Development and Validation of Animation-Based Science Learning Media in the STEM-PBL Model to Improve Students Critical Thinking and Digital Literacy

Authors

Fitria Lafifa , Dadan Rosana

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.4448

Published:

2023-09-25

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 9 (2023): September

Keywords:

Animation, Critical Thinking, Digital Literacy, Learning Media, STEM-PBL

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Lafifa, F., & Rosana, D. (2023). Development and Validation of Animation-Based Science Learning Media in the STEM-PBL Model to Improve Students Critical Thinking and Digital Literacy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 7445–7453. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.4448
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This study aims to produce an animation technology-based learning media product with the STEM-PBL model to improve critical thinking and digital literacy that is feasible and valid. The research uses a 4-D model. The research subjects were 27 MTsN, 1 Blitar City student, two expert lecturers, and one science teacher. The instruments used were validation sheets, readability, and practicality questionnaires with a 5-level Likert scale. The data analysis technique is descriptive and uses the ideal standard deviation value. The research results show that the product is in a very valid and feasible category, with a percentage of 94% material experts and 92% media experts. The readability and practicality tests are in a very good variety with rates of 85% and 99%. So that the product is very feasible and valid to use in learning. The recommendation for further research is to test the effectiveness of media when learning to improve student's critical thinking and digital literacy.

References

Aktoprakac, A., & Hursen, C. (2022). A Bibliometric And Content Analysis Of Critical Thinking In Primary Education. Thinking Skills and Creavity, 4.

Amir, M. (2009). Inovasi Pendidikan Melalui Problem Based Learning: Bagaimana Pendidik Memberdayakan Pemelajar di Era Penetahuan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Anisa, A. R., Ala, A. I., & Suffanah, K. N. (2021). Pengaruh Kurangnya Literasi serta Kemampuan dalam Berpikir Kritis yang Masih Rendah dalam Pendidikan di Indonesia. Conference Series Journal, 01(01), 1–12.

Aprilia, C., Anggereini, E., & Ahda, Y. (2023). The Development of Web-Based Learning Media ( Glideapps ) to Improve Digital Literacy and Science Literacy About Materials Human Digestive Systems. 9(3), 1112–1117. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i3.2618

Banawi, A. (2019). Implementasi Pendekatan Saintifik Pada Sintaks Discovery/Inquiry Learning, Based Learning, Project Based Learning. Biosel: Biology Science and Education, 8(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.33477/bs.v8i1.850

Bawden, D. (2008). Origins and Concepts of Digital Literacy dalam Lankshear, C. dan Knobel, M., Editors (Eds.), Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.

Cameron, S., & Craig, C. (2016). STEM labs for middle grades, grades 5-8. Illinois: Mark Twain Media.

Dewi, E. R. (2018). Metode Pembelajaran Modern Dan Konvensional Pada Sekolah Menengah Atas. PEMBELAJAR: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Keguruan, Dan Pembelajaran, 2(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.26858/pembelajar.v2i1.5442

Dewi, N., & Riandi, R. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kompleks Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Berbantuan Mind Mapping. Edusains, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v8i1.1805

Ennis, R. (1989). Evaluating Critical Thinking. California: Midwest Publications.

Eshet-Alkali, Y., & Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2004). Experiments in digital literacy. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7(4), 421–429. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2004.7.421

Facione, P. a. (2011). Critical Thinking : What It Is and Why It Counts. In Insight assessment. Retrieved from https://www.insightassessment.com/CT-Resources/Teaching-For-and-About-Critical-Thinking/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts-PDF

Fisher, A. (2009). Berpikir Kritis (Sebuah pengantar). Jakarta: Erlangga.

Fitriyani , F., & Nugroho, A. T. (2022). Literasi Digital di Era Pembelajaran Abad 21. El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(3), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.47467/elmujtama.v2i3.1088

Gilster, P. (1997). Digital Literacy. New York: Willy.

Hague, C., & Payton, S. (2013). Digital Literacy across the Curriculum. In Literacy across the Curriculum. https://doi.org/10.18848/978-1-61229-143-7/cgp

Haryani, E., Cobern, W. W., Pleasants, B. A. S., & Fetters, M. K. (2021). Analysis of teachers’ resources for integrating the skills of creativity and innovation, critical thinking and problem solving, collaboration, and communication in science classroom. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(1), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i1.27084

Hasibuan, A. T., & Prastowo, A. (2019). Konsep Pendidikan Abad 21: Kepemimpinan Dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Sd/Mi. MAGISTRA: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar Dan Keislaman, 10(1), 26–50. https://doi.org/10.31942/mgs.v10i1.2714

Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 722–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.013

Intelligence, E. (2020). Economist Intelligence Unit. Retrieved from https://theinclusiveinternet.eiu.com/explore/countries/ID/%0Aperformance/indicators/readiness/literacy

Kim, K. T. (2019). The structural relationship among digital literacy, learning strategies, and core competencies among south korean college students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 19(2), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2019.2.001

Kurniati, R. D., Andra, D., & Wayan Distrik, I. (2021). E-module development based on PBL integrated STEM assisted by social media to improve critical thinking skill: A preliminary study. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1796(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012077

Kurniawan, D. A., & Husna, S. M. (2023). A Study of Critical Thinking Skills , Science Process Skills and Digital Literacy : Reviewed Based on the Gender. 9(4), 1741–1752. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i4.1644

Mardapi, D. (2012). Pengukuran Penilaian & Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.

Mardhiyah, R. H., Aldriani, S. N., Chitta, F., & Zulfikar, M. R. (2021). Pentingnya Keterampilan Belajar di Abad 21 sebagai Tuntutan dalam Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Jurnal Pendidikan, 12(1), 29–40. Retrieved from https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1991.n.20210906.1730.014.html

Muhali, M. (2019). Pembelajaran Inovatif Abad Ke-21. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 3(2), 25. https://doi.org/10.36312/e-saintika.v3i2.126

Mulyani, T. (2019). Pendekatan Pembelajaran STEM untuk menghadapi Revolusi. Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana 2019, 7(1), 455.

Murray-Harvey, R., Santos Reyes, W., & Pourshafie, T. (2013). What teacher education students learn about collaboration from problem-based learning. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 1(1), 114–134.

Puspitarini, Y. D., & Hanif, M. (2019). Using Learning Media to Increase Learning Motivation in Elementary School. Anatolian Journal of Education, 4(2), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2019.426a

Putri, W. M., Bakri, F., & Permana, A. H. (2016). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Multimedia Augmented Reality Pada Pokok Bahasan Alat Optik. V, SNF2016-RND-83-SNF2016-RND-88. https://doi.org/10.21009/0305010218

Rahayu, R., Iskandar, S., & Abidin, Y. (2022). Inovasi Pembelajaran Abad 21 Dan Penerapannya Di Indonesia. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(2), 2099–2104. Retrieved from https://jbasic.org/index.php/basicedu/article/view/2082/pdf

Rahayu, S., Isnaeni, W., & Masturi, M. (2022). Critical Thinking Skills and Digital Literacy of High School Students in Science Learning Using E-Learning with STEM Vision. Journal of Innovative Science …, 11(37), 354–367. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jise/article/view/57281

Reeve, E. M. (2015). STEM Education is Here To Stay. ITEEA.

Rusmono. (2012). Strategi Pembelajaran dengan Problem Based Learning itu. Perlu: untuk meningkatkan Profesionalitas Guru. Bogor: Ghalia.

Sangaji, A. C., & Pribadi, I. A. (2023). Effect of Digital Literacy and Educational Technology on School Quality: Case Study of The Tiara Bangsa School. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(2), 721–728. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i2.2827

Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018. In OECD: Insight and Interpretations.

Simeon, M. I., Samsudin, M. A., & Yakob, N. (2022). Effect of design thinking approach on students’ achievement in some selected physics concepts in the context of STEM learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(1), 185–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09601-1

Sofyan, E., Gusniawati, & Buhaerah. (2021). Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Menggunakan Media Pembelajaran Metode Sydw Pada Pelajaran Matematika Di Smpn 3 Pare. Mathematics Education Journal, 4(2), 6–10.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (22nd ed.). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Syaparuddin, S., & Elihami, E. (2020). Peningkatan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Melalui Video pada Pembelajaran PKn di Sekolah Paket C. Jurnal Edukasi Nonformal, 1(1), 187–200.

Thiagarajan, S. (1974). Instructional Development for Training Teacher of Exceptional Cheldren. Indiana: A Sourcebook, indiana Univ, Blomington Center for Inovation in Indiana University.

Thiaragajan, Sivasailam, & Others. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. In Journal of School Psychology (Vol. 14). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(76)90066-2

Tristiana, N. E., & Kayyis, R. (2022). the Students Response of Using Google Classroom for Online Class. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 19–27.

Tugtekin, E. B., & Koc, M. (2020). Understanding the relationship between new media literacy, communication skills, and democratic tendency: Model development and testing. New Media and Society, 22(10), 1922–1941. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819887705

UNESCO. (2018). A Global Framework of Reference on Digital Literacy. In UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Canada.

Wahono, B., Lin, P. L., & Chang, C. Y. (2020). Evidence of STEM enactment effectiveness in Asian student learning outcomes. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00236-1

Wahyuaji, N. R., & Suparman. (2018). Deskripsi Kebutuhan Media Pembelajaran E-Learning Berpendekatan STEM untuk Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis dan Kreatif Siswa SMA Kelas XI. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Ahmad Dahlan, (May), 194–199.

Weiss, R. E., Knowltonb, D. S., & Morrisonc, G. R. (2002). Principles for using animation in computer- based instruction: theoretical heuristics for effective design. Computers in Human Behaviour, 18(18), 465–477.

Yildirim, B., & Turk, C. (2018). The effectiveness of argumentation-assisted STEM practices. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 13(3), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v13i3.3457

Yunianto, T., Suyadi, S., & Suherman, S. (2020). Pembelajaran abad 21: Pengaruhnya terhadap pembentukan karakter akhlak melalui pembelajaran STAD dan PBL dalam kurikulum 2013. Premiere Educandum : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 10(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v10i2.6339

Ziatdinov, R., & Valles, J. R. (2022). Synthesis of Modeling, Visualization, and Programming in GeoGebra as an Effective Approach for Teaching and Learning STEM Topics. Mathematics, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/math10030398

Zubaidah, S. (2016). Keterampilan Abad Ke-21: Keterampilan Yang Diajarkan Melalui Pembelajaran. Isu-Isu Strategis Pembelajaran MIPA Abad 21, 2(2), 1–17.

Author Biographies

Fitria Lafifa, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Dadan Rosana, Pendidikan Sains, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Fitria Lafifa, Dadan Rosana

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).