Investigating Strategies and Best Practices in Teaching Heat and Temperature: a Systematic Review in Science and Physics Education

Authors

Riski Muliyani , Andi Suhandi , Eka Cahya Prima

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i7.4328

Published:

2023-07-25

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 7 (2023): July

Keywords:

Heat and temperature, Strategy and best practices, Systematic review

Review

Downloads

How to Cite

Muliyani, R. ., Suhandi, A. ., & Prima, E. C. . (2023). Investigating Strategies and Best Practices in Teaching Heat and Temperature: a Systematic Review in Science and Physics Education . Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(7), 263–269. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i7.4328
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Teaching heat and temperature is a fundamental aspect of science and physics education. This systematic review investigates the strategies and best practices employed in science education and physics education to effectively teach heat and temperature concepts. A comprehensive search was conducted in reputable databases, resulting in the identification of relevant publications published between 2018 and 2023. Content analysis techniques were applied to analyze the selected publications, focusing on the techniques, outcomes, and conclusions presented. The review highlights a diverse range of instructional strategies, such as in-class demonstrations, virtual methods, and computer simulations, utilized to teach temperature and heat concepts. Educators are encouraged to consider these strategies to enhance student understanding. Furthermore, the review provides a valuable compilation of effective teaching practices, serving as a practical resource for educators and researchers in the field of temperature and heat education. Overall, the review emphasizes the necessity for further research on successful teaching approaches in temperature and heat education, offering valuable insights for both researchers and educators.

References

Ardayeni, E., Yuhana, Y., & Hendrayana, A. (2019). Analisis germane cognitive load siswa ditinjau dari gaya belajar matematis pada pembelajaran Contextual Teaching and Learning. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah Di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika, 5(01), 26. https://doi.org/10.29407/jmen.v5i01.12727

Bakar, M. A., Mukhtar, M., & Khalid, F. (2019). The development of a visual output approach for programming via the application of cognitive load theory and constructivism. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10(11). Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/fdd1/9052ddcff93813a87abf1c24cc11e4dd08bb.pdf

Ballesta-Claver, J., Blanco, M. F. A., & Pérez, I. A. G. (2021). A revisited conceptual change in mathematical-physics education from a neurodidactic approach: A pendulum inquiry. Mathematics, 9(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9151755

Banda, H. J., & Nzabahimana, J. (2023). The Impact of Physics Education Technology (PhET) Interactive Simulation-Based Learning on Motivation and Academic Achievement Among Malawian Physics Students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(1), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-10010-3

Barari, N., RezaeiZadeh, M., Khorasani, A., & Alami, F. (2020). Designing and validating educational standards for E-teaching in virtual learning environments (VLEs), based on revised Bloom’s taxonomy. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1739078

Batlolona, J. R., Singerin, S., & Diantoro, M. (2020). Influence of Problem Based Learning Model on Student Mental Models. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 16(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v16i1.14253

Bumbacher, E., Salehi, S., Wieman, C., & Blikstein, P. (2018). Tools for Science Inquiry Learning: Tool Affordances, Experimentation Strategies, and Conceptual Understanding. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(3), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9719-8

Chong, S. W., Lin, T. J., & Chen, Y. (2022). A methodological review of systematic literature review in higher education: Heterogeneity and homogeneity. Educational Research Review, 2022, 2–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100426

Deniş-Çeliker, H., & Dere, S. (2022). The Effects of The Problem-Based Learnıng Supported by Experiments in Science Course: Students’ Inquiry Learning and Reflective Thinking Skills. Journal of Science Learning, 5(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v5i1.32076

Dervić, D., Nermin, Ä. A. P. O., MeÅ¡ić, V., & Äokić, R. (2019). Cognitive load in multimedia learning: an example from teaching about lenses. Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health, 5(1), 102-118. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.481698

Firdaus, T., Erwin, E., & Rosmiati, R. (2019). Learning media free fall motion to reduce misconceptions and improve students’ understanding of the concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032072

Homayouni, M. (2022). Peer assessment in group-oriented classroom contexts: on the effectiveness of peer assessment coupled with scaffolding and group work on speaking skills and vocabulary learning. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00211-3

Kleine, K., Giones, F., & Tegtmeier, S. (2019). The Learning Process in Technology Entrepreneurship Education—Insights from an Engineering Degree. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(S1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12514

Kurniawan, Y. (2018). The Enhancement of Consistency of Interpretation Skills on the Newton’s Laws Concept. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 3(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v3i1.411

Lai, C. L. (2020). Trends of mobile learning: A review of the top 100 highly cited papers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 721–742. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12884

Lee, K. M. (2018). New approaches to literacies studies in the digital and globalizing world: Border-crossing discourses in the global online affinity spaces. In Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences (Vol. 79, Issues 12-A(E)). Arizona State University. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2018-48573-148&site=ehost-live

Liew, T. W., Tan, S. M., Tan, T. M., & Kew, S. N. (2020). Does speaker’s voice enthusiasm affect social cue, cognitive load and transfer in multimedia learning?. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(3/4), 117-135. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-11-2019-0124

Malone, K. L., Schunn, C. D., & Schuchardt, A. M. (2018). Improving Conceptual Understanding and Representation Skills Through Excel-Based Modeling. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9706-0

Moon, J., & Ryu, J. (2021). The effects of social and cognitive cues on learning comprehension, eye-gaze pattern, and cognitive load in video instruction. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-020-09255-x

Nugraha, M. G., Kidman, G., Tan, H., & Education, F. (2023). Pre-service teacher in STEM education : An integrative review and mapping of the Indonesian research literature. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(5), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13155

Nyirahabimana, P., Minani, E., Nduwingoma, M., & Kemeza, I. (2022). A scientometric review of multimedia in teaching and learning of physics. LUMAT, 10(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.10.1.1634

Sibgatullin, I. R., Baturina, R. V, & Chauzova, V. (2022). A Systematic Review on Algebraic Thinking in Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11486

Sokhanvar, Z., Salehi, K., & Sokhanvar, F. (2021). Advantages of authentic assessment for improving the learning experience and employability skills of higher education students: A systematic literature review. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101030

Sri Asmorowati, D., Wardani, S., & Widhi Mahatmanti, F. (2021). Analysis of Student Science Process Skills in The Practicum of Physical Chemistry Based on Linguistic and Interpersonal Intelligence. International Journal of Active Learning, 6(1), 34–40. Retrieved from http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/ijal

Sun, D., & Looi, C. K. (2019). An inspiration from border crossing: Principle of boundary activity for integrating learning in the formal and informal spaces. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology, 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3071-1_4

Teig, N., Scherer, R., & Kjærnsli, M. (2020). Identifying patterns of students’ performance on simulated inquiry tasks using PISA 2015 log-file data. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(9), 1400–1429. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21657

Vanbecelaere, S., Van den Berghe, K., Cornillie, F., Sasanguie, D., Reynvoet, B., & Depaepe, F. (2020). The effectiveness of adaptive versus non-adaptive learning with digital educational games. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(4), 502–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12416

Vyas, V. S., Kemp, B., & Reid, S. A. (2021). Zeroing in on the best early-course metrics to identify at-risk students in general chemistry: an adaptive learning pre-assessment vs. traditional diagnostic exam. International Journal of Science Education, 43(4), 552–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1874071

Widodo, A. P. A., Hufad, A., Sunardi, & Nandiyanto, A. B. D. (2020). Collaborative teaching in heat transfer for slow learner students. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 15(Special Issue), 11–21. Retrieved from https://jestec.taylors.edu.my/Special Issue AASEC2019/AASEC2019_002.pdf

Wirzberger, M., Borst, J. P., Krems, J. F., & Rey, G. D. (2020). Memory-related cognitive load effects in an interrupted learning task: A model-based explanation. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 20(July), 100139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2020.100139

Wongta, J., Grosseau, C., Yachulawetkunakorn, C., Watthana, C., & Wongwatkit, C. (2021). Effects of a collaborative STEM-based orientation approach on senior high-school students’ creativity and operacy. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 15(1), 71–106. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2021.111599

Yavich, R., & Rotnitsky, I. (2020). Multiple intelligences and success in school studies. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(6), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n6p107

Yousaf, Y., Shoaib, M., Hassan, M. A., & Habiba, U. (2021). An intelligent content provider based on students learning style to increase their engagement level and performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1900875

Zanoletti, M., & Godard, F. (2022). Studying transient heat transfer in a cylindrical pin fin with radiation and convection. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 51(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/03064190221123536

Zu, T., Munsell, J., & Rebello, N. S. (2021, May). Subjective measure of cognitive load depends on participants’ content knowledge level. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6, p. 647097). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.647097

Author Biographies

Riski Muliyani, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Andi Suhandi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Eka Cahya Prima, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Riski Muliyani, Andi Suhandi, Eka Cahya Prima

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).