The Development of A Web-Based Independent Learning Platform using SECI Model

Authors

Fitrah Izul Falaq , Dedi Kuswandi , Henry Praherdhiono

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i7.3921

Published:

2023-07-25

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 7 (2023): July

Keywords:

Knowledge management, Personalized learning, Progressive web learning, SECI model, Training

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Falaq, F. I. ., Kuswandi, D. ., & Praherdhiono, H. . (2023). The Development of A Web-Based Independent Learning Platform using SECI Model. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(7), 4948–4955. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i7.3921

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

The limitation of time, cost, and manpower have been the main problems in facilitating post-training learning. Based on this issue, the research aims to develop a web-based learning platform based on knowledge management system as a learning supplement for independent post-training learning. The development of the application adopted the SECI model which stands for Socialization, Externalization, Combination, and Internalization. The system will record data used as an indicator for making decisions on the material and giving automatic recommendations for each participant. The methodology used in this study is a model proposed by Davidson-Shiver, Rasmussen, dan Lowenthal that consists of Analysis; Evaluation Planning; Concurrent Design which includes design, development, initial implementation, and formative evaluation; Full Implementation; and Summative Evaluation and Research. There are 2 data analysis techniques, qualitative data analysis to measure the accuracy of utilization procedures; and quantitative data analysis to measure technical quality in the form of media validity and learning outcomes. Based on the material expert validation, the material obtained a percentage of 98.75% which is very feasible; media expert validation gained a percentage of 81.25% with a very feasible category; small group trials obtained a percentage of 81.5% in the very feasible category; and product testing obtained a percentage of 87.125%. The results of pre-test and post-test data processing showed an average increase in learning outcomes of 41.53%, with a completeness level of learning outcomes at 90% in the very effective category. As a result, the data inferred that the media is very decent and effective to be used as a supplement for independent post-training learning.

References

Abubakar, A. M., Elrehail, H., Alatailat, M. A., & Elçi, A. (2019). Knowledge Management, Decision-Making Style and Organizational Performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(2), 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.07.003

Agrawal, A., & Mukti, S. K. (2020). Knowledge Management & It’s Origin, Success Factors, Planning, Tools, Applications, Barriers and Enablers: A Review. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(1), 43–82. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJKM.2020010103

Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Astorga-Vargas, M. A., Flores-Rios, B. L., Licea-Sandoval, G., & Gonzalez-Navarro, F. F. (2017). Explicit and Tacit Knowledge Conversion Effects, in Software Engineering Undergraduate Students. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 15(3), 336–345. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41275-017-0065-7

Bratianu, C. (2021). Exploring The Knowledge Management Impact on Business Education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042313

Clarke, J., & Miles, S. (2003). Changing Systems to Personalize Learning: Introduction to The Personalization Workshops. Providence, Rhode Island: The Education Alliance at Brown University. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED482970

Davidson-Shivers, G. V., Rasmussen, K. L., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2018). Web-Based Learning Design, Implementation and Evaluation (Second Edition). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Dneprovskaya, N. V, Komleva, N. V, & Urintsov, A. I. (2020). The Knowledge Management Approach to Digitalization of Smart Education. Advances in Artificial Systems for Medicine and Education II, 641–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12082-5

Drucker, P. (1993). Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, Inc.

Estes, C. A. (2004). Promoting Student Centered Learning in Experiental Education. Journal of Experiental Education, 27(2), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590402700203

Frolova, Y., Alwaely, S. A., & Nikishina, O. (2021). Knowledge Management in Entrepreneurship Education as The Basis for Creative Business Development. Sustainability, 13(1167). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031167

Gao, Y., Liu, T.-C., & Paas, F. (2015). Effects of Mode of Target Task Selection on Learning About Plants in a Mobile Learning Environment: Effortful Manual Selection Versus Effortless QR-Code Selection. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(5), 694–704. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000080

Ishak, R., & Mansor, M. (2020). The Relationship between Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning with Academic Staff Readiness for Education 4.0. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2020(85), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2020.85.8

Khatun, A., George, B., & Dar, S. N. (2021). Knowledge Management Practices in The Higher Education Sector with Special Reference to Business Schools. Education and Self Development, 16(2), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.16.2.04

Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. https://doi.org/doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14

Quarchioni, S., Paternostro, S., & Trovarelli, F. (2020). Knowledge Management in Higher Education: A Literature Review and Further Research Avenues. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2020.1730717

Reni, Y. M., Kuswandi, D., & Sihkabuden, S. (2017). Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran dan Self Regulated Learning terhadap Hasil Belajar. JINOTEP: Jurnal Inovasi dan Teknologi Pembelajaran, 4(1), 47–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um031v4i12017p047

Rustandi, R. (2019). Kinerja Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia di Era Disrupsi. Kebijakan: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, 10(2), 72-80. https://doi.org/10.23969/kebijakan.v10i2.1653

Sahabudin, N. A., & Ali, M. B. (2013). Personalized Learning and Learning Style among Upper Secondary School Students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 710–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.391

Salleh, K. (2010). E-Learning, Knowledge Management and Learning Organization: An Integrative Perspective. 5th International Conference on e-Learning (ICEL), Penang, Malaysia, 343-349. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276279891

Siahaan, S. (2003). E-Learning (Pembelajaran Elektronik) sebagai Salah Satu Alternatif Kegiatan Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 9(42), 303-321. Retrieved from https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail.jsp?id=64803

Silamut, A., & Petsangsri, S. (2020). Self-Directed Learning with Knowledge Management Model to Enhance Digital Literacy Abilities. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 4797–4815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10187-3

Suroso, J. S., & Sasmoko, E. (2017). The Impact on Knowledge Management System’s Element to The Performance in Higher Education. Proceedings-2017 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET), 180–183. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET.2017.49

Zhang, L., Basham, J. D., & Yang, S. (2020). Understanding The Implementation of Personalized Learning: A Research Synthesis. Educational Research Review, 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100339

Author Biographies

Fitrah Izul Falaq, Universitas Negeri Malang

Dedi Kuswandi, Universitas Negeri Malang

Henry Praherdhiono, Universitas Negeri Malang

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Fitrah Izul Falaq, Dedi Kuswandi, Henry Praherdhiono

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).