahmawati, Y., Widhiyanti, T., & Mardiah, A. (2019). Analisis Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Calon Guru Kimia Pada Konsep Particulate of Matter. JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya), 4(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v4i2.4824
Sen, S., & Yilmaz, A. (2017). The development of a three-tier chemical bonding concept test. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(1), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10193a
Taber, K. (1998). An alternative conceptual framework from chemistry education An alternative conceptual framework from chemistry education. International Journal of Science Education, 20(5), 597–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200507
Talanquer, V. (2015). Threshold concepts in chemistry: The critical role of implicit schemas. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500679k
Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069880100204
Tsui, C. Y., & Treagust, D. (2010). Evaluating secondary students’ scientific reasoning in genetics using a two-tier diagnostic instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1073–1098. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902951429
Tuysuz, C. (2009). Development of two-tier diagnostic instrument and assess students’ understanding in chemistry. Scientific Research and Essays, 4(6), 626–631. https://doi.org/https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/handle/10355/4829
Ulfa, A. M., Wiji, W., & Mulyani, S. (2020). Conception, threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge in chemical reactions topic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042068
Vrabec, M., & Prokša, M. (2016). Identifying Misconceptions Related to Chemical Bonding Concepts in the Slovak School System Using the Bonding Representations Inventory as a Diagnostic Tool. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(8), 1364–1370. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00953
Wang, C.-Y. (2007). The role of mental-modeling ability, content knowledge, and mental models in general chemistry students’ understanding about molecular polarity. In Disertasi (Vol. 70, Issues 3-A). University of Missouri, Columbia.
Wiji, W., Widhiyanti, T., Delisma, D., & Mulyani, S. R. I. (2021). The Intertextuality Study of the Conception, Threshold Concept, and Troublesome Knowledge on Redox Reaction. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 16(2), 1356–1369. Retrieved from https://jestec.taylors.edu.my/Vol%2016%20issue%202%20April%202021/16_2_33.pdf
Yildirir, H. E., & Demirkol, H. (2018). Identifying mental models of students for physical and chemical change. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(6), 986–1004. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.986
Zohar, A. R., & Levy, S. T. (2019). Attraction vs. repulsion–learning about forces and energy in chemical bonding with the ELI-Chem simulation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(4), 667–684. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00007K
Zwyssig, A. (2023). Diagnosing and Promoting the Understanding of Chemical Bonding [ETH Zurich]. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000615623
Author Biographies
Dian Hasanah, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Wiji Wiji, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Sri Mulyani, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Tuszie Widhiyanti, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Dian Hasanah, Wiji Wiji, Sri Mulyani, Tuszie Widhiyanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
