Analysis of Changes in Students' Science Literacy Ability in Class V Elementary School Science Learning Using the RADEC Model
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v10i2.3952Published:
2024-02-25Issue:
Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): FebruaryKeywords:
RADEC, Science learning, Science literacy, StackingResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the literacy skills of fifth-grade elementary school students in science subjects with homogeneous and heterogeneous substances using the RADEC model (Read, Answer, Discuss, Explain, and Create). Experimental research with this type of quasi-experimental design is a quantitative study with two groups: the experimental and control classes. In the experimental class, there were 23 students in the sample, and in the control class, there were 18 students. Data sources used in this study was 16 multiple-choice questions on scientific literacy in science learning. Data were obtained from scientific literacy tests; then, analyzed using the Winstep application with Rasch modeling to obtain information about changes in scientific literacy skills in science learning. The research results were processed using the Winstep Rasch model using stacking analysis in the experimental and control classes. The experimental class, stacking analysis results, provide information that it has increased and is grouped based on the increase in logit value into the very good category 87%, 9% good, and 4% sufficient. In the control class, the logit value was very good, 61% and 39% sufficient. Based on research that has been conducted, it can be concluded that the radec learning model can improve the scientific literacy skills of grade 5 students in science learning.
References
Ali, L. U. (2018). Pengelolaan Pembelajaran IPA Ditinjau Dari Hakikat Sains Pada SMP Di Kabupaten Lombok Timur. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 6(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v6i2.1020
Ardiyanti, D. (2017). Aplikasi Model Rasch pada Pengembangan Skala Efikasi Diri dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Karir Siswa. Jurnal Psikologi, 43(3), 248. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.17801
Boone, W. J., & Staver, J. R. (2020). Advances in Rasch Analyses in the Human Sciences (3rd ed.). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43420-5
Chae, S., Park, E.-Y., & Choi, Y.-I. (2018). The psychometric properties of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) in children with cerebral palsy. BMC Neurology, 18(1), 151. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-018-1154-9
Guo, J., & Huang, J. (2021). Information literacy education during the pandemic: The cases of academic libraries in Chinese top universities. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(4), 102363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102363
Hewi, L., & Shaleh, M. (2020). Refleksi Hasil PISA (The Programme For International Student Assesment): Upaya Perbaikan Bertumpu Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini). Jurnal Golden Age, 4(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.29408/jga.v4i01.2018
Laliyo, L. A. R., Sumintono, B., & Panigoro, C. (2022). Measuring changes in hydrolysis concept of students taught by inquiry model: stacking and racking analysis techniques in Rasch model. Heliyon, 8(3), e09126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09126
Lamnina, M., & Chase, C. C. (2019). Developing a thirst for knowledge: How uncertainty in the classroom influences curiosity, affect, learning, and transfer. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59, 101785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101785
Linacre, J. M. (2021). A User’s guide to WINSTEPS MINISTEP rasch-model computerprograms (3.91. 0)(2006). Rasch-Model Computer Programs.
Lindholm, M. (2018). Promoting Curiosity? Science & Education, 27(9–10), 987–1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-0015-7
Nuraeni, A., Sugiharto, F., Anna, A., Sari, E., Mirwanti, R., Trisyani, Y., & Emaliyawati, E. (2023). Self-Efficacy in Self-Care and Its Related Factors Among Patients with Coronary Heart Disease in Indonesia: A Rasch Analysis. Vascular Health and Risk Management, Volume 19(01), 583–593. https://doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S427488
Park, J.-Y., & Park, E.-Y. (2019). The Rasch Analysis of Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(September), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01992
Pratama, Y. A., Sopandi, W., Hidayah, Y., & Trihatusti, M. (2020). Pengaruh model pembelajaran RADEC terhadap keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa sekolah dasar. JINoP (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran), 6(2), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.22219/jinop.v6i2.12653
Rindiana, T., Arifin, M. H., & Wahyuningsih, Y. (2022). Model Pembelajaran Radec untuk Meningkatkan Higher Order Thingking Skill Dalam Pembelajaran IPS di Sekolah Dasar. Autentik : Jurnal Pengembangan Pendidikan Dasar, 6(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.36379/autentik.v6i1.186
Rusdi, A. I., Wibowo, E. W., & Mastoah, I. (2020). The Effectiveness of Using Matrix Book Media (Strimin) in an Objective Test of Student Writing Skills (Quasi Experiment at SDN Manis Jaya. Journal of Basic Education, 7(2), 89–104. Retrieved from http://jurnal.uinbanten.ac.id/index.php/ibtidai/
Rusydiyah, E. F., Indarwati, D., Jazil, S., Susilawati, S., & Gusniwati, G. (2021). STEM Learning Environment: Perceptions and Implementation Skills in Prospective Science Teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(1), 138–148. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i1.28303
Sanjaya, W. (2015). Perencanaan dan Desain Sistem Pembelajaran. Kencana Prenadamedia Group.
Sheeba, M. N. (2013). An Anatomy of Science Process Skills In The Light Of The Challenges to Realize Science Instruction Leading To Global Excellence in Education. Educationa Confab, 2(4), 108–123. Retrieved from https://rb.gy/4z86lv
Sholihin, M., Sari, R. C., Yuniarti, N., & Ilyana, S. (2020). A new way of teaching business ethics: The evaluation of virtual reality-based learning media. The International Journal of Management Education, 18(3), 100428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100428
Sopandi, W. (2019). Sosialisasi dan Workshop Implementasi Model Pembelajaran RADEC Bagi Guru-Guru Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Pedagogia: Jurnal Pendidikan, 8(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v8i1.1853
Sukardi, R., Sopandi, W., & Riandi, R. (2021). Repackaging RADEC learning model into the online mode in science class. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), 012142. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012142
Sukmawati, W., Sari, P. M., & Yatri, I. (2022). Online Application of Science Practicum Video Based on Local Wisdom to Improve Student’s Science Literacy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 2238–2244. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1940
Sukmawati, W., & Zulherman, Z. (2023). Analysis of Changes in Students’ Scientific Literacy Ability After Attending Lectures Using the RADEC Model. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(3), 1039–1044. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i3.2846
Sumintono, B. (2014). Model Rasch untuk penelitian sosial kuantitatif. Statistics Department, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya.
Sumintono, B. (2018). Rasch Model Measurements as Tools in Assesment for Learning. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education Innovation (ICEI 2017), 173, 38–42. https://doi.org/10.2991/icei-17.2018.11
Tulljanah, R., & Amini, R. (2021). Model Pembelajaran RADEC sebagai Alternatif dalam Meningkatkan Higher Order Thinking Skill pada Pembelajaran IPA di Sekolah Dasar: Systematic Review. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(6), 5508–5519. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i6.1680
Wen, C.-T., Liu, C.-C., Chang, H.-Y., Chang, C.-J., Chang, M.-H., Fan Chiang, S.-H., Yang, C.-W., & Hwang, F.-K. (2020). Students’ guided inquiry with simulation and its relation to school science achievement and scientific literacy. Computers & Education, 149(1), 103830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103830
Wiratsiwi, W. (2020). Penerapan Gerakan Literasi Sekolah di Sekolah Dasar. Refleksi Edukatika: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 10(2), 230–238. https://doi.org/10.24176/re.v10i2.4663
Yasin, S. N. T. M., Yunus, M. F. M., & Ismail, I. (2018). The use of rasch measurement model for the validity and reliability. Journal of Counseling and Educational Technology, 1(2), 22. https://doi.org/10.32698/0111
Zandvakili, E., Washington, E., Gordon, E., & Wells, C. (2018). Mastery Learning in the Classroom: Concept Maps, Critical Thinking, Collaborative Assessment (M3CA) Using Multiple Choice Items (MCIs). Journal of Education and Learning, 7(6), 45. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n6p45
Author Biographies
Nurputri Ifdaniyah, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof.Dr.Hamka
Wati Sukmawati, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof.Dr.Hamka
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nurputri Ifdaniyah, Wati Sukmawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).