The Effectiveness of Indonesian Education Curriculum Reform on the Quality of Processes in Learning
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.3930Published:
2023-01-31Downloads
Abstract
UU no. 20 of 2003 aims to develop the potential of students in spiritual strength, noble character, intelligence, self-control, and the skills needed. To achieve this national education goal, the Government always seeks to improve the quality of education through educational curriculum reform, with the aim of improving and developing the previous curriculum. This can be seen from the frequent curriculum changes in Indonesia since 1947, 1964, 1968, 1973, 1975, 1984, 1994, 1997, 2004, 2006, 2013 curriculum, until now the era of the industrial revolution 5.0 is known as the independent curriculum. However, curriculum reform often creates problems among the school community and the general public. The problems that arise are how it is implemented and the reasons behind the curriculum change, and whether curriculum reform has an effect on the quality of learning? The quality of education and learning must be aligned with the process standards in article (1) of Government Regulation No. 19 of 2005 concerning National Standards Education that must be developed in the implementation of learning in educational units to achieve competence. To achieve learning competencies in the 5.0 industrial revolution era, 21st century skills are needed, namely critical thinking skills, communication skills. creativity and innovation, capable of collaboration. In addition, so that learning objectives can improve the quality of learning, attitudes and abilities must be possessed: mastering the current curriculum and learning tools, mastering material in the field of study, mastering assessment methods and techniques, commitment or love of the teacher to the task, and discipline
Keywords:
Curriculum Education Indonesia Quality LearningReferences
Alam, A. (2022). Investigating sustainable education and positive psychology interventions in schools towards achievement of sustainable happiness and wellbeing for 21st century pedagogy and curriculum. ECS Transactions, 107(1), 19481. https://doi.org/10.1149/10701.19481ecst
Alhamuddin, A. (2014). Sejarah Kurikulum di Indonesia (Studi Analisis Kebijakan Pengembangan Kurikulum). Nur El-Islam, 1(2), 48–58. https://www.neliti.com/publications/226468/sejarah-kurikulum-di-indonesia-studi-analisis-kebijakan-pengembangan-kurikulum#cite
Aprilia, W. (2020). Organisasi dan Desain Pengembangan Kurikulum. Islamika, 2(2), 208–226. https://doi.org/10.36088/islamika.v2i2.711
Arifin, Z. (2009). Evaluasi pembelajaran (Vol. 8). Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian: suatu pendekatan praktik. PT Rineka Cipta.
Hapsari, F. (2014). Efektifitas Perubahan Kurikulum Terhadap Kegiatan Pembelajaran Di Sekolah (Studi Kasus Pada Sdn 03 Pagi Ciracas). Research and Development Journal of Education, 1(1). https://journal.lppmunindra.ac.id/index.php/RDJE/article/download/1376/1098
Harun, S. (2022). Pembelajaran di era 5.0. PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL PENDIDIKAN DASAR. http://ejurnal.pps.ung.ac.id/index.php/PSNPD/article/view/1074
Herlina, H. (2018). Urgensi Desain Kurikulum dalam Upaya Memajukan Pendidikan Di Indonesia. Ngabari: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Sosial, 11(1), 1–15. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=id&user=kj3j7dgAAAAJ&citation_for_view=kj3j7dgAAAAJ:PVgj2kMGcgYC
Morelent, Y., & Syofiani. (2015). Pengaruh Penerapan Kurikulum 2013 Terhadap Pembentukan Karakter Siswa Sekolah Dasar Negeri 05 Percobaan Pintu Kabun Bukittinggi. Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(2), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.22202/jg.2015.v1i2.1234
Muhammedi, M. (2016). Perubahan Kurikulum Di Indonesia: Studi kritis tentang upaya menemukan Kurikulum Pendidikan islam yang ideal. Jurnal Raudhah, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.30829/raudhah.v4i1.61
Mukhlasin, A., & Wibowo, R. (2018). Desain Pengembangan Kurikulum Integratif dan Implementasinya dalam Pembelajaran. Jurnal Tawadhu, 2(1), 364–380. https://ejournal.iaiig.ac.id/index.php/TWD/article/view/71
Muleya, G. (2020). Curriculum policy and practice of civic education in Zambia: A reflective perspective. The Palgrave Handbook of Citizenship and Education, 185–194. 10.1007/978-3-319-67828-3_53
Munajim, A., Barnawi, B., & Fikriyah, F. (2020). Pengembangan Kurikulum Pembelajaran di masa darurat. DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik, 4(2), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.20961/jdc.v4i2.45288.
Musyarapah, M. (2014). Manajemen Proses Pengembangan Kurikulum (Need Assesment dan Pengembangan Desain Kurikulum). AL-RISALAH, 10(2), 227–240. https://jurnal.stairakha-amuntai.ac.id/index.php/alris/article/view/23
Renzulli, J. (2023). The multiple menu model: A practical guide for developing differentiated curriculum. Taylor & Francis.
Rosmana, P. S., Iskandar, S., Fauziah, H., Azzifah, N., & Khamelia, W. (2022). Kebebasan dalam kurikulum prototype. AS-SABIQUN, 4(1), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.36088/assabiqun.v4i1.1683
Setyosari, H. P. (2016). Metode penelitian pendidikan & pengembangan. Prenada Media.
Simanjuntak, M. B. (2020). The effects of integration between kurikulum 2013 and cambridge curriculum in English (Study case taken from saint peter’s junior high school). Journal Of Advanced English Studies, 3(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.47354/jaes.v3i1.77
Simanjuntak, M. B., Suseno, M., Setiadi, S., Lustyantie, N., & Barus, I. R. G. R. G. (2022). Integration of Curricula (Curriculum 2013 and Cambridge Curriculum for Junior High School Level in Three Subjects) in Pandemic Situation. Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Budaya, 8(1), 77–86. https://jurnal.ideaspublishing.co.id/index.php/ideas/article/view/615
Soviany, P., Ionescu, R. T., Rota, P., & Sebe, N. (2022). Curriculum learning: A survey. International Journal of Computer Vision, 130(6), 1526–1565.
Sugiana, A. (2018). Proses pengembangan organisasi kurikulum dalam meningkatkan pendidikan di indonesia. PEDAGOGIK: Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(2), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.33650/pjp.v5i2.392
Tabroni, T. (2015). Upaya Menyiapkan Pendidikan Yang Berkualitas. https://demo.dspacedirect.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/62a7c050-db0e-41ff-adea-1d0d2e5d39a2/content
Tampubolon, R., Gulo, Y., & Nababan, R. (2022). Pengaruh Reformasi Kurikulum Pendidikan Indonesia Tehadap Kualitas Pembelajaran. Jurnal Darma Agung, 30(2), 389–395. https://doi.org/10.46930/ojsuda.v30i2.1748
Tilaar, H. A. R. (2000). Paradigma baru pendidikan nasional. Rineka Cipta.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons.
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Hetty M Pakpahan, Suherni, Lilis Pujiati, Rostiodertina Girsang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
